Explanation as a Cognitive Process

Zachary Horne, Melis Muradoglu, Andrei Cimpian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Understanding how people explain is a core task for cognitive science. In this opinion article, we argue that research on explanation would benefit from more engagement with how the cognitive systems involved in generating explanations (e.g., attention, long-term memory) shape the outputs of this process. Although it is clear that these systems do shape explanation, surprisingly little research has investigated how they might do so. We outline the proposed mechanistic approach to explanation and illustrate it with an example: the recent research that suggests explanations exhibit a bias toward inherent information. Taking advantage of what we know about the operating parameters of the human mind is likely to yield new insights into how people come up with explanations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalTrends in Cognitive Sciences
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Research
Cognitive Science
Long-Term Memory

Keywords

  • attention
  • explanation
  • inherence bias
  • long-term memory
  • metacognition
  • working memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Explanation as a Cognitive Process. / Horne, Zachary; Muradoglu, Melis; Cimpian, Andrei.

In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Horne, Zachary ; Muradoglu, Melis ; Cimpian, Andrei. / Explanation as a Cognitive Process. In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2019.
@article{f86b762774564498b71173cb49310b86,
title = "Explanation as a Cognitive Process",
abstract = "Understanding how people explain is a core task for cognitive science. In this opinion article, we argue that research on explanation would benefit from more engagement with how the cognitive systems involved in generating explanations (e.g., attention, long-term memory) shape the outputs of this process. Although it is clear that these systems do shape explanation, surprisingly little research has investigated how they might do so. We outline the proposed mechanistic approach to explanation and illustrate it with an example: the recent research that suggests explanations exhibit a bias toward inherent information. Taking advantage of what we know about the operating parameters of the human mind is likely to yield new insights into how people come up with explanations.",
keywords = "attention, explanation, inherence bias, long-term memory, metacognition, working memory",
author = "Zachary Horne and Melis Muradoglu and Andrei Cimpian",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.tics.2018.12.004",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Trends in Cognitive Sciences",
issn = "1364-6613",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explanation as a Cognitive Process

AU - Horne, Zachary

AU - Muradoglu, Melis

AU - Cimpian, Andrei

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Understanding how people explain is a core task for cognitive science. In this opinion article, we argue that research on explanation would benefit from more engagement with how the cognitive systems involved in generating explanations (e.g., attention, long-term memory) shape the outputs of this process. Although it is clear that these systems do shape explanation, surprisingly little research has investigated how they might do so. We outline the proposed mechanistic approach to explanation and illustrate it with an example: the recent research that suggests explanations exhibit a bias toward inherent information. Taking advantage of what we know about the operating parameters of the human mind is likely to yield new insights into how people come up with explanations.

AB - Understanding how people explain is a core task for cognitive science. In this opinion article, we argue that research on explanation would benefit from more engagement with how the cognitive systems involved in generating explanations (e.g., attention, long-term memory) shape the outputs of this process. Although it is clear that these systems do shape explanation, surprisingly little research has investigated how they might do so. We outline the proposed mechanistic approach to explanation and illustrate it with an example: the recent research that suggests explanations exhibit a bias toward inherent information. Taking advantage of what we know about the operating parameters of the human mind is likely to yield new insights into how people come up with explanations.

KW - attention

KW - explanation

KW - inherence bias

KW - long-term memory

KW - metacognition

KW - working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059862421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059862421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tics.2018.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.tics.2018.12.004

M3 - Article

JO - Trends in Cognitive Sciences

JF - Trends in Cognitive Sciences

SN - 1364-6613

ER -