Examining the Use of Talk and Writing for Students' Development of Scientific Conceptual Knowledge Through Constructing and Critiquing Arguments

Ying-Chih Chen, Soonhye Park, Brian Hand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This study developed an analytic framework consisting of four patterns of talk and writing that can support students' engagement in construction and critique: Talk only, writing only, use of talk and writing in sequence, and use of talk and writing simultaneously. This study aimed to examine how each pattern supports students' development of scientific knowledge through the construction and critique of arguments and what cognitive functions are associated with each pattern. To trace students' knowledge development over time using the four patterns, three students were selected as target subjects. Data were analyzed using two approaches: (1) in-depth analysis of a Knowledge Development Trajectory and (2) constant comparative method. This study highlights elementary students' capability of engaging in argumentation that promotes their scientific knowledge development when provided with proper opportunities, facilitation, and time to recognize that talk and writing can be used as epistemic tools for both constructing and critiquing arguments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-147
Number of pages48
JournalCognition and Instruction
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2 2016

Fingerprint

Students
student
knowledge
argumentation
Cognition
time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Education

Cite this

Examining the Use of Talk and Writing for Students' Development of Scientific Conceptual Knowledge Through Constructing and Critiquing Arguments. / Chen, Ying-Chih; Park, Soonhye; Hand, Brian.

In: Cognition and Instruction , Vol. 34, No. 2, 02.04.2016, p. 100-147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7e70cbe8a23a4a73baf6c7640ec3dd40,
title = "Examining the Use of Talk and Writing for Students' Development of Scientific Conceptual Knowledge Through Constructing and Critiquing Arguments",
abstract = "ABSTRACT: This study developed an analytic framework consisting of four patterns of talk and writing that can support students' engagement in construction and critique: Talk only, writing only, use of talk and writing in sequence, and use of talk and writing simultaneously. This study aimed to examine how each pattern supports students' development of scientific knowledge through the construction and critique of arguments and what cognitive functions are associated with each pattern. To trace students' knowledge development over time using the four patterns, three students were selected as target subjects. Data were analyzed using two approaches: (1) in-depth analysis of a Knowledge Development Trajectory and (2) constant comparative method. This study highlights elementary students' capability of engaging in argumentation that promotes their scientific knowledge development when provided with proper opportunities, facilitation, and time to recognize that talk and writing can be used as epistemic tools for both constructing and critiquing arguments.",
author = "Ying-Chih Chen and Soonhye Park and Brian Hand",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/07370008.2016.1145120",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "100--147",
journal = "Cognition and Instruction",
issn = "0737-0008",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining the Use of Talk and Writing for Students' Development of Scientific Conceptual Knowledge Through Constructing and Critiquing Arguments

AU - Chen, Ying-Chih

AU - Park, Soonhye

AU - Hand, Brian

PY - 2016/4/2

Y1 - 2016/4/2

N2 - ABSTRACT: This study developed an analytic framework consisting of four patterns of talk and writing that can support students' engagement in construction and critique: Talk only, writing only, use of talk and writing in sequence, and use of talk and writing simultaneously. This study aimed to examine how each pattern supports students' development of scientific knowledge through the construction and critique of arguments and what cognitive functions are associated with each pattern. To trace students' knowledge development over time using the four patterns, three students were selected as target subjects. Data were analyzed using two approaches: (1) in-depth analysis of a Knowledge Development Trajectory and (2) constant comparative method. This study highlights elementary students' capability of engaging in argumentation that promotes their scientific knowledge development when provided with proper opportunities, facilitation, and time to recognize that talk and writing can be used as epistemic tools for both constructing and critiquing arguments.

AB - ABSTRACT: This study developed an analytic framework consisting of four patterns of talk and writing that can support students' engagement in construction and critique: Talk only, writing only, use of talk and writing in sequence, and use of talk and writing simultaneously. This study aimed to examine how each pattern supports students' development of scientific knowledge through the construction and critique of arguments and what cognitive functions are associated with each pattern. To trace students' knowledge development over time using the four patterns, three students were selected as target subjects. Data were analyzed using two approaches: (1) in-depth analysis of a Knowledge Development Trajectory and (2) constant comparative method. This study highlights elementary students' capability of engaging in argumentation that promotes their scientific knowledge development when provided with proper opportunities, facilitation, and time to recognize that talk and writing can be used as epistemic tools for both constructing and critiquing arguments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961252414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961252414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07370008.2016.1145120

DO - 10.1080/07370008.2016.1145120

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84961252414

VL - 34

SP - 100

EP - 147

JO - Cognition and Instruction

JF - Cognition and Instruction

SN - 0737-0008

IS - 2

ER -