Exploring dual gender typicality among young adults in the United States

Naomi C.Z. Andrews, Carol Martin, Rachel E. Cook, Ryan D. Field, Dawn E. England

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The goal of the current study was to better understand the development of gender typicality in young adulthood by applying the dual-identity approach to gender typicality, previously developed with children, to a university sample. Participants (n = 215, M age = 20.20 years; 62% female) were asked to rate their perceived similarity to both own- and other-gender peers. They also completed questionnaires assessing sexist attitudes, internalized sexualization (females), adherence to male-typed behaviors in the context of interpersonal relationships (males; adherence to physical toughness and restrictive emotional expressivity), gender-based relationship efficacy, friendships, self-esteem, social self-efficacy, and social anxiety. Results indicated that self-perceived gender typicality involves comparisons to both gender groups, and that meaningful typologies can be created based on similarity to own- and other-gender groups. As with children, results indicated that identifying with one’s own gender was advantageous in terms of low social anxiety and relationships with own-gender peers. For adults who identified with both own- and other-gender peers, we identified additional social benefits (i.e., efficacy and friendships with other-gender peers). Further, we identified a downside to own-gender typicality: individuals who identified only with their own gender had more sexist attitudes than those who identified with the other gender. Findings support the viability of the dual-identity approach in young adults, and have implications for researchers assessing gender typicality across development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInternational Journal of Behavioral Development
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

young adult
Young Adult
gender
friendship
Anxiety
anxiety
social benefits
Self Efficacy
Self Concept
adulthood
self-esteem
self-efficacy
typology
Group
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Gender typicality
  • gender typicality
  • social adjustment
  • young adults

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

Exploring dual gender typicality among young adults in the United States. / Andrews, Naomi C.Z.; Martin, Carol; Cook, Rachel E.; Field, Ryan D.; England, Dawn E.

In: International Journal of Behavioral Development, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e9a56e47d59a48a28e36773c9279e5aa,
title = "Exploring dual gender typicality among young adults in the United States",
abstract = "The goal of the current study was to better understand the development of gender typicality in young adulthood by applying the dual-identity approach to gender typicality, previously developed with children, to a university sample. Participants (n = 215, M age = 20.20 years; 62{\%} female) were asked to rate their perceived similarity to both own- and other-gender peers. They also completed questionnaires assessing sexist attitudes, internalized sexualization (females), adherence to male-typed behaviors in the context of interpersonal relationships (males; adherence to physical toughness and restrictive emotional expressivity), gender-based relationship efficacy, friendships, self-esteem, social self-efficacy, and social anxiety. Results indicated that self-perceived gender typicality involves comparisons to both gender groups, and that meaningful typologies can be created based on similarity to own- and other-gender groups. As with children, results indicated that identifying with one’s own gender was advantageous in terms of low social anxiety and relationships with own-gender peers. For adults who identified with both own- and other-gender peers, we identified additional social benefits (i.e., efficacy and friendships with other-gender peers). Further, we identified a downside to own-gender typicality: individuals who identified only with their own gender had more sexist attitudes than those who identified with the other gender. Findings support the viability of the dual-identity approach in young adults, and have implications for researchers assessing gender typicality across development.",
keywords = "Gender typicality, gender typicality, social adjustment, young adults",
author = "Andrews, {Naomi C.Z.} and Carol Martin and Cook, {Rachel E.} and Field, {Ryan D.} and England, {Dawn E.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0165025418811125",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "International Journal of Behavioral Development",
issn = "0165-0254",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring dual gender typicality among young adults in the United States

AU - Andrews, Naomi C.Z.

AU - Martin, Carol

AU - Cook, Rachel E.

AU - Field, Ryan D.

AU - England, Dawn E.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The goal of the current study was to better understand the development of gender typicality in young adulthood by applying the dual-identity approach to gender typicality, previously developed with children, to a university sample. Participants (n = 215, M age = 20.20 years; 62% female) were asked to rate their perceived similarity to both own- and other-gender peers. They also completed questionnaires assessing sexist attitudes, internalized sexualization (females), adherence to male-typed behaviors in the context of interpersonal relationships (males; adherence to physical toughness and restrictive emotional expressivity), gender-based relationship efficacy, friendships, self-esteem, social self-efficacy, and social anxiety. Results indicated that self-perceived gender typicality involves comparisons to both gender groups, and that meaningful typologies can be created based on similarity to own- and other-gender groups. As with children, results indicated that identifying with one’s own gender was advantageous in terms of low social anxiety and relationships with own-gender peers. For adults who identified with both own- and other-gender peers, we identified additional social benefits (i.e., efficacy and friendships with other-gender peers). Further, we identified a downside to own-gender typicality: individuals who identified only with their own gender had more sexist attitudes than those who identified with the other gender. Findings support the viability of the dual-identity approach in young adults, and have implications for researchers assessing gender typicality across development.

AB - The goal of the current study was to better understand the development of gender typicality in young adulthood by applying the dual-identity approach to gender typicality, previously developed with children, to a university sample. Participants (n = 215, M age = 20.20 years; 62% female) were asked to rate their perceived similarity to both own- and other-gender peers. They also completed questionnaires assessing sexist attitudes, internalized sexualization (females), adherence to male-typed behaviors in the context of interpersonal relationships (males; adherence to physical toughness and restrictive emotional expressivity), gender-based relationship efficacy, friendships, self-esteem, social self-efficacy, and social anxiety. Results indicated that self-perceived gender typicality involves comparisons to both gender groups, and that meaningful typologies can be created based on similarity to own- and other-gender groups. As with children, results indicated that identifying with one’s own gender was advantageous in terms of low social anxiety and relationships with own-gender peers. For adults who identified with both own- and other-gender peers, we identified additional social benefits (i.e., efficacy and friendships with other-gender peers). Further, we identified a downside to own-gender typicality: individuals who identified only with their own gender had more sexist attitudes than those who identified with the other gender. Findings support the viability of the dual-identity approach in young adults, and have implications for researchers assessing gender typicality across development.

KW - Gender typicality

KW - gender typicality

KW - social adjustment

KW - young adults

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063970658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063970658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0165025418811125

DO - 10.1177/0165025418811125

M3 - Article

JO - International Journal of Behavioral Development

JF - International Journal of Behavioral Development

SN - 0165-0254

ER -