TY - JOUR
T1 - Expert Predictions of Societal Change
T2 - Insights From the World After COVID Project
AU - Grossmann, Igor
AU - Twardus, Oliver
AU - Varnum, Michael E.W.
AU - Jayawickreme, Eranda
AU - McLevey, John
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Insight Grant 435-2014-0685, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Connection Grant 611-2020-0190, a donation from the Templeton World Charity Foundation, and Early Researcher Award ER16-12-169 from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation to Igor Grossmann. We thank Mane Kara-Yakoubian, Chelsea Chen, and Tianrong Sun for assistance coding open-ended narratives. All materials, code, and secondary analyses are available in the project’s public repository on Github (github.com/grossmania/wac).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021. American Psychological Association
PY - 2021/11/22
Y1 - 2021/11/22
N2 - How do experts in human behavior think the world might change after the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic? What advice do they have for the postpandemic world? Is there a consensus on the most significant psychological and societal changes ahead? To answer these questions, we analyzed interviews from the World After COVID Project—reflections of more than 50 of the world’s top behavioral and social science experts, including fellows of National Academies and presidents of major scientific societies. These experts independently shared their thoughts on possible psychological changes in society in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic and provided recommendations how to respond to the new challenges and opportunities these shifts may bring. We distilled these predictions and suggestions via human-coded analyses and natural language processing techniques. In general, experts showed little overlap in their predictions, except for convergence on a set of social/societal themes (e.g., greater appreciation for social connection, increasing political conflict). Half of the experts approached their post-COVID predictions dialectically, highlighting both positive and negative features of the same domain of change, and many expressed uncertainty in their predictions. The project offers a time capsule of experts’ predictions for the effects of the pandemic on a wide range of outcomes. We discuss the implications of heterogeneity in these predictions, the value of uncertainty and dialecticism in forecasting, and the value of balancing explanation with predictions in expert psychological judgment.
AB - How do experts in human behavior think the world might change after the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic? What advice do they have for the postpandemic world? Is there a consensus on the most significant psychological and societal changes ahead? To answer these questions, we analyzed interviews from the World After COVID Project—reflections of more than 50 of the world’s top behavioral and social science experts, including fellows of National Academies and presidents of major scientific societies. These experts independently shared their thoughts on possible psychological changes in society in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic and provided recommendations how to respond to the new challenges and opportunities these shifts may bring. We distilled these predictions and suggestions via human-coded analyses and natural language processing techniques. In general, experts showed little overlap in their predictions, except for convergence on a set of social/societal themes (e.g., greater appreciation for social connection, increasing political conflict). Half of the experts approached their post-COVID predictions dialectically, highlighting both positive and negative features of the same domain of change, and many expressed uncertainty in their predictions. The project offers a time capsule of experts’ predictions for the effects of the pandemic on a wide range of outcomes. We discuss the implications of heterogeneity in these predictions, the value of uncertainty and dialecticism in forecasting, and the value of balancing explanation with predictions in expert psychological judgment.
KW - Covid-19
KW - Cultural change
KW - Expert judgment
KW - Forecasting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120862845&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120862845&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/amp0000903
DO - 10.1037/amp0000903
M3 - Article
C2 - 34807633
AN - SCOPUS:85120862845
VL - 77
SP - 276
EP - 290
JO - American Psychologist
JF - American Psychologist
SN - 0003-066X
IS - 2
ER -