Examining the Differential Effects of a Universal SEL Curriculum on Student Functioning Through the Dual Continua Model of Mental Health

Andrew J. Thayer, Daniel M. Campa, Mollie R. Weeks, Joanne Buntain-Ricklefs, Sabina Low, Madeline Larson, Clayton R. Cook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Social-emotional learning (SEL) curricula, such as Second Step, are increasingly being adopted and implemented as universal supports in schools in order to prevent social-emotional and behavioral problems and promote wellbeing and success. Notwithstanding the empirical support for SEL as a universal prevention strategy, a closer look at the literature indicates that students display differential responses to SEL based on their behavioral functioning at baseline; those students with the highest need benefit the most from SEL. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a widely-adopted SEL program produces significant effects for different theoretically-constructed groups of students who are representative of the full spectrum of students in a school. Using data from a large-scale randomized controlled trial evaluating Second Step, analyses examined the extent to which group membership according to the dual continua model of mental health differentially changed based on whether the student was in the intervention or control condition. Overall, results evidenced significant effects favoring the intervention condition across groups in line with our general hypotheses, although both conditions experienced transitions in membership. As expected, those in the intervention condition experienced greater transition between groups, which was indicative of either treatment or prevention effects. Implications, limitations, and future directions of the findings for SEL programming in schools are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)405-427
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Primary Prevention
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 15 2019

Fingerprint

Curriculum
Mental Health
Learning
Students
Social Problems
Randomized Controlled Trials

Keywords

  • Dual continua
  • Mental health
  • Population effects
  • SEL
  • Universal prevention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Examining the Differential Effects of a Universal SEL Curriculum on Student Functioning Through the Dual Continua Model of Mental Health. / Thayer, Andrew J.; Campa, Daniel M.; Weeks, Mollie R.; Buntain-Ricklefs, Joanne; Low, Sabina; Larson, Madeline; Cook, Clayton R.

In: Journal of Primary Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 4, 15.08.2019, p. 405-427.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Thayer, Andrew J. ; Campa, Daniel M. ; Weeks, Mollie R. ; Buntain-Ricklefs, Joanne ; Low, Sabina ; Larson, Madeline ; Cook, Clayton R. / Examining the Differential Effects of a Universal SEL Curriculum on Student Functioning Through the Dual Continua Model of Mental Health. In: Journal of Primary Prevention. 2019 ; Vol. 40, No. 4. pp. 405-427.
@article{eaed92c4a5374feb9f4dbef7716fb629,
title = "Examining the Differential Effects of a Universal SEL Curriculum on Student Functioning Through the Dual Continua Model of Mental Health",
abstract = "Social-emotional learning (SEL) curricula, such as Second Step, are increasingly being adopted and implemented as universal supports in schools in order to prevent social-emotional and behavioral problems and promote wellbeing and success. Notwithstanding the empirical support for SEL as a universal prevention strategy, a closer look at the literature indicates that students display differential responses to SEL based on their behavioral functioning at baseline; those students with the highest need benefit the most from SEL. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a widely-adopted SEL program produces significant effects for different theoretically-constructed groups of students who are representative of the full spectrum of students in a school. Using data from a large-scale randomized controlled trial evaluating Second Step, analyses examined the extent to which group membership according to the dual continua model of mental health differentially changed based on whether the student was in the intervention or control condition. Overall, results evidenced significant effects favoring the intervention condition across groups in line with our general hypotheses, although both conditions experienced transitions in membership. As expected, those in the intervention condition experienced greater transition between groups, which was indicative of either treatment or prevention effects. Implications, limitations, and future directions of the findings for SEL programming in schools are discussed.",
keywords = "Dual continua, Mental health, Population effects, SEL, Universal prevention",
author = "Thayer, {Andrew J.} and Campa, {Daniel M.} and Weeks, {Mollie R.} and Joanne Buntain-Ricklefs and Sabina Low and Madeline Larson and Cook, {Clayton R.}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s10935-019-00557-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "405--427",
journal = "Journal of Primary Prevention",
issn = "0278-095X",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic/Human Sciences Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining the Differential Effects of a Universal SEL Curriculum on Student Functioning Through the Dual Continua Model of Mental Health

AU - Thayer, Andrew J.

AU - Campa, Daniel M.

AU - Weeks, Mollie R.

AU - Buntain-Ricklefs, Joanne

AU - Low, Sabina

AU - Larson, Madeline

AU - Cook, Clayton R.

PY - 2019/8/15

Y1 - 2019/8/15

N2 - Social-emotional learning (SEL) curricula, such as Second Step, are increasingly being adopted and implemented as universal supports in schools in order to prevent social-emotional and behavioral problems and promote wellbeing and success. Notwithstanding the empirical support for SEL as a universal prevention strategy, a closer look at the literature indicates that students display differential responses to SEL based on their behavioral functioning at baseline; those students with the highest need benefit the most from SEL. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a widely-adopted SEL program produces significant effects for different theoretically-constructed groups of students who are representative of the full spectrum of students in a school. Using data from a large-scale randomized controlled trial evaluating Second Step, analyses examined the extent to which group membership according to the dual continua model of mental health differentially changed based on whether the student was in the intervention or control condition. Overall, results evidenced significant effects favoring the intervention condition across groups in line with our general hypotheses, although both conditions experienced transitions in membership. As expected, those in the intervention condition experienced greater transition between groups, which was indicative of either treatment or prevention effects. Implications, limitations, and future directions of the findings for SEL programming in schools are discussed.

AB - Social-emotional learning (SEL) curricula, such as Second Step, are increasingly being adopted and implemented as universal supports in schools in order to prevent social-emotional and behavioral problems and promote wellbeing and success. Notwithstanding the empirical support for SEL as a universal prevention strategy, a closer look at the literature indicates that students display differential responses to SEL based on their behavioral functioning at baseline; those students with the highest need benefit the most from SEL. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a widely-adopted SEL program produces significant effects for different theoretically-constructed groups of students who are representative of the full spectrum of students in a school. Using data from a large-scale randomized controlled trial evaluating Second Step, analyses examined the extent to which group membership according to the dual continua model of mental health differentially changed based on whether the student was in the intervention or control condition. Overall, results evidenced significant effects favoring the intervention condition across groups in line with our general hypotheses, although both conditions experienced transitions in membership. As expected, those in the intervention condition experienced greater transition between groups, which was indicative of either treatment or prevention effects. Implications, limitations, and future directions of the findings for SEL programming in schools are discussed.

KW - Dual continua

KW - Mental health

KW - Population effects

KW - SEL

KW - Universal prevention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069912490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069912490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10935-019-00557-0

DO - 10.1007/s10935-019-00557-0

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 405

EP - 427

JO - Journal of Primary Prevention

JF - Journal of Primary Prevention

SN - 0278-095X

IS - 4

ER -