Experimental comparison of conventional and optical current transformers

Sadik Kucuksari, George G. Karady

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several manufacturers offer optical current transformers (OCTs) to replace the conventional magnetic current transformers (CTs). This paper compares the performances of some commercially available optical and conventional CTs. The steady state and transient responses of the two systems are compared in a laboratory. Field records are also obtained and evaluated to verify that the optical systems can replace conventional instrument transformers. In addition, OCT step response as well as the impact of ambient temperature on the OCT performance has been investigated. Results show that optical CTs are more than suitable for replacing conventional CTs. Further, the results also show that OCT has better frequency response than conventional CT. Differences found in the field and laboratory measurements are within experimental errors. Unlike the conventional CT, the OCT can have a digital output according to the IEC 61850 standard. The digital output of the OCT is tested for its frequency-amplitude characteristic. Results confirm that digital output has a narrower bandwidth than the low energy analog output of the OCT due to the limited sampling rate prescribed in a UCA guide to IEC-61850-9-2.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number5556040
Pages (from-to)2455-2463
Number of pages9
JournalIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2010

Fingerprint

Electric instrument transformers
Step response
Transient analysis
Optical systems
Frequency response

Keywords

  • Current transformers (CTs)
  • optical transducers
  • power system protection
  • transient response

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Cite this

Experimental comparison of conventional and optical current transformers. / Kucuksari, Sadik; Karady, George G.

In: IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 25, No. 4, 5556040, 10.2010, p. 2455-2463.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kucuksari, Sadik ; Karady, George G. / Experimental comparison of conventional and optical current transformers. In: IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. 2010 ; Vol. 25, No. 4. pp. 2455-2463.
@article{8450f6e67ee84233995c3153a1ac0d18,
title = "Experimental comparison of conventional and optical current transformers",
abstract = "Several manufacturers offer optical current transformers (OCTs) to replace the conventional magnetic current transformers (CTs). This paper compares the performances of some commercially available optical and conventional CTs. The steady state and transient responses of the two systems are compared in a laboratory. Field records are also obtained and evaluated to verify that the optical systems can replace conventional instrument transformers. In addition, OCT step response as well as the impact of ambient temperature on the OCT performance has been investigated. Results show that optical CTs are more than suitable for replacing conventional CTs. Further, the results also show that OCT has better frequency response than conventional CT. Differences found in the field and laboratory measurements are within experimental errors. Unlike the conventional CT, the OCT can have a digital output according to the IEC 61850 standard. The digital output of the OCT is tested for its frequency-amplitude characteristic. Results confirm that digital output has a narrower bandwidth than the low energy analog output of the OCT due to the limited sampling rate prescribed in a UCA guide to IEC-61850-9-2.",
keywords = "Current transformers (CTs), optical transducers, power system protection, transient response",
author = "Sadik Kucuksari and Karady, {George G.}",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1109/TPWRD.2010.2050010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "2455--2463",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery",
issn = "0885-8977",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experimental comparison of conventional and optical current transformers

AU - Kucuksari, Sadik

AU - Karady, George G.

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - Several manufacturers offer optical current transformers (OCTs) to replace the conventional magnetic current transformers (CTs). This paper compares the performances of some commercially available optical and conventional CTs. The steady state and transient responses of the two systems are compared in a laboratory. Field records are also obtained and evaluated to verify that the optical systems can replace conventional instrument transformers. In addition, OCT step response as well as the impact of ambient temperature on the OCT performance has been investigated. Results show that optical CTs are more than suitable for replacing conventional CTs. Further, the results also show that OCT has better frequency response than conventional CT. Differences found in the field and laboratory measurements are within experimental errors. Unlike the conventional CT, the OCT can have a digital output according to the IEC 61850 standard. The digital output of the OCT is tested for its frequency-amplitude characteristic. Results confirm that digital output has a narrower bandwidth than the low energy analog output of the OCT due to the limited sampling rate prescribed in a UCA guide to IEC-61850-9-2.

AB - Several manufacturers offer optical current transformers (OCTs) to replace the conventional magnetic current transformers (CTs). This paper compares the performances of some commercially available optical and conventional CTs. The steady state and transient responses of the two systems are compared in a laboratory. Field records are also obtained and evaluated to verify that the optical systems can replace conventional instrument transformers. In addition, OCT step response as well as the impact of ambient temperature on the OCT performance has been investigated. Results show that optical CTs are more than suitable for replacing conventional CTs. Further, the results also show that OCT has better frequency response than conventional CT. Differences found in the field and laboratory measurements are within experimental errors. Unlike the conventional CT, the OCT can have a digital output according to the IEC 61850 standard. The digital output of the OCT is tested for its frequency-amplitude characteristic. Results confirm that digital output has a narrower bandwidth than the low energy analog output of the OCT due to the limited sampling rate prescribed in a UCA guide to IEC-61850-9-2.

KW - Current transformers (CTs)

KW - optical transducers

KW - power system protection

KW - transient response

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956985102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956985102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TPWRD.2010.2050010

DO - 10.1109/TPWRD.2010.2050010

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77956985102

VL - 25

SP - 2455

EP - 2463

JO - IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery

JF - IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery

SN - 0885-8977

IS - 4

M1 - 5556040

ER -