Experimental investigation of the step form-feature information model

J. J. Shah, A. Mathew

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Exchanging product data between feature-based geometric modelers presents some challenges. This is partly because features technology is still evolving, and also because there are major philosophical differences between the feature concepts on which different systems are based. The Form Feature Information Model (FFIM) that was developed by the pdes committee in the USA and accepted into the International Standards Organisation step standard was tested by means of experiments described in the paper. The modeler used in the experiments was the ASU Features Testbed, which was developed at the Arizona State University, USA, independently of the FFIM. The purpose of the experiments was to identify problems in the FFIM, and to suggest solutions where possible. In addition to the traditional problems of data transfer, such as numerical inaccuracies, a number of other factors that increase the complexity of the feature data-exchange process were identified. Some of these were the lack of relational positioning/locating information, multiple representations of a single feature, representation of certain popular profiles in rather tedious data structures, and the nonunique mapping of features between the two systems. The loss of semantic information, ecapsulated in rules, methods and constraints, seems to place some serious limits on information that can be exchanged with the current version of the FFIM. The pdes/step models are essentially static snapshots that are adequate for exchanging geometric and topological data, but are insufficient for dynamic exchange of feature models that encode engineering semantics in addition to geometric shapes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)282-296
Number of pages15
JournalComputer-Aided Design
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991

Fingerprint

Experimental Investigation
Semantics
Model
Experiment
Experiments
Electronic data interchange
Data transfer
Testbeds
Feature Model
Data Exchange
Snapshot
Data Transfer
Data structures
Form
Testbed
Positioning
Data Structures
Engineering

Keywords

  • features
  • graphics standards
  • pdes
  • step

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Geometry and Topology

Cite this

Experimental investigation of the step form-feature information model. / Shah, J. J.; Mathew, A.

In: Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1991, p. 282-296.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shah, J. J. ; Mathew, A. / Experimental investigation of the step form-feature information model. In: Computer-Aided Design. 1991 ; Vol. 23, No. 4. pp. 282-296.
@article{b0dedbd427de47678ea9853744052883,
title = "Experimental investigation of the step form-feature information model",
abstract = "Exchanging product data between feature-based geometric modelers presents some challenges. This is partly because features technology is still evolving, and also because there are major philosophical differences between the feature concepts on which different systems are based. The Form Feature Information Model (FFIM) that was developed by the pdes committee in the USA and accepted into the International Standards Organisation step standard was tested by means of experiments described in the paper. The modeler used in the experiments was the ASU Features Testbed, which was developed at the Arizona State University, USA, independently of the FFIM. The purpose of the experiments was to identify problems in the FFIM, and to suggest solutions where possible. In addition to the traditional problems of data transfer, such as numerical inaccuracies, a number of other factors that increase the complexity of the feature data-exchange process were identified. Some of these were the lack of relational positioning/locating information, multiple representations of a single feature, representation of certain popular profiles in rather tedious data structures, and the nonunique mapping of features between the two systems. The loss of semantic information, ecapsulated in rules, methods and constraints, seems to place some serious limits on information that can be exchanged with the current version of the FFIM. The pdes/step models are essentially static snapshots that are adequate for exchanging geometric and topological data, but are insufficient for dynamic exchange of feature models that encode engineering semantics in addition to geometric shapes.",
keywords = "features, graphics standards, pdes, step",
author = "Shah, {J. J.} and A. Mathew",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1016/0010-4485(91)90068-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "282--296",
journal = "CAD Computer Aided Design",
issn = "0010-4485",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experimental investigation of the step form-feature information model

AU - Shah, J. J.

AU - Mathew, A.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - Exchanging product data between feature-based geometric modelers presents some challenges. This is partly because features technology is still evolving, and also because there are major philosophical differences between the feature concepts on which different systems are based. The Form Feature Information Model (FFIM) that was developed by the pdes committee in the USA and accepted into the International Standards Organisation step standard was tested by means of experiments described in the paper. The modeler used in the experiments was the ASU Features Testbed, which was developed at the Arizona State University, USA, independently of the FFIM. The purpose of the experiments was to identify problems in the FFIM, and to suggest solutions where possible. In addition to the traditional problems of data transfer, such as numerical inaccuracies, a number of other factors that increase the complexity of the feature data-exchange process were identified. Some of these were the lack of relational positioning/locating information, multiple representations of a single feature, representation of certain popular profiles in rather tedious data structures, and the nonunique mapping of features between the two systems. The loss of semantic information, ecapsulated in rules, methods and constraints, seems to place some serious limits on information that can be exchanged with the current version of the FFIM. The pdes/step models are essentially static snapshots that are adequate for exchanging geometric and topological data, but are insufficient for dynamic exchange of feature models that encode engineering semantics in addition to geometric shapes.

AB - Exchanging product data between feature-based geometric modelers presents some challenges. This is partly because features technology is still evolving, and also because there are major philosophical differences between the feature concepts on which different systems are based. The Form Feature Information Model (FFIM) that was developed by the pdes committee in the USA and accepted into the International Standards Organisation step standard was tested by means of experiments described in the paper. The modeler used in the experiments was the ASU Features Testbed, which was developed at the Arizona State University, USA, independently of the FFIM. The purpose of the experiments was to identify problems in the FFIM, and to suggest solutions where possible. In addition to the traditional problems of data transfer, such as numerical inaccuracies, a number of other factors that increase the complexity of the feature data-exchange process were identified. Some of these were the lack of relational positioning/locating information, multiple representations of a single feature, representation of certain popular profiles in rather tedious data structures, and the nonunique mapping of features between the two systems. The loss of semantic information, ecapsulated in rules, methods and constraints, seems to place some serious limits on information that can be exchanged with the current version of the FFIM. The pdes/step models are essentially static snapshots that are adequate for exchanging geometric and topological data, but are insufficient for dynamic exchange of feature models that encode engineering semantics in addition to geometric shapes.

KW - features

KW - graphics standards

KW - pdes

KW - step

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026156057&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026156057&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0010-4485(91)90068-8

DO - 10.1016/0010-4485(91)90068-8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0026156057

VL - 23

SP - 282

EP - 296

JO - CAD Computer Aided Design

JF - CAD Computer Aided Design

SN - 0010-4485

IS - 4

ER -