Explaining procedural justice during police-suspect encounters: A systematic social observation study

John D. McCluskey, Michael Reisig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop and test a series of hypotheses regarding the use of procedurally just policing during suspect encounters. Design/methodology/approach: Systematic social observation data from police encounters with suspects are used (N=939). Ordinary least-squares regression models are estimated to evaluate the effects of four variable clusters (i.e. suspect self-presentation, situational factors, suspect social characteristics, and officer characteristics) on procedurally just policing practices. Findings: Results from the regression models show that the most salient predictors of police officers exercising authority in a procedurally just manner include the level of self-control displayed by suspects, the number of citizen onlookers, whether the encounter involved a traffic problem, the race/ethnicity of suspects, and suspects’ social status. Research limitations/implications: This study focused only on police-suspects encounters where compliance requests were made. While the size of the sample is relatively large, the results from this study do not generalize to all types of police encounters with members of the public. Originality/value: This research adds to an emerging body of research focused on predicting procedurally just practices in police encounters. The findings support increased attention to theories that explain police-citizens interactions, and also indicate that further consideration to the measurement of police behavior is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)574-586
Number of pages13
JournalPolicing
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Police
police
justice
Observation
citizen
regression
Research
self-presentation
self-control
police officer
Least-Squares Analysis
social status
Sample Size
Compliance
ethnicity
traffic
methodology
interaction
Values

Keywords

  • Procedural justice
  • Process-based model
  • Systematic social observation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Explaining procedural justice during police-suspect encounters : A systematic social observation study. / McCluskey, John D.; Reisig, Michael.

In: Policing, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2017, p. 574-586.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9f7af5a1cbb24e5bb45d6d3f8e6d1c71,
title = "Explaining procedural justice during police-suspect encounters: A systematic social observation study",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop and test a series of hypotheses regarding the use of procedurally just policing during suspect encounters. Design/methodology/approach: Systematic social observation data from police encounters with suspects are used (N=939). Ordinary least-squares regression models are estimated to evaluate the effects of four variable clusters (i.e. suspect self-presentation, situational factors, suspect social characteristics, and officer characteristics) on procedurally just policing practices. Findings: Results from the regression models show that the most salient predictors of police officers exercising authority in a procedurally just manner include the level of self-control displayed by suspects, the number of citizen onlookers, whether the encounter involved a traffic problem, the race/ethnicity of suspects, and suspects’ social status. Research limitations/implications: This study focused only on police-suspects encounters where compliance requests were made. While the size of the sample is relatively large, the results from this study do not generalize to all types of police encounters with members of the public. Originality/value: This research adds to an emerging body of research focused on predicting procedurally just practices in police encounters. The findings support increased attention to theories that explain police-citizens interactions, and also indicate that further consideration to the measurement of police behavior is warranted.",
keywords = "Procedural justice, Process-based model, Systematic social observation",
author = "McCluskey, {John D.} and Michael Reisig",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1108/PIJPSM-06-2016-0087",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "574--586",
journal = "Policing",
issn = "1363-951X",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining procedural justice during police-suspect encounters

T2 - A systematic social observation study

AU - McCluskey, John D.

AU - Reisig, Michael

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop and test a series of hypotheses regarding the use of procedurally just policing during suspect encounters. Design/methodology/approach: Systematic social observation data from police encounters with suspects are used (N=939). Ordinary least-squares regression models are estimated to evaluate the effects of four variable clusters (i.e. suspect self-presentation, situational factors, suspect social characteristics, and officer characteristics) on procedurally just policing practices. Findings: Results from the regression models show that the most salient predictors of police officers exercising authority in a procedurally just manner include the level of self-control displayed by suspects, the number of citizen onlookers, whether the encounter involved a traffic problem, the race/ethnicity of suspects, and suspects’ social status. Research limitations/implications: This study focused only on police-suspects encounters where compliance requests were made. While the size of the sample is relatively large, the results from this study do not generalize to all types of police encounters with members of the public. Originality/value: This research adds to an emerging body of research focused on predicting procedurally just practices in police encounters. The findings support increased attention to theories that explain police-citizens interactions, and also indicate that further consideration to the measurement of police behavior is warranted.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop and test a series of hypotheses regarding the use of procedurally just policing during suspect encounters. Design/methodology/approach: Systematic social observation data from police encounters with suspects are used (N=939). Ordinary least-squares regression models are estimated to evaluate the effects of four variable clusters (i.e. suspect self-presentation, situational factors, suspect social characteristics, and officer characteristics) on procedurally just policing practices. Findings: Results from the regression models show that the most salient predictors of police officers exercising authority in a procedurally just manner include the level of self-control displayed by suspects, the number of citizen onlookers, whether the encounter involved a traffic problem, the race/ethnicity of suspects, and suspects’ social status. Research limitations/implications: This study focused only on police-suspects encounters where compliance requests were made. While the size of the sample is relatively large, the results from this study do not generalize to all types of police encounters with members of the public. Originality/value: This research adds to an emerging body of research focused on predicting procedurally just practices in police encounters. The findings support increased attention to theories that explain police-citizens interactions, and also indicate that further consideration to the measurement of police behavior is warranted.

KW - Procedural justice

KW - Process-based model

KW - Systematic social observation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026405457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026405457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/PIJPSM-06-2016-0087

DO - 10.1108/PIJPSM-06-2016-0087

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85026405457

VL - 40

SP - 574

EP - 586

JO - Policing

JF - Policing

SN - 1363-951X

IS - 3

ER -