Examining the Robustness of the Graded Response and 2-Parameter Logistic Models to Violations of Construct Normality

Patrick D. Manapat, Michael C. Edwards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

When fitting unidimensional item response theory (IRT) models, the population distribution of the latent trait (θ) is often assumed to be normally distributed. However, some psychological theories would suggest a nonnormal θ. For example, some clinical traits (e.g., alcoholism, depression) are believed to follow a positively skewed distribution where the construct is low for most people, medium for some, and high for few. Failure to account for nonnormality may compromise the validity of inferences and conclusions. Although corrections have been developed to account for nonnormality, these methods can be computationally intensive and have not yet been widely adopted. Previous research has recommended implementing nonnormality corrections when θ is not “approximately normal.” This research focused on examining how far θ can deviate from normal before the normality assumption becomes untenable. Specifically, our goal was to identify the type(s) and degree(s) of nonnormality that result in unacceptable parameter recovery for the graded response model (GRM) and 2-parameter logistic model (2PLM).

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEducational and Psychological Measurement
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2022

Keywords

  • 2PLM
  • GRM
  • item response theory
  • nonnormality
  • parameter recovery
  • simulation study

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Applied Mathematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Examining the Robustness of the Graded Response and 2-Parameter Logistic Models to Violations of Construct Normality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this