Exploring the microfoundations of the gender equality peace hypothesis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that patriarchal structures and rigid gender hierarchies at the societal level increase a country's propensity for involvement in violent social and political conflict. While examining macrolevel predictors and outcomes, the arguments put forth in these studies rely heavily on theories linking individuals' attitudes toward gender equality to individuals' beliefs in the appropriateness of violence as a means of attaining political or social objectives. In this research, we explore the microfoundations of the gender equality-peace thesis by examining the conditional impact of beliefs about gender egalitarianism on support for the use of force to achieve foreign policy objectives. Using data from a nationally representative survey of US citizens, we find that as the strength of gender egalitarian attitudes increases, respondents' support for the use of force to achieve traditional security objectives declines. Importantly, however, our results suggest that gender egalitarian attitudes exert the strongest suppressive effect on support for the use force among male respondents: rising gender egalitarianism among men effectively closes the gender gap in support for the use of force. Consequently, these results provide microlevel support for the relationship between gender equality and peace found in macrolevel observational analyses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)345-367
Number of pages23
JournalInternational Studies Review
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

equality
peace
gender
egalitarianism
political conflict
US citizen
social conflict
foreign policy
violence

Keywords

  • Gender equality
  • International conflict
  • Violence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Exploring the microfoundations of the gender equality peace hypothesis. / Wood, Reed; Ramirez, Mark.

In: International Studies Review, Vol. 20, No. 3, 01.01.2018, p. 345-367.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ca9c477a39d14c4182d16be31d3d22cd,
title = "Exploring the microfoundations of the gender equality peace hypothesis",
abstract = "Previous studies suggest that patriarchal structures and rigid gender hierarchies at the societal level increase a country's propensity for involvement in violent social and political conflict. While examining macrolevel predictors and outcomes, the arguments put forth in these studies rely heavily on theories linking individuals' attitudes toward gender equality to individuals' beliefs in the appropriateness of violence as a means of attaining political or social objectives. In this research, we explore the microfoundations of the gender equality-peace thesis by examining the conditional impact of beliefs about gender egalitarianism on support for the use of force to achieve foreign policy objectives. Using data from a nationally representative survey of US citizens, we find that as the strength of gender egalitarian attitudes increases, respondents' support for the use of force to achieve traditional security objectives declines. Importantly, however, our results suggest that gender egalitarian attitudes exert the strongest suppressive effect on support for the use force among male respondents: rising gender egalitarianism among men effectively closes the gender gap in support for the use of force. Consequently, these results provide microlevel support for the relationship between gender equality and peace found in macrolevel observational analyses.",
keywords = "Gender equality, International conflict, Violence",
author = "Reed Wood and Mark Ramirez",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/ISR/VIX016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "345--367",
journal = "International Studies Review",
issn = "1521-9488",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the microfoundations of the gender equality peace hypothesis

AU - Wood, Reed

AU - Ramirez, Mark

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Previous studies suggest that patriarchal structures and rigid gender hierarchies at the societal level increase a country's propensity for involvement in violent social and political conflict. While examining macrolevel predictors and outcomes, the arguments put forth in these studies rely heavily on theories linking individuals' attitudes toward gender equality to individuals' beliefs in the appropriateness of violence as a means of attaining political or social objectives. In this research, we explore the microfoundations of the gender equality-peace thesis by examining the conditional impact of beliefs about gender egalitarianism on support for the use of force to achieve foreign policy objectives. Using data from a nationally representative survey of US citizens, we find that as the strength of gender egalitarian attitudes increases, respondents' support for the use of force to achieve traditional security objectives declines. Importantly, however, our results suggest that gender egalitarian attitudes exert the strongest suppressive effect on support for the use force among male respondents: rising gender egalitarianism among men effectively closes the gender gap in support for the use of force. Consequently, these results provide microlevel support for the relationship between gender equality and peace found in macrolevel observational analyses.

AB - Previous studies suggest that patriarchal structures and rigid gender hierarchies at the societal level increase a country's propensity for involvement in violent social and political conflict. While examining macrolevel predictors and outcomes, the arguments put forth in these studies rely heavily on theories linking individuals' attitudes toward gender equality to individuals' beliefs in the appropriateness of violence as a means of attaining political or social objectives. In this research, we explore the microfoundations of the gender equality-peace thesis by examining the conditional impact of beliefs about gender egalitarianism on support for the use of force to achieve foreign policy objectives. Using data from a nationally representative survey of US citizens, we find that as the strength of gender egalitarian attitudes increases, respondents' support for the use of force to achieve traditional security objectives declines. Importantly, however, our results suggest that gender egalitarian attitudes exert the strongest suppressive effect on support for the use force among male respondents: rising gender egalitarianism among men effectively closes the gender gap in support for the use of force. Consequently, these results provide microlevel support for the relationship between gender equality and peace found in macrolevel observational analyses.

KW - Gender equality

KW - International conflict

KW - Violence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055286278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055286278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ISR/VIX016

DO - 10.1093/ISR/VIX016

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 345

EP - 367

JO - International Studies Review

JF - International Studies Review

SN - 1521-9488

IS - 3

ER -