Explaining success and failure in the commons

The configural nature of Ostrom’s institutional design principles

Jacopo A. Baggio, Allain J. Barnett, Irene Perez-Ibara, Ute Brady, Elicia Ratajczyk, Nathan Rollins, Cathy Rubiños, Hoon C. Shin, David J. Yu, Rimjhim Aggarwal, John M. Anderies, Marco A. Janssen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Governing common pool resources (CPR) in the face of disturbances such as globalization and climate change is challenging. The outcome of any CPR governance regime is the influenced by local combinations of social, institutional, and biophysical factors, as well as cross-scale interdependencies. In this study, we take a step towards understanding multiple-causation of CPR outcomes by analyzing (1) the co-occurrence of design principles (DPs) by activity (irrigation, fishery and forestry), and (2) the combination(s) of DPs leading to social and ecological success. We analyzed 69 cases pertaining to three different activities: irrigation, fishery, and forestry. We find that the importance of the design principles is dependent upon the natural and hard human made infrastructure (i.e. canals, equipment, vessels etc.). For example, clearly defined social boundaries are important when the natural infrastructure is highly mobile (i.e. tuna fish), while monitoring is more important when the natural infrastructure is more static (i.e. forests or water contained within an irrigation system). However, we also find that congruence between local conditions and rules and proportionality between investment and extraction are key for CPR success independent from the natural and human hard made infrastructure. We further provide new visualization techniques for co-occurrence patterns and add to qualitative comparative analysis by introducing a reliability metric to deal with a large meta-analysis dataset on secondary data where information is missing or uncertain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)417-439
Number of pages23
JournalInternational Journal of the Commons
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

irrigation
infrastructure
forestry
fishery
resources
proportionality
visualization
climate change
globalization
governance
monitoring
water

Keywords

  • Common pool resources
  • Comparative case study analysis
  • Coupled infrastructure system
  • Fishery
  • Forestry
  • Governance
  • Irrigation
  • Ostrom design principles
  • QCA
  • Resource mobility
  • Social-ecological system
  • Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Explaining success and failure in the commons : The configural nature of Ostrom’s institutional design principles. / Baggio, Jacopo A.; Barnett, Allain J.; Perez-Ibara, Irene; Brady, Ute; Ratajczyk, Elicia; Rollins, Nathan; Rubiños, Cathy; Shin, Hoon C.; Yu, David J.; Aggarwal, Rimjhim; Anderies, John M.; Janssen, Marco A.

In: International Journal of the Commons, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2016, p. 417-439.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baggio, Jacopo A. ; Barnett, Allain J. ; Perez-Ibara, Irene ; Brady, Ute ; Ratajczyk, Elicia ; Rollins, Nathan ; Rubiños, Cathy ; Shin, Hoon C. ; Yu, David J. ; Aggarwal, Rimjhim ; Anderies, John M. ; Janssen, Marco A. / Explaining success and failure in the commons : The configural nature of Ostrom’s institutional design principles. In: International Journal of the Commons. 2016 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 417-439.
@article{495999f3697c4fb2ad14170093213422,
title = "Explaining success and failure in the commons: The configural nature of Ostrom’s institutional design principles",
abstract = "Governing common pool resources (CPR) in the face of disturbances such as globalization and climate change is challenging. The outcome of any CPR governance regime is the influenced by local combinations of social, institutional, and biophysical factors, as well as cross-scale interdependencies. In this study, we take a step towards understanding multiple-causation of CPR outcomes by analyzing (1) the co-occurrence of design principles (DPs) by activity (irrigation, fishery and forestry), and (2) the combination(s) of DPs leading to social and ecological success. We analyzed 69 cases pertaining to three different activities: irrigation, fishery, and forestry. We find that the importance of the design principles is dependent upon the natural and hard human made infrastructure (i.e. canals, equipment, vessels etc.). For example, clearly defined social boundaries are important when the natural infrastructure is highly mobile (i.e. tuna fish), while monitoring is more important when the natural infrastructure is more static (i.e. forests or water contained within an irrigation system). However, we also find that congruence between local conditions and rules and proportionality between investment and extraction are key for CPR success independent from the natural and human hard made infrastructure. We further provide new visualization techniques for co-occurrence patterns and add to qualitative comparative analysis by introducing a reliability metric to deal with a large meta-analysis dataset on secondary data where information is missing or uncertain.",
keywords = "Common pool resources, Comparative case study analysis, Coupled infrastructure system, Fishery, Forestry, Governance, Irrigation, Ostrom design principles, QCA, Resource mobility, Social-ecological system, Technology",
author = "Baggio, {Jacopo A.} and Barnett, {Allain J.} and Irene Perez-Ibara and Ute Brady and Elicia Ratajczyk and Nathan Rollins and Cathy Rubi{\~n}os and Shin, {Hoon C.} and Yu, {David J.} and Rimjhim Aggarwal and Anderies, {John M.} and Janssen, {Marco A.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.18352/ijc.634",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "417--439",
journal = "International Journal of the Commons",
issn = "1875-0281",
publisher = "International Association for the Study of the Commons",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining success and failure in the commons

T2 - The configural nature of Ostrom’s institutional design principles

AU - Baggio, Jacopo A.

AU - Barnett, Allain J.

AU - Perez-Ibara, Irene

AU - Brady, Ute

AU - Ratajczyk, Elicia

AU - Rollins, Nathan

AU - Rubiños, Cathy

AU - Shin, Hoon C.

AU - Yu, David J.

AU - Aggarwal, Rimjhim

AU - Anderies, John M.

AU - Janssen, Marco A.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Governing common pool resources (CPR) in the face of disturbances such as globalization and climate change is challenging. The outcome of any CPR governance regime is the influenced by local combinations of social, institutional, and biophysical factors, as well as cross-scale interdependencies. In this study, we take a step towards understanding multiple-causation of CPR outcomes by analyzing (1) the co-occurrence of design principles (DPs) by activity (irrigation, fishery and forestry), and (2) the combination(s) of DPs leading to social and ecological success. We analyzed 69 cases pertaining to three different activities: irrigation, fishery, and forestry. We find that the importance of the design principles is dependent upon the natural and hard human made infrastructure (i.e. canals, equipment, vessels etc.). For example, clearly defined social boundaries are important when the natural infrastructure is highly mobile (i.e. tuna fish), while monitoring is more important when the natural infrastructure is more static (i.e. forests or water contained within an irrigation system). However, we also find that congruence between local conditions and rules and proportionality between investment and extraction are key for CPR success independent from the natural and human hard made infrastructure. We further provide new visualization techniques for co-occurrence patterns and add to qualitative comparative analysis by introducing a reliability metric to deal with a large meta-analysis dataset on secondary data where information is missing or uncertain.

AB - Governing common pool resources (CPR) in the face of disturbances such as globalization and climate change is challenging. The outcome of any CPR governance regime is the influenced by local combinations of social, institutional, and biophysical factors, as well as cross-scale interdependencies. In this study, we take a step towards understanding multiple-causation of CPR outcomes by analyzing (1) the co-occurrence of design principles (DPs) by activity (irrigation, fishery and forestry), and (2) the combination(s) of DPs leading to social and ecological success. We analyzed 69 cases pertaining to three different activities: irrigation, fishery, and forestry. We find that the importance of the design principles is dependent upon the natural and hard human made infrastructure (i.e. canals, equipment, vessels etc.). For example, clearly defined social boundaries are important when the natural infrastructure is highly mobile (i.e. tuna fish), while monitoring is more important when the natural infrastructure is more static (i.e. forests or water contained within an irrigation system). However, we also find that congruence between local conditions and rules and proportionality between investment and extraction are key for CPR success independent from the natural and human hard made infrastructure. We further provide new visualization techniques for co-occurrence patterns and add to qualitative comparative analysis by introducing a reliability metric to deal with a large meta-analysis dataset on secondary data where information is missing or uncertain.

KW - Common pool resources

KW - Comparative case study analysis

KW - Coupled infrastructure system

KW - Fishery

KW - Forestry

KW - Governance

KW - Irrigation

KW - Ostrom design principles

KW - QCA

KW - Resource mobility

KW - Social-ecological system

KW - Technology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992051994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992051994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18352/ijc.634

DO - 10.18352/ijc.634

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 417

EP - 439

JO - International Journal of the Commons

JF - International Journal of the Commons

SN - 1875-0281

IS - 2

ER -