Exoplanet Biosignatures: At the Dawn of a New Era of Planetary Observations

Nancy Y. Kiang, Shawn Domagal-Goldman, Mary N. Parenteau, David C. Catling, Yuka Fujii, Victoria S. Meadows, Edward W. Schwieterman, Sara Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The rapid rate of discoveries of exoplanets has expanded the scope of the science possible for the remote detection of life beyond Earth. The Exoplanet Biosignatures Workshop Without Walls (EBWWW) held in 2016 engaged the international scientific community across diverse scientific disciplines, to assess the state of the science and technology in the search for life on exoplanets, and to identify paths for progress. The workshop activities resulted in five major review papers, which provide (1) an encyclopedic review of known and proposed biosignatures and models used to ascertain them (Schwieterman et al., 2018 in this issue); (2) an in-depth review of O2 as a biosignature, rigorously examining the nuances of false positives and false negatives for evidence of life (Meadows et al., 2018 in this issue); (3) a Bayesian framework to comprehensively organize current understanding to quantify confidence in biosignature assessments (Catling et al., 2018 in this issue); (4) an extension of that Bayesian framework in anticipation of increasing planetary data and novel concepts of biosignatures (Walker et al., 2018 in this issue); and (5) a review of the upcoming telescope capabilities to characterize exoplanets and their environment (Fujii et al., 2018 in this issue). Because of the immense content of these review papers, this summary provides a guide to their complementary scope and highlights salient features. Strong themes that emerged from the workshop were that biosignatures must be interpreted in the context of their environment, and that frameworks must be developed to link diverse forms of scientific understanding of that context to quantify the likelihood that a biosignature has been observed. Models are needed to explore the parameter space where measurements will be widespread but sparse in detail. Given the technological prospects for large ground-based telescopes and space-based observatories, the detection of atmospheric signatures of a few potentially habitable planets may come before 2030.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)619-629
Number of pages11
JournalAstrobiology
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

extrasolar planets
Telescopes
Education
science and technology
Planets
planet
observatory
telescopes
Technology
planets
confidence
observatories
signatures
detection
parameter
rate
science

Keywords

  • Bayesian analysis
  • Biosignatures
  • Exoplanets
  • Remote observation
  • Spectral imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Kiang, N. Y., Domagal-Goldman, S., Parenteau, M. N., Catling, D. C., Fujii, Y., Meadows, V. S., ... Walker, S. (2018). Exoplanet Biosignatures: At the Dawn of a New Era of Planetary Observations. Astrobiology, 18(6), 619-629. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2018.1862

Exoplanet Biosignatures : At the Dawn of a New Era of Planetary Observations. / Kiang, Nancy Y.; Domagal-Goldman, Shawn; Parenteau, Mary N.; Catling, David C.; Fujii, Yuka; Meadows, Victoria S.; Schwieterman, Edward W.; Walker, Sara.

In: Astrobiology, Vol. 18, No. 6, 01.06.2018, p. 619-629.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Kiang, NY, Domagal-Goldman, S, Parenteau, MN, Catling, DC, Fujii, Y, Meadows, VS, Schwieterman, EW & Walker, S 2018, 'Exoplanet Biosignatures: At the Dawn of a New Era of Planetary Observations', Astrobiology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 619-629. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2018.1862
Kiang NY, Domagal-Goldman S, Parenteau MN, Catling DC, Fujii Y, Meadows VS et al. Exoplanet Biosignatures: At the Dawn of a New Era of Planetary Observations. Astrobiology. 2018 Jun 1;18(6):619-629. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2018.1862
Kiang, Nancy Y. ; Domagal-Goldman, Shawn ; Parenteau, Mary N. ; Catling, David C. ; Fujii, Yuka ; Meadows, Victoria S. ; Schwieterman, Edward W. ; Walker, Sara. / Exoplanet Biosignatures : At the Dawn of a New Era of Planetary Observations. In: Astrobiology. 2018 ; Vol. 18, No. 6. pp. 619-629.
@article{5c2eccfe6cb24797897d2c52579a5997,
title = "Exoplanet Biosignatures: At the Dawn of a New Era of Planetary Observations",
abstract = "The rapid rate of discoveries of exoplanets has expanded the scope of the science possible for the remote detection of life beyond Earth. The Exoplanet Biosignatures Workshop Without Walls (EBWWW) held in 2016 engaged the international scientific community across diverse scientific disciplines, to assess the state of the science and technology in the search for life on exoplanets, and to identify paths for progress. The workshop activities resulted in five major review papers, which provide (1) an encyclopedic review of known and proposed biosignatures and models used to ascertain them (Schwieterman et al., 2018 in this issue); (2) an in-depth review of O2 as a biosignature, rigorously examining the nuances of false positives and false negatives for evidence of life (Meadows et al., 2018 in this issue); (3) a Bayesian framework to comprehensively organize current understanding to quantify confidence in biosignature assessments (Catling et al., 2018 in this issue); (4) an extension of that Bayesian framework in anticipation of increasing planetary data and novel concepts of biosignatures (Walker et al., 2018 in this issue); and (5) a review of the upcoming telescope capabilities to characterize exoplanets and their environment (Fujii et al., 2018 in this issue). Because of the immense content of these review papers, this summary provides a guide to their complementary scope and highlights salient features. Strong themes that emerged from the workshop were that biosignatures must be interpreted in the context of their environment, and that frameworks must be developed to link diverse forms of scientific understanding of that context to quantify the likelihood that a biosignature has been observed. Models are needed to explore the parameter space where measurements will be widespread but sparse in detail. Given the technological prospects for large ground-based telescopes and space-based observatories, the detection of atmospheric signatures of a few potentially habitable planets may come before 2030.",
keywords = "Bayesian analysis, Biosignatures, Exoplanets, Remote observation, Spectral imaging",
author = "Kiang, {Nancy Y.} and Shawn Domagal-Goldman and Parenteau, {Mary N.} and Catling, {David C.} and Yuka Fujii and Meadows, {Victoria S.} and Schwieterman, {Edward W.} and Sara Walker",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/ast.2018.1862",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "619--629",
journal = "Astrobiology",
issn = "1531-1074",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exoplanet Biosignatures

T2 - At the Dawn of a New Era of Planetary Observations

AU - Kiang, Nancy Y.

AU - Domagal-Goldman, Shawn

AU - Parenteau, Mary N.

AU - Catling, David C.

AU - Fujii, Yuka

AU - Meadows, Victoria S.

AU - Schwieterman, Edward W.

AU - Walker, Sara

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - The rapid rate of discoveries of exoplanets has expanded the scope of the science possible for the remote detection of life beyond Earth. The Exoplanet Biosignatures Workshop Without Walls (EBWWW) held in 2016 engaged the international scientific community across diverse scientific disciplines, to assess the state of the science and technology in the search for life on exoplanets, and to identify paths for progress. The workshop activities resulted in five major review papers, which provide (1) an encyclopedic review of known and proposed biosignatures and models used to ascertain them (Schwieterman et al., 2018 in this issue); (2) an in-depth review of O2 as a biosignature, rigorously examining the nuances of false positives and false negatives for evidence of life (Meadows et al., 2018 in this issue); (3) a Bayesian framework to comprehensively organize current understanding to quantify confidence in biosignature assessments (Catling et al., 2018 in this issue); (4) an extension of that Bayesian framework in anticipation of increasing planetary data and novel concepts of biosignatures (Walker et al., 2018 in this issue); and (5) a review of the upcoming telescope capabilities to characterize exoplanets and their environment (Fujii et al., 2018 in this issue). Because of the immense content of these review papers, this summary provides a guide to their complementary scope and highlights salient features. Strong themes that emerged from the workshop were that biosignatures must be interpreted in the context of their environment, and that frameworks must be developed to link diverse forms of scientific understanding of that context to quantify the likelihood that a biosignature has been observed. Models are needed to explore the parameter space where measurements will be widespread but sparse in detail. Given the technological prospects for large ground-based telescopes and space-based observatories, the detection of atmospheric signatures of a few potentially habitable planets may come before 2030.

AB - The rapid rate of discoveries of exoplanets has expanded the scope of the science possible for the remote detection of life beyond Earth. The Exoplanet Biosignatures Workshop Without Walls (EBWWW) held in 2016 engaged the international scientific community across diverse scientific disciplines, to assess the state of the science and technology in the search for life on exoplanets, and to identify paths for progress. The workshop activities resulted in five major review papers, which provide (1) an encyclopedic review of known and proposed biosignatures and models used to ascertain them (Schwieterman et al., 2018 in this issue); (2) an in-depth review of O2 as a biosignature, rigorously examining the nuances of false positives and false negatives for evidence of life (Meadows et al., 2018 in this issue); (3) a Bayesian framework to comprehensively organize current understanding to quantify confidence in biosignature assessments (Catling et al., 2018 in this issue); (4) an extension of that Bayesian framework in anticipation of increasing planetary data and novel concepts of biosignatures (Walker et al., 2018 in this issue); and (5) a review of the upcoming telescope capabilities to characterize exoplanets and their environment (Fujii et al., 2018 in this issue). Because of the immense content of these review papers, this summary provides a guide to their complementary scope and highlights salient features. Strong themes that emerged from the workshop were that biosignatures must be interpreted in the context of their environment, and that frameworks must be developed to link diverse forms of scientific understanding of that context to quantify the likelihood that a biosignature has been observed. Models are needed to explore the parameter space where measurements will be widespread but sparse in detail. Given the technological prospects for large ground-based telescopes and space-based observatories, the detection of atmospheric signatures of a few potentially habitable planets may come before 2030.

KW - Bayesian analysis

KW - Biosignatures

KW - Exoplanets

KW - Remote observation

KW - Spectral imaging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049068471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049068471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/ast.2018.1862

DO - 10.1089/ast.2018.1862

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29741918

AN - SCOPUS:85049068471

VL - 18

SP - 619

EP - 629

JO - Astrobiology

JF - Astrobiology

SN - 1531-1074

IS - 6

ER -