Factors affecting citations: A comparison between chinese and english journals in ecology

Hong Xiao, Fei Yuan, Jianguo Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Citations to journal papers in eight ecological journals at home and abroad were analyzed to identify key contributing factors and compare the difference between the selected Chinese and English journals. The results indicated that the annual average citations of English journals were much higher than those of Chinese journals. Percentage of single-authored papers was also higher in English journals than in Chinese journals. Co-authored papers accounted for a large proportion of papers published in all journals, indicating the significance of collaboration in modern ecological research. A positive correlation was observed between the number of authors and citation rate, but the relationship was weak in general. On an average, papers in English journals were longer than those in Chinese journals, and the annual average citations increased with paper length. By tracking the citation dynamics of papers, we found that the most cited papers in English journals had higher increasing citation rates. This suggested that they had a stronger persistence effect than those in Chinese journals. These results will provide some useful guidance for authors and editors in ecology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1253-1262
Number of pages10
JournalChinese Journal of Applied Ecology
Volume20
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 2009

Fingerprint

ecology
persistence
rate
comparison
effect

Keywords

  • Citation rate
  • Ecology
  • Impact factor
  • Number of authors
  • Paper length

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Cite this

Factors affecting citations : A comparison between chinese and english journals in ecology. / Xiao, Hong; Yuan, Fei; Wu, Jianguo.

In: Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 20, No. 5, 05.2009, p. 1253-1262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7d38c3cc6e0547c2a7071fc93f0a1e07,
title = "Factors affecting citations: A comparison between chinese and english journals in ecology",
abstract = "Citations to journal papers in eight ecological journals at home and abroad were analyzed to identify key contributing factors and compare the difference between the selected Chinese and English journals. The results indicated that the annual average citations of English journals were much higher than those of Chinese journals. Percentage of single-authored papers was also higher in English journals than in Chinese journals. Co-authored papers accounted for a large proportion of papers published in all journals, indicating the significance of collaboration in modern ecological research. A positive correlation was observed between the number of authors and citation rate, but the relationship was weak in general. On an average, papers in English journals were longer than those in Chinese journals, and the annual average citations increased with paper length. By tracking the citation dynamics of papers, we found that the most cited papers in English journals had higher increasing citation rates. This suggested that they had a stronger persistence effect than those in Chinese journals. These results will provide some useful guidance for authors and editors in ecology.",
keywords = "Citation rate, Ecology, Impact factor, Number of authors, Paper length",
author = "Hong Xiao and Fei Yuan and Jianguo Wu",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "1253--1262",
journal = "Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology",
issn = "1001-9332",
publisher = "Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors affecting citations

T2 - A comparison between chinese and english journals in ecology

AU - Xiao, Hong

AU - Yuan, Fei

AU - Wu, Jianguo

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - Citations to journal papers in eight ecological journals at home and abroad were analyzed to identify key contributing factors and compare the difference between the selected Chinese and English journals. The results indicated that the annual average citations of English journals were much higher than those of Chinese journals. Percentage of single-authored papers was also higher in English journals than in Chinese journals. Co-authored papers accounted for a large proportion of papers published in all journals, indicating the significance of collaboration in modern ecological research. A positive correlation was observed between the number of authors and citation rate, but the relationship was weak in general. On an average, papers in English journals were longer than those in Chinese journals, and the annual average citations increased with paper length. By tracking the citation dynamics of papers, we found that the most cited papers in English journals had higher increasing citation rates. This suggested that they had a stronger persistence effect than those in Chinese journals. These results will provide some useful guidance for authors and editors in ecology.

AB - Citations to journal papers in eight ecological journals at home and abroad were analyzed to identify key contributing factors and compare the difference between the selected Chinese and English journals. The results indicated that the annual average citations of English journals were much higher than those of Chinese journals. Percentage of single-authored papers was also higher in English journals than in Chinese journals. Co-authored papers accounted for a large proportion of papers published in all journals, indicating the significance of collaboration in modern ecological research. A positive correlation was observed between the number of authors and citation rate, but the relationship was weak in general. On an average, papers in English journals were longer than those in Chinese journals, and the annual average citations increased with paper length. By tracking the citation dynamics of papers, we found that the most cited papers in English journals had higher increasing citation rates. This suggested that they had a stronger persistence effect than those in Chinese journals. These results will provide some useful guidance for authors and editors in ecology.

KW - Citation rate

KW - Ecology

KW - Impact factor

KW - Number of authors

KW - Paper length

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67651114015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67651114015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 19803190

AN - SCOPUS:67651114015

VL - 20

SP - 1253

EP - 1262

JO - Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology

JF - Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology

SN - 1001-9332

IS - 5

ER -