Experimental Construct Validity in the Evaluation of Cognitive and Behavioral Treatments for Depression

Kathleen McNamara, John J. Horan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Distilled versions of Beck's cognitive and Lewinsohn's behavioral treatments for depression were crossed in a 2 × 2 design that included combined and high-demand control treatments as well. Multivariate and univariate analyses of pretreatment, midtreatment, posttreatment, and follow-up data revealed that the Cognitive Treatment factor produced a consistent and durable impact on a battery of devices reflecting cognitive manifestations of depression; some generalization to the behavioral domain occurred as well. The Behavioral Treatment factor failed to produce improvement within the corresponding behavioral assessment battery or on any cognitive device. Postmortem analysis of a full syndrome measure suggested possible evidence favoring each factor. Both conditions generated equivalent demand characteristics and counselor ratings of client adherence to treatment. No interactions involving the treatments occurred. The obtained pattern of convergent and divergent outcomes indicates considerable construct-valid strength for cognitive therapy applied to a moderately depressed population. Possible reasons for behavior therapy's comparatively weak showing are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-30
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Counseling Psychology
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1986

Fingerprint

Depression
Therapeutics
Equipment and Supplies
Neurobehavioral Manifestations
Behavior Therapy
Cognitive Therapy
Multivariate Analysis
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Experimental Construct Validity in the Evaluation of Cognitive and Behavioral Treatments for Depression. / McNamara, Kathleen; Horan, John J.

In: Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.1986, p. 23-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ef6909c9c18f4682ad7c7cb7b3b0b39e,
title = "Experimental Construct Validity in the Evaluation of Cognitive and Behavioral Treatments for Depression",
abstract = "Distilled versions of Beck's cognitive and Lewinsohn's behavioral treatments for depression were crossed in a 2 × 2 design that included combined and high-demand control treatments as well. Multivariate and univariate analyses of pretreatment, midtreatment, posttreatment, and follow-up data revealed that the Cognitive Treatment factor produced a consistent and durable impact on a battery of devices reflecting cognitive manifestations of depression; some generalization to the behavioral domain occurred as well. The Behavioral Treatment factor failed to produce improvement within the corresponding behavioral assessment battery or on any cognitive device. Postmortem analysis of a full syndrome measure suggested possible evidence favoring each factor. Both conditions generated equivalent demand characteristics and counselor ratings of client adherence to treatment. No interactions involving the treatments occurred. The obtained pattern of convergent and divergent outcomes indicates considerable construct-valid strength for cognitive therapy applied to a moderately depressed population. Possible reasons for behavior therapy's comparatively weak showing are discussed.",
author = "Kathleen McNamara and Horan, {John J.}",
year = "1986",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0022-0167.33.1.23",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "23--30",
journal = "Journal of Counseling Psychology",
issn = "0022-0167",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experimental Construct Validity in the Evaluation of Cognitive and Behavioral Treatments for Depression

AU - McNamara, Kathleen

AU - Horan, John J.

PY - 1986/1

Y1 - 1986/1

N2 - Distilled versions of Beck's cognitive and Lewinsohn's behavioral treatments for depression were crossed in a 2 × 2 design that included combined and high-demand control treatments as well. Multivariate and univariate analyses of pretreatment, midtreatment, posttreatment, and follow-up data revealed that the Cognitive Treatment factor produced a consistent and durable impact on a battery of devices reflecting cognitive manifestations of depression; some generalization to the behavioral domain occurred as well. The Behavioral Treatment factor failed to produce improvement within the corresponding behavioral assessment battery or on any cognitive device. Postmortem analysis of a full syndrome measure suggested possible evidence favoring each factor. Both conditions generated equivalent demand characteristics and counselor ratings of client adherence to treatment. No interactions involving the treatments occurred. The obtained pattern of convergent and divergent outcomes indicates considerable construct-valid strength for cognitive therapy applied to a moderately depressed population. Possible reasons for behavior therapy's comparatively weak showing are discussed.

AB - Distilled versions of Beck's cognitive and Lewinsohn's behavioral treatments for depression were crossed in a 2 × 2 design that included combined and high-demand control treatments as well. Multivariate and univariate analyses of pretreatment, midtreatment, posttreatment, and follow-up data revealed that the Cognitive Treatment factor produced a consistent and durable impact on a battery of devices reflecting cognitive manifestations of depression; some generalization to the behavioral domain occurred as well. The Behavioral Treatment factor failed to produce improvement within the corresponding behavioral assessment battery or on any cognitive device. Postmortem analysis of a full syndrome measure suggested possible evidence favoring each factor. Both conditions generated equivalent demand characteristics and counselor ratings of client adherence to treatment. No interactions involving the treatments occurred. The obtained pattern of convergent and divergent outcomes indicates considerable construct-valid strength for cognitive therapy applied to a moderately depressed population. Possible reasons for behavior therapy's comparatively weak showing are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001812780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001812780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-0167.33.1.23

DO - 10.1037/0022-0167.33.1.23

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0001812780

VL - 33

SP - 23

EP - 30

JO - Journal of Counseling Psychology

JF - Journal of Counseling Psychology

SN - 0022-0167

IS - 1

ER -