Experiments in concept modeling for radiographic image reports

Douglas S. Bell, Edward Pattison-Gordon, Robert Greenes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Development of methods for building concept models to support structured data entry and image retrieval in chest radiography. Design: An organizing model for chest-radiographic reporting was built by analyzing manually a set of natural-language chest-radiograph reports. During model building, clinician-informaticians judged alternative conceptual structures according to four criteria: content of clinically relevant detail, provision for semantic constraints, provision for canonical forms, and simplicity. The organizing model was applied in representing three sample reports in their entirety. To explore the potential for automatic model discovery, the representation of one sample report was compared with the noun phrases derived from the same report by the CLARIT natural-language processing system. Results: The organizing model for chest-radiographic reporting consists of 62 concept types and 17 relations, arranged in an inheritance network. The broadest types in the model include FINDING, ANATOMIC LOCUS, PROCEDURE, ATTRIBUTE, and STATUS. Diagnoses are modeled as a subtype of FINDING. Representing three sample reports in their entirety added 79 narrower concept types. Some CLARIT noun phrases suggested valid associations among subtypes of FINDING, STATUS, and ANATOMIC LOCUS. Conclusions: A manual modeling process utilizing explicitly stated criteria for making modeling decisions produced an organizing model that showed consistency in early testing. A combination of top-down and bottom-up modeling was required. Natural-language processing may inform model building, but algorithms that would replace manual modeling were not discovered. Further progress in modeling will require methods for objective model evaluation and tools for formalizing the model-building process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)249-262
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume1
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Thorax
Natural Language Processing
Decision Support Techniques
Semantics
Radiography
Decision Making
Language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Experiments in concept modeling for radiographic image reports. / Bell, Douglas S.; Pattison-Gordon, Edward; Greenes, Robert.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 1, No. 3, 05.1994, p. 249-262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{47c8423200eb4dc59dcfc3aeb4a6a8d7,
title = "Experiments in concept modeling for radiographic image reports",
abstract = "Objective: Development of methods for building concept models to support structured data entry and image retrieval in chest radiography. Design: An organizing model for chest-radiographic reporting was built by analyzing manually a set of natural-language chest-radiograph reports. During model building, clinician-informaticians judged alternative conceptual structures according to four criteria: content of clinically relevant detail, provision for semantic constraints, provision for canonical forms, and simplicity. The organizing model was applied in representing three sample reports in their entirety. To explore the potential for automatic model discovery, the representation of one sample report was compared with the noun phrases derived from the same report by the CLARIT natural-language processing system. Results: The organizing model for chest-radiographic reporting consists of 62 concept types and 17 relations, arranged in an inheritance network. The broadest types in the model include FINDING, ANATOMIC LOCUS, PROCEDURE, ATTRIBUTE, and STATUS. Diagnoses are modeled as a subtype of FINDING. Representing three sample reports in their entirety added 79 narrower concept types. Some CLARIT noun phrases suggested valid associations among subtypes of FINDING, STATUS, and ANATOMIC LOCUS. Conclusions: A manual modeling process utilizing explicitly stated criteria for making modeling decisions produced an organizing model that showed consistency in early testing. A combination of top-down and bottom-up modeling was required. Natural-language processing may inform model building, but algorithms that would replace manual modeling were not discovered. Further progress in modeling will require methods for objective model evaluation and tools for formalizing the model-building process.",
author = "Bell, {Douglas S.} and Edward Pattison-Gordon and Robert Greenes",
year = "1994",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "249--262",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experiments in concept modeling for radiographic image reports

AU - Bell, Douglas S.

AU - Pattison-Gordon, Edward

AU - Greenes, Robert

PY - 1994/5

Y1 - 1994/5

N2 - Objective: Development of methods for building concept models to support structured data entry and image retrieval in chest radiography. Design: An organizing model for chest-radiographic reporting was built by analyzing manually a set of natural-language chest-radiograph reports. During model building, clinician-informaticians judged alternative conceptual structures according to four criteria: content of clinically relevant detail, provision for semantic constraints, provision for canonical forms, and simplicity. The organizing model was applied in representing three sample reports in their entirety. To explore the potential for automatic model discovery, the representation of one sample report was compared with the noun phrases derived from the same report by the CLARIT natural-language processing system. Results: The organizing model for chest-radiographic reporting consists of 62 concept types and 17 relations, arranged in an inheritance network. The broadest types in the model include FINDING, ANATOMIC LOCUS, PROCEDURE, ATTRIBUTE, and STATUS. Diagnoses are modeled as a subtype of FINDING. Representing three sample reports in their entirety added 79 narrower concept types. Some CLARIT noun phrases suggested valid associations among subtypes of FINDING, STATUS, and ANATOMIC LOCUS. Conclusions: A manual modeling process utilizing explicitly stated criteria for making modeling decisions produced an organizing model that showed consistency in early testing. A combination of top-down and bottom-up modeling was required. Natural-language processing may inform model building, but algorithms that would replace manual modeling were not discovered. Further progress in modeling will require methods for objective model evaluation and tools for formalizing the model-building process.

AB - Objective: Development of methods for building concept models to support structured data entry and image retrieval in chest radiography. Design: An organizing model for chest-radiographic reporting was built by analyzing manually a set of natural-language chest-radiograph reports. During model building, clinician-informaticians judged alternative conceptual structures according to four criteria: content of clinically relevant detail, provision for semantic constraints, provision for canonical forms, and simplicity. The organizing model was applied in representing three sample reports in their entirety. To explore the potential for automatic model discovery, the representation of one sample report was compared with the noun phrases derived from the same report by the CLARIT natural-language processing system. Results: The organizing model for chest-radiographic reporting consists of 62 concept types and 17 relations, arranged in an inheritance network. The broadest types in the model include FINDING, ANATOMIC LOCUS, PROCEDURE, ATTRIBUTE, and STATUS. Diagnoses are modeled as a subtype of FINDING. Representing three sample reports in their entirety added 79 narrower concept types. Some CLARIT noun phrases suggested valid associations among subtypes of FINDING, STATUS, and ANATOMIC LOCUS. Conclusions: A manual modeling process utilizing explicitly stated criteria for making modeling decisions produced an organizing model that showed consistency in early testing. A combination of top-down and bottom-up modeling was required. Natural-language processing may inform model building, but algorithms that would replace manual modeling were not discovered. Further progress in modeling will require methods for objective model evaluation and tools for formalizing the model-building process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028440927&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028440927&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7719807

AN - SCOPUS:0028440927

VL - 1

SP - 249

EP - 262

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 3

ER -