Explanation as a Cognitive Process

Zachary Horne, Melis Muradoglu, Andrei Cimpian

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Understanding how people explain is a core task for cognitive science. In this opinion article, we argue that research on explanation would benefit from more engagement with how the cognitive systems involved in generating explanations (e.g., attention, long-term memory) shape the outputs of this process. Although it is clear that these systems do shape explanation, surprisingly little research has investigated how they might do so. We outline the proposed mechanistic approach to explanation and illustrate it with an example: the recent research that suggests explanations exhibit a bias toward inherent information. Taking advantage of what we know about the operating parameters of the human mind is likely to yield new insights into how people come up with explanations.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    JournalTrends in Cognitive Sciences
    DOIs
    StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

    Fingerprint

    Research
    Cognitive Science
    Long-Term Memory

    Keywords

    • attention
    • explanation
    • inherence bias
    • long-term memory
    • metacognition
    • working memory

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
    • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
    • Cognitive Neuroscience

    Cite this

    Explanation as a Cognitive Process. / Horne, Zachary; Muradoglu, Melis; Cimpian, Andrei.

    In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 01.01.2019.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Horne, Zachary ; Muradoglu, Melis ; Cimpian, Andrei. / Explanation as a Cognitive Process. In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2019.
    @article{f86b762774564498b71173cb49310b86,
    title = "Explanation as a Cognitive Process",
    abstract = "Understanding how people explain is a core task for cognitive science. In this opinion article, we argue that research on explanation would benefit from more engagement with how the cognitive systems involved in generating explanations (e.g., attention, long-term memory) shape the outputs of this process. Although it is clear that these systems do shape explanation, surprisingly little research has investigated how they might do so. We outline the proposed mechanistic approach to explanation and illustrate it with an example: the recent research that suggests explanations exhibit a bias toward inherent information. Taking advantage of what we know about the operating parameters of the human mind is likely to yield new insights into how people come up with explanations.",
    keywords = "attention, explanation, inherence bias, long-term memory, metacognition, working memory",
    author = "Zachary Horne and Melis Muradoglu and Andrei Cimpian",
    year = "2019",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.tics.2018.12.004",
    language = "English (US)",
    journal = "Trends in Cognitive Sciences",
    issn = "1364-6613",
    publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Explanation as a Cognitive Process

    AU - Horne, Zachary

    AU - Muradoglu, Melis

    AU - Cimpian, Andrei

    PY - 2019/1/1

    Y1 - 2019/1/1

    N2 - Understanding how people explain is a core task for cognitive science. In this opinion article, we argue that research on explanation would benefit from more engagement with how the cognitive systems involved in generating explanations (e.g., attention, long-term memory) shape the outputs of this process. Although it is clear that these systems do shape explanation, surprisingly little research has investigated how they might do so. We outline the proposed mechanistic approach to explanation and illustrate it with an example: the recent research that suggests explanations exhibit a bias toward inherent information. Taking advantage of what we know about the operating parameters of the human mind is likely to yield new insights into how people come up with explanations.

    AB - Understanding how people explain is a core task for cognitive science. In this opinion article, we argue that research on explanation would benefit from more engagement with how the cognitive systems involved in generating explanations (e.g., attention, long-term memory) shape the outputs of this process. Although it is clear that these systems do shape explanation, surprisingly little research has investigated how they might do so. We outline the proposed mechanistic approach to explanation and illustrate it with an example: the recent research that suggests explanations exhibit a bias toward inherent information. Taking advantage of what we know about the operating parameters of the human mind is likely to yield new insights into how people come up with explanations.

    KW - attention

    KW - explanation

    KW - inherence bias

    KW - long-term memory

    KW - metacognition

    KW - working memory

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059862421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059862421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.tics.2018.12.004

    DO - 10.1016/j.tics.2018.12.004

    M3 - Article

    JO - Trends in Cognitive Sciences

    JF - Trends in Cognitive Sciences

    SN - 1364-6613

    ER -