Existence and the communicatively competent self

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most readers of Habermas would not classify him as an existential thinker. The view of Habermas as a philosopher in German Idealist and Critical traditions from Kant to Hegel and Marx to the Frankfurt School prevails among Continental as much as among analytic philosophers. And the mainstream Anglo-American reception of his work and politics is shaped by the approaches of formal analysis rather than those of existential and social phenomenology or even current American pragmatism. One may argue that both these readings eclipse richer existential dimensions of a thinker who challenges the notorious methodological and political splits among analytic, Continental and pragmatist orientations. I argue that Habermas' critical relation to Heidegger's ahistorical history of Being and his misguided political career cannot explain a competing narrative of his own affirmative appropriation of existential-ethical dimensions of thought and activism. Second, if one sets in the foreground this competing narrative, there emerges a weak thesis, whether or not a plausible complementarity between the communications critical social theory and concrete existential categories can be established. Third, one may inquire further into a stronger thesis whether or not this link must be developed in order to render Habermas' own theory of a communicatively competent self sufficiently concrete and critical.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)93-120
Number of pages28
JournalPhilosophy and Social Criticism
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Frankfurt School
political career
narrative
pragmatism
phenomenology
communications
politics
history
Continental
Thinkers
Social Theory
Complementarity
Thought
Georg W.F. Hegel
Martin Heidegger
Anglo-American
Appropriation
Formal Analysis
Eclipse
Reception

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Critical Theory
  • Existential philosophy
  • Fanon
  • Habermas
  • Heidegger
  • Kierkegaard
  • Marcuse
  • Postcolonial and gender theory
  • Sartre

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Existence and the communicatively competent self. / Matustik, Martin.

In: Philosophy and Social Criticism, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1999, p. 93-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{09cff74f5401410abd03331ddd5d99c9,
title = "Existence and the communicatively competent self",
abstract = "Most readers of Habermas would not classify him as an existential thinker. The view of Habermas as a philosopher in German Idealist and Critical traditions from Kant to Hegel and Marx to the Frankfurt School prevails among Continental as much as among analytic philosophers. And the mainstream Anglo-American reception of his work and politics is shaped by the approaches of formal analysis rather than those of existential and social phenomenology or even current American pragmatism. One may argue that both these readings eclipse richer existential dimensions of a thinker who challenges the notorious methodological and political splits among analytic, Continental and pragmatist orientations. I argue that Habermas' critical relation to Heidegger's ahistorical history of Being and his misguided political career cannot explain a competing narrative of his own affirmative appropriation of existential-ethical dimensions of thought and activism. Second, if one sets in the foreground this competing narrative, there emerges a weak thesis, whether or not a plausible complementarity between the communications critical social theory and concrete existential categories can be established. Third, one may inquire further into a stronger thesis whether or not this link must be developed in order to render Habermas' own theory of a communicatively competent self sufficiently concrete and critical.",
keywords = "Communication, Critical Theory, Existential philosophy, Fanon, Habermas, Heidegger, Kierkegaard, Marcuse, Postcolonial and gender theory, Sartre",
author = "Martin Matustik",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1177/019145379902500305",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "93--120",
journal = "Philosophy and Social Criticism",
issn = "0191-4537",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Existence and the communicatively competent self

AU - Matustik, Martin

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Most readers of Habermas would not classify him as an existential thinker. The view of Habermas as a philosopher in German Idealist and Critical traditions from Kant to Hegel and Marx to the Frankfurt School prevails among Continental as much as among analytic philosophers. And the mainstream Anglo-American reception of his work and politics is shaped by the approaches of formal analysis rather than those of existential and social phenomenology or even current American pragmatism. One may argue that both these readings eclipse richer existential dimensions of a thinker who challenges the notorious methodological and political splits among analytic, Continental and pragmatist orientations. I argue that Habermas' critical relation to Heidegger's ahistorical history of Being and his misguided political career cannot explain a competing narrative of his own affirmative appropriation of existential-ethical dimensions of thought and activism. Second, if one sets in the foreground this competing narrative, there emerges a weak thesis, whether or not a plausible complementarity between the communications critical social theory and concrete existential categories can be established. Third, one may inquire further into a stronger thesis whether or not this link must be developed in order to render Habermas' own theory of a communicatively competent self sufficiently concrete and critical.

AB - Most readers of Habermas would not classify him as an existential thinker. The view of Habermas as a philosopher in German Idealist and Critical traditions from Kant to Hegel and Marx to the Frankfurt School prevails among Continental as much as among analytic philosophers. And the mainstream Anglo-American reception of his work and politics is shaped by the approaches of formal analysis rather than those of existential and social phenomenology or even current American pragmatism. One may argue that both these readings eclipse richer existential dimensions of a thinker who challenges the notorious methodological and political splits among analytic, Continental and pragmatist orientations. I argue that Habermas' critical relation to Heidegger's ahistorical history of Being and his misguided political career cannot explain a competing narrative of his own affirmative appropriation of existential-ethical dimensions of thought and activism. Second, if one sets in the foreground this competing narrative, there emerges a weak thesis, whether or not a plausible complementarity between the communications critical social theory and concrete existential categories can be established. Third, one may inquire further into a stronger thesis whether or not this link must be developed in order to render Habermas' own theory of a communicatively competent self sufficiently concrete and critical.

KW - Communication

KW - Critical Theory

KW - Existential philosophy

KW - Fanon

KW - Habermas

KW - Heidegger

KW - Kierkegaard

KW - Marcuse

KW - Postcolonial and gender theory

KW - Sartre

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248092955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248092955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/019145379902500305

DO - 10.1177/019145379902500305

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 93

EP - 120

JO - Philosophy and Social Criticism

JF - Philosophy and Social Criticism

SN - 0191-4537

IS - 3

ER -