Explaining 'pain and suffering' awards: The role of injury characteristics and fault attributions

Roselle L. Wissler, David L. Evans, Allen J. Hart, Marian M. Morry, Michael J. Saks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

49 Scopus citations

Abstract

The present research explored factors thought to affect compensatory awards for non-economic harm ('pain and suffering') in personal injury cases. Experiment 1 showed that the nature and severity of the plaintiff's injury had a strong effect on perceptions of the extent of harm suffered and on award amounts. The parties' relatively active or passive roles in causing the injury affected assessments of their degree of fault, but perceived fault had little influence on awards. Experiment 2 replicated with more varied cases the strong impact of injury severity on harm perception and on awards for pain and suffering. In both studies, the disability and the mental suffering associated with injuries were stronger predictors of awards than were pain and disfigurement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)181-207
Number of pages27
JournalLaw and human behavior
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining 'pain and suffering' awards: The role of injury characteristics and fault attributions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this