Exploring dual gender typicality among young adults in the United States

Naomi C.Z. Andrews, Carol Martin, Rachel E. Cook, Ryan D. Field, Dawn E. England

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The goal of the current study was to better understand the development of gender typicality in young adulthood by applying the dual-identity approach to gender typicality, previously developed with children, to a university sample. Participants (n = 215, M age = 20.20 years; 62% female) were asked to rate their perceived similarity to both own- and other-gender peers. They also completed questionnaires assessing sexist attitudes, internalized sexualization (females), adherence to male-typed behaviors in the context of interpersonal relationships (males; adherence to physical toughness and restrictive emotional expressivity), gender-based relationship efficacy, friendships, self-esteem, social self-efficacy, and social anxiety. Results indicated that self-perceived gender typicality involves comparisons to both gender groups, and that meaningful typologies can be created based on similarity to own- and other-gender groups. As with children, results indicated that identifying with one’s own gender was advantageous in terms of low social anxiety and relationships with own-gender peers. For adults who identified with both own- and other-gender peers, we identified additional social benefits (i.e., efficacy and friendships with other-gender peers). Further, we identified a downside to own-gender typicality: individuals who identified only with their own gender had more sexist attitudes than those who identified with the other gender. Findings support the viability of the dual-identity approach in young adults, and have implications for researchers assessing gender typicality across development.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    JournalInternational Journal of Behavioral Development
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

    Fingerprint

    young adult
    Young Adult
    gender
    friendship
    Anxiety
    anxiety
    social benefits
    Self Efficacy
    Self Concept
    adulthood
    self-esteem
    self-efficacy
    typology
    Group
    Research Personnel

    Keywords

    • Gender typicality
    • gender typicality
    • social adjustment
    • young adults

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Psychology
    • Education
    • Developmental and Educational Psychology
    • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
    • Developmental Neuroscience
    • Life-span and Life-course Studies

    Cite this

    Exploring dual gender typicality among young adults in the United States. / Andrews, Naomi C.Z.; Martin, Carol; Cook, Rachel E.; Field, Ryan D.; England, Dawn E.

    In: International Journal of Behavioral Development, 01.01.2019.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{e9a56e47d59a48a28e36773c9279e5aa,
    title = "Exploring dual gender typicality among young adults in the United States",
    abstract = "The goal of the current study was to better understand the development of gender typicality in young adulthood by applying the dual-identity approach to gender typicality, previously developed with children, to a university sample. Participants (n = 215, M age = 20.20 years; 62{\%} female) were asked to rate their perceived similarity to both own- and other-gender peers. They also completed questionnaires assessing sexist attitudes, internalized sexualization (females), adherence to male-typed behaviors in the context of interpersonal relationships (males; adherence to physical toughness and restrictive emotional expressivity), gender-based relationship efficacy, friendships, self-esteem, social self-efficacy, and social anxiety. Results indicated that self-perceived gender typicality involves comparisons to both gender groups, and that meaningful typologies can be created based on similarity to own- and other-gender groups. As with children, results indicated that identifying with one’s own gender was advantageous in terms of low social anxiety and relationships with own-gender peers. For adults who identified with both own- and other-gender peers, we identified additional social benefits (i.e., efficacy and friendships with other-gender peers). Further, we identified a downside to own-gender typicality: individuals who identified only with their own gender had more sexist attitudes than those who identified with the other gender. Findings support the viability of the dual-identity approach in young adults, and have implications for researchers assessing gender typicality across development.",
    keywords = "Gender typicality, gender typicality, social adjustment, young adults",
    author = "Andrews, {Naomi C.Z.} and Carol Martin and Cook, {Rachel E.} and Field, {Ryan D.} and England, {Dawn E.}",
    year = "2019",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/0165025418811125",
    language = "English (US)",
    journal = "International Journal of Behavioral Development",
    issn = "0165-0254",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Exploring dual gender typicality among young adults in the United States

    AU - Andrews, Naomi C.Z.

    AU - Martin, Carol

    AU - Cook, Rachel E.

    AU - Field, Ryan D.

    AU - England, Dawn E.

    PY - 2019/1/1

    Y1 - 2019/1/1

    N2 - The goal of the current study was to better understand the development of gender typicality in young adulthood by applying the dual-identity approach to gender typicality, previously developed with children, to a university sample. Participants (n = 215, M age = 20.20 years; 62% female) were asked to rate their perceived similarity to both own- and other-gender peers. They also completed questionnaires assessing sexist attitudes, internalized sexualization (females), adherence to male-typed behaviors in the context of interpersonal relationships (males; adherence to physical toughness and restrictive emotional expressivity), gender-based relationship efficacy, friendships, self-esteem, social self-efficacy, and social anxiety. Results indicated that self-perceived gender typicality involves comparisons to both gender groups, and that meaningful typologies can be created based on similarity to own- and other-gender groups. As with children, results indicated that identifying with one’s own gender was advantageous in terms of low social anxiety and relationships with own-gender peers. For adults who identified with both own- and other-gender peers, we identified additional social benefits (i.e., efficacy and friendships with other-gender peers). Further, we identified a downside to own-gender typicality: individuals who identified only with their own gender had more sexist attitudes than those who identified with the other gender. Findings support the viability of the dual-identity approach in young adults, and have implications for researchers assessing gender typicality across development.

    AB - The goal of the current study was to better understand the development of gender typicality in young adulthood by applying the dual-identity approach to gender typicality, previously developed with children, to a university sample. Participants (n = 215, M age = 20.20 years; 62% female) were asked to rate their perceived similarity to both own- and other-gender peers. They also completed questionnaires assessing sexist attitudes, internalized sexualization (females), adherence to male-typed behaviors in the context of interpersonal relationships (males; adherence to physical toughness and restrictive emotional expressivity), gender-based relationship efficacy, friendships, self-esteem, social self-efficacy, and social anxiety. Results indicated that self-perceived gender typicality involves comparisons to both gender groups, and that meaningful typologies can be created based on similarity to own- and other-gender groups. As with children, results indicated that identifying with one’s own gender was advantageous in terms of low social anxiety and relationships with own-gender peers. For adults who identified with both own- and other-gender peers, we identified additional social benefits (i.e., efficacy and friendships with other-gender peers). Further, we identified a downside to own-gender typicality: individuals who identified only with their own gender had more sexist attitudes than those who identified with the other gender. Findings support the viability of the dual-identity approach in young adults, and have implications for researchers assessing gender typicality across development.

    KW - Gender typicality

    KW - gender typicality

    KW - social adjustment

    KW - young adults

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063970658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063970658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0165025418811125

    DO - 10.1177/0165025418811125

    M3 - Article

    JO - International Journal of Behavioral Development

    JF - International Journal of Behavioral Development

    SN - 0165-0254

    ER -