Explaining success and failure in the commons: The configural nature of Ostrom’s institutional design principles

Jacopo A. Baggio, Allain J. Barnett, Irene Perez-Ibara, Ute Brady, Elicia Ratajczyk, Nathan Rollins, Cathy Rubiños, Hoon C. Shin, David J. Yu, Rimjhim Aggarwal, John M. Anderies, Marco A. Janssen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    46 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Governing common pool resources (CPR) in the face of disturbances such as globalization and climate change is challenging. The outcome of any CPR governance regime is the influenced by local combinations of social, institutional, and biophysical factors, as well as cross-scale interdependencies. In this study, we take a step towards understanding multiple-causation of CPR outcomes by analyzing (1) the co-occurrence of design principles (DPs) by activity (irrigation, fishery and forestry), and (2) the combination(s) of DPs leading to social and ecological success. We analyzed 69 cases pertaining to three different activities: irrigation, fishery, and forestry. We find that the importance of the design principles is dependent upon the natural and hard human made infrastructure (i.e. canals, equipment, vessels etc.). For example, clearly defined social boundaries are important when the natural infrastructure is highly mobile (i.e. tuna fish), while monitoring is more important when the natural infrastructure is more static (i.e. forests or water contained within an irrigation system). However, we also find that congruence between local conditions and rules and proportionality between investment and extraction are key for CPR success independent from the natural and human hard made infrastructure. We further provide new visualization techniques for co-occurrence patterns and add to qualitative comparative analysis by introducing a reliability metric to deal with a large meta-analysis dataset on secondary data where information is missing or uncertain.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)417-439
    Number of pages23
    JournalInternational Journal of the Commons
    Volume10
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    irrigation
    infrastructure
    forestry
    fishery
    resources
    proportionality
    visualization
    climate change
    globalization
    governance
    monitoring
    water

    Keywords

    • Common pool resources
    • Comparative case study analysis
    • Coupled infrastructure system
    • Fishery
    • Forestry
    • Governance
    • Irrigation
    • Ostrom design principles
    • QCA
    • Resource mobility
    • Social-ecological system
    • Technology

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Explaining success and failure in the commons : The configural nature of Ostrom’s institutional design principles. / Baggio, Jacopo A.; Barnett, Allain J.; Perez-Ibara, Irene; Brady, Ute; Ratajczyk, Elicia; Rollins, Nathan; Rubiños, Cathy; Shin, Hoon C.; Yu, David J.; Aggarwal, Rimjhim; Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A.

    In: International Journal of the Commons, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2016, p. 417-439.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Baggio, Jacopo A. ; Barnett, Allain J. ; Perez-Ibara, Irene ; Brady, Ute ; Ratajczyk, Elicia ; Rollins, Nathan ; Rubiños, Cathy ; Shin, Hoon C. ; Yu, David J. ; Aggarwal, Rimjhim ; Anderies, John M. ; Janssen, Marco A. / Explaining success and failure in the commons : The configural nature of Ostrom’s institutional design principles. In: International Journal of the Commons. 2016 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 417-439.
    @article{495999f3697c4fb2ad14170093213422,
    title = "Explaining success and failure in the commons: The configural nature of Ostrom’s institutional design principles",
    abstract = "Governing common pool resources (CPR) in the face of disturbances such as globalization and climate change is challenging. The outcome of any CPR governance regime is the influenced by local combinations of social, institutional, and biophysical factors, as well as cross-scale interdependencies. In this study, we take a step towards understanding multiple-causation of CPR outcomes by analyzing (1) the co-occurrence of design principles (DPs) by activity (irrigation, fishery and forestry), and (2) the combination(s) of DPs leading to social and ecological success. We analyzed 69 cases pertaining to three different activities: irrigation, fishery, and forestry. We find that the importance of the design principles is dependent upon the natural and hard human made infrastructure (i.e. canals, equipment, vessels etc.). For example, clearly defined social boundaries are important when the natural infrastructure is highly mobile (i.e. tuna fish), while monitoring is more important when the natural infrastructure is more static (i.e. forests or water contained within an irrigation system). However, we also find that congruence between local conditions and rules and proportionality between investment and extraction are key for CPR success independent from the natural and human hard made infrastructure. We further provide new visualization techniques for co-occurrence patterns and add to qualitative comparative analysis by introducing a reliability metric to deal with a large meta-analysis dataset on secondary data where information is missing or uncertain.",
    keywords = "Common pool resources, Comparative case study analysis, Coupled infrastructure system, Fishery, Forestry, Governance, Irrigation, Ostrom design principles, QCA, Resource mobility, Social-ecological system, Technology",
    author = "Baggio, {Jacopo A.} and Barnett, {Allain J.} and Irene Perez-Ibara and Ute Brady and Elicia Ratajczyk and Nathan Rollins and Cathy Rubi{\~n}os and Shin, {Hoon C.} and Yu, {David J.} and Rimjhim Aggarwal and Anderies, {John M.} and Janssen, {Marco A.}",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.18352/ijc.634",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "10",
    pages = "417--439",
    journal = "International Journal of the Commons",
    issn = "1875-0281",
    publisher = "International Association for the Study of the Commons",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Explaining success and failure in the commons

    T2 - The configural nature of Ostrom’s institutional design principles

    AU - Baggio, Jacopo A.

    AU - Barnett, Allain J.

    AU - Perez-Ibara, Irene

    AU - Brady, Ute

    AU - Ratajczyk, Elicia

    AU - Rollins, Nathan

    AU - Rubiños, Cathy

    AU - Shin, Hoon C.

    AU - Yu, David J.

    AU - Aggarwal, Rimjhim

    AU - Anderies, John M.

    AU - Janssen, Marco A.

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - Governing common pool resources (CPR) in the face of disturbances such as globalization and climate change is challenging. The outcome of any CPR governance regime is the influenced by local combinations of social, institutional, and biophysical factors, as well as cross-scale interdependencies. In this study, we take a step towards understanding multiple-causation of CPR outcomes by analyzing (1) the co-occurrence of design principles (DPs) by activity (irrigation, fishery and forestry), and (2) the combination(s) of DPs leading to social and ecological success. We analyzed 69 cases pertaining to three different activities: irrigation, fishery, and forestry. We find that the importance of the design principles is dependent upon the natural and hard human made infrastructure (i.e. canals, equipment, vessels etc.). For example, clearly defined social boundaries are important when the natural infrastructure is highly mobile (i.e. tuna fish), while monitoring is more important when the natural infrastructure is more static (i.e. forests or water contained within an irrigation system). However, we also find that congruence between local conditions and rules and proportionality between investment and extraction are key for CPR success independent from the natural and human hard made infrastructure. We further provide new visualization techniques for co-occurrence patterns and add to qualitative comparative analysis by introducing a reliability metric to deal with a large meta-analysis dataset on secondary data where information is missing or uncertain.

    AB - Governing common pool resources (CPR) in the face of disturbances such as globalization and climate change is challenging. The outcome of any CPR governance regime is the influenced by local combinations of social, institutional, and biophysical factors, as well as cross-scale interdependencies. In this study, we take a step towards understanding multiple-causation of CPR outcomes by analyzing (1) the co-occurrence of design principles (DPs) by activity (irrigation, fishery and forestry), and (2) the combination(s) of DPs leading to social and ecological success. We analyzed 69 cases pertaining to three different activities: irrigation, fishery, and forestry. We find that the importance of the design principles is dependent upon the natural and hard human made infrastructure (i.e. canals, equipment, vessels etc.). For example, clearly defined social boundaries are important when the natural infrastructure is highly mobile (i.e. tuna fish), while monitoring is more important when the natural infrastructure is more static (i.e. forests or water contained within an irrigation system). However, we also find that congruence between local conditions and rules and proportionality between investment and extraction are key for CPR success independent from the natural and human hard made infrastructure. We further provide new visualization techniques for co-occurrence patterns and add to qualitative comparative analysis by introducing a reliability metric to deal with a large meta-analysis dataset on secondary data where information is missing or uncertain.

    KW - Common pool resources

    KW - Comparative case study analysis

    KW - Coupled infrastructure system

    KW - Fishery

    KW - Forestry

    KW - Governance

    KW - Irrigation

    KW - Ostrom design principles

    KW - QCA

    KW - Resource mobility

    KW - Social-ecological system

    KW - Technology

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992051994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992051994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.18352/ijc.634

    DO - 10.18352/ijc.634

    M3 - Article

    VL - 10

    SP - 417

    EP - 439

    JO - International Journal of the Commons

    JF - International Journal of the Commons

    SN - 1875-0281

    IS - 2

    ER -