Explaining the Tension between the Supreme Court's Embrace of Validity as the Touchstone of Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Lower Courts' (Seeming) Rejection of Same

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

By lopsided majorities, the U.S. Supreme Court, in a series of cases, persistently commanded the lower courts to condition the admission of proffered expert testimony on the demonstrated validity of the proponents’ claims of expertise. In at least one broad area–the so-called forensic sciences–the courts below have largely evaded the Supreme Court's holdings. This paper aims to try to explain this massive defiance by the lower courts in terms of social epistemology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)329-342
Number of pages14
JournalEpisteme
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining the Tension between the Supreme Court's Embrace of Validity as the Touchstone of Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Lower Courts' (Seeming) Rejection of Same'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this