TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors influencing environmental stewardship in U.S. agriculture
T2 - Conservation program participants vs. non-participants
AU - Schaible, Glenn D.
AU - Mishra, Ashok K.
AU - Lambert, Dayton M.
AU - Panterov, George
N1 - Funding Information:
Lambert's research was supported by United States Department of Agriculture Hatch Project TEN00442 and the Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station . Mishra's time on this research was supported by United States Department of Agriculture Hatch Project LAB94163 and the Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station . The authors appreciate the comments and suggestions from the Journal's two anonymous reviewers and from Marcel Aillery, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. The views expressed are the author(s) and should not be attributed to the Economic Research Service, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the University of Tennessee, Louisiana State University, or the World Bank.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015.
Copyright:
Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/7/1
Y1 - 2015/7/1
N2 - United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) conservation policy has increasingly shifted from a traditional land-retirement focus to greater emphasis on producer adoption of working-land conservation practices. This research made use of USDA integrated field/farm surveys, the Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) and Agricultural Resources Management Survey (ARMS), to (1) enhance understanding of operator, field, farm, economic, and environmental characteristic differences between conservation program participants and non-participants across a farm typology, and (2) to enhance understanding of the relative importance of these factors on influencing farm stewardship intensity in corn and wheat production, i.e., how these factors influence differences in producer adoption of alternative levels of land and pest-management practices between conservation program participants and non-participants. The research used a cost-function acreage-based technology adoption model to examine farm stewardship differences. Results indicate that program non-participants invest more heavily in land conserving and pest-management practices than program participants. Relative prices, structural, and socio-environmental factors play significantly different roles across crops, and between conservation program participants and non-participants, in their influence on producer adoption decisions for land and pest-management intensity. The environmental effectiveness and cost efficiency of conservation programs will likely improve when their implementation more explicitly recognizes farm heterogeneity as well as differences in farmer motivations for stewardship investments. Recognizing these differences can help improve targeting of conservation incentive structures.
AB - United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) conservation policy has increasingly shifted from a traditional land-retirement focus to greater emphasis on producer adoption of working-land conservation practices. This research made use of USDA integrated field/farm surveys, the Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) and Agricultural Resources Management Survey (ARMS), to (1) enhance understanding of operator, field, farm, economic, and environmental characteristic differences between conservation program participants and non-participants across a farm typology, and (2) to enhance understanding of the relative importance of these factors on influencing farm stewardship intensity in corn and wheat production, i.e., how these factors influence differences in producer adoption of alternative levels of land and pest-management practices between conservation program participants and non-participants. The research used a cost-function acreage-based technology adoption model to examine farm stewardship differences. Results indicate that program non-participants invest more heavily in land conserving and pest-management practices than program participants. Relative prices, structural, and socio-environmental factors play significantly different roles across crops, and between conservation program participants and non-participants, in their influence on producer adoption decisions for land and pest-management intensity. The environmental effectiveness and cost efficiency of conservation programs will likely improve when their implementation more explicitly recognizes farm heterogeneity as well as differences in farmer motivations for stewardship investments. Recognizing these differences can help improve targeting of conservation incentive structures.
KW - Conservation policy
KW - Conservation practices
KW - Conservation programs
KW - Cost-function models
KW - Environmental stewardship
KW - Technology adoption
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924276568&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924276568&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.018
DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.018
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84924276568
SN - 0264-8377
VL - 46
SP - 125
EP - 141
JO - Land Use Policy
JF - Land Use Policy
ER -