Experiments and theory of the nonexponential relaxation in liquids, glasses, polymers and crystals

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

More than 130 years ago it was first recognized that the observed response from many diverse substances may exhibit two distinct types of nonexponential relaxation. Although the Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts (KWW) stretched exponential and Curie-von Schweidler (CvS) power law have since been used to characterize the observed response from thousands of measurements, there is still no commonly accepted explanation for these empirical formulas. Only in the past few years have there been experimental techniques developed to answer the most basic question about the observed response: is it homogeneous where all regions of the sample exhibit intrinsic nonexponential behavior, or is it a result of a heterogeneous distribution of relaxation times? One technique, nonresonant spectral hole burning (NSHB), uses a large amplitude, low-frequency electric- or magnetic-field to selectively investigate the constituents in the net spectrum of response. An important advantage of NSHB is that the responding degrees of freedom are used directly as their own local probe. For all systems examined so far, including amorphous and crystalline materials, the nonexponential relaxation is found to result from a distribution of relaxation times. This raises the theoretical questions: why are there two types of nonexponential behavior, and why are they so "universal"? A possible answer comes from a mesoscopic model for nonexponential relaxation that provides a common physical basis for both universalities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)169-209
Number of pages41
JournalPhase Transitions
Volume65
Issue number1-4
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Relaxation time
Polymers
Glass
Crystals
glass
hole burning
polymers
Liquids
liquids
crystals
relaxation time
Experiments
Electric fields
Magnetic fields
Crystalline materials
amorphous materials
degrees of freedom
low frequencies
electric fields
probes

Keywords

  • Heterogeneous response
  • Nonexponential relaxation
  • Spectral hole burning
  • Supercooled liquids

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Condensed Matter Physics

Cite this

Experiments and theory of the nonexponential relaxation in liquids, glasses, polymers and crystals. / Chamberlin, Ralph.

In: Phase Transitions, Vol. 65, No. 1-4, 1998, p. 169-209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d0d16353188849038454465c098e281b,
title = "Experiments and theory of the nonexponential relaxation in liquids, glasses, polymers and crystals",
abstract = "More than 130 years ago it was first recognized that the observed response from many diverse substances may exhibit two distinct types of nonexponential relaxation. Although the Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts (KWW) stretched exponential and Curie-von Schweidler (CvS) power law have since been used to characterize the observed response from thousands of measurements, there is still no commonly accepted explanation for these empirical formulas. Only in the past few years have there been experimental techniques developed to answer the most basic question about the observed response: is it homogeneous where all regions of the sample exhibit intrinsic nonexponential behavior, or is it a result of a heterogeneous distribution of relaxation times? One technique, nonresonant spectral hole burning (NSHB), uses a large amplitude, low-frequency electric- or magnetic-field to selectively investigate the constituents in the net spectrum of response. An important advantage of NSHB is that the responding degrees of freedom are used directly as their own local probe. For all systems examined so far, including amorphous and crystalline materials, the nonexponential relaxation is found to result from a distribution of relaxation times. This raises the theoretical questions: why are there two types of nonexponential behavior, and why are they so {"}universal{"}? A possible answer comes from a mesoscopic model for nonexponential relaxation that provides a common physical basis for both universalities.",
keywords = "Heterogeneous response, Nonexponential relaxation, Spectral hole burning, Supercooled liquids",
author = "Ralph Chamberlin",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "169--209",
journal = "Phase Transitions",
issn = "0141-1594",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experiments and theory of the nonexponential relaxation in liquids, glasses, polymers and crystals

AU - Chamberlin, Ralph

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - More than 130 years ago it was first recognized that the observed response from many diverse substances may exhibit two distinct types of nonexponential relaxation. Although the Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts (KWW) stretched exponential and Curie-von Schweidler (CvS) power law have since been used to characterize the observed response from thousands of measurements, there is still no commonly accepted explanation for these empirical formulas. Only in the past few years have there been experimental techniques developed to answer the most basic question about the observed response: is it homogeneous where all regions of the sample exhibit intrinsic nonexponential behavior, or is it a result of a heterogeneous distribution of relaxation times? One technique, nonresonant spectral hole burning (NSHB), uses a large amplitude, low-frequency electric- or magnetic-field to selectively investigate the constituents in the net spectrum of response. An important advantage of NSHB is that the responding degrees of freedom are used directly as their own local probe. For all systems examined so far, including amorphous and crystalline materials, the nonexponential relaxation is found to result from a distribution of relaxation times. This raises the theoretical questions: why are there two types of nonexponential behavior, and why are they so "universal"? A possible answer comes from a mesoscopic model for nonexponential relaxation that provides a common physical basis for both universalities.

AB - More than 130 years ago it was first recognized that the observed response from many diverse substances may exhibit two distinct types of nonexponential relaxation. Although the Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts (KWW) stretched exponential and Curie-von Schweidler (CvS) power law have since been used to characterize the observed response from thousands of measurements, there is still no commonly accepted explanation for these empirical formulas. Only in the past few years have there been experimental techniques developed to answer the most basic question about the observed response: is it homogeneous where all regions of the sample exhibit intrinsic nonexponential behavior, or is it a result of a heterogeneous distribution of relaxation times? One technique, nonresonant spectral hole burning (NSHB), uses a large amplitude, low-frequency electric- or magnetic-field to selectively investigate the constituents in the net spectrum of response. An important advantage of NSHB is that the responding degrees of freedom are used directly as their own local probe. For all systems examined so far, including amorphous and crystalline materials, the nonexponential relaxation is found to result from a distribution of relaxation times. This raises the theoretical questions: why are there two types of nonexponential behavior, and why are they so "universal"? A possible answer comes from a mesoscopic model for nonexponential relaxation that provides a common physical basis for both universalities.

KW - Heterogeneous response

KW - Nonexponential relaxation

KW - Spectral hole burning

KW - Supercooled liquids

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=26444449630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=26444449630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:26444449630

VL - 65

SP - 169

EP - 209

JO - Phase Transitions

JF - Phase Transitions

SN - 0141-1594

IS - 1-4

ER -