Examining social trust in fuels management strategies

Greg Winter, Christine Vogt, Sarah McCaffrey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

86 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Surveys of homeowners in three different ecosystems with varying fuels management approaches reveal that homeowners' trust in natural resource agencies is significantly associated with perceived risks and benefits and with perceived agency competence. A weaker association between forest value orientation and agency trust is evident. Focus group interviews provide further contextual support that the characteristics of competence, care, and credibility associated with an agency are influential in shaping trust. The correlation between trust and acceptance of each fuels management strategy at each of the study sites suggests that trust-building and trust maintenance should be key goals of agency-citizen interactions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8-15
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Forestry
Volume102
Issue number6
StatePublished - Sep 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

homeowners
homeowner
risk perception
focus groups
natural resources
interviews
natural resource
ecosystems
ecosystem
citizen

Keywords

  • Fuel treatments
  • Fuels management
  • Public acceptance
  • Public opinion
  • Resource management
  • Social trust
  • Wildland fires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Examining social trust in fuels management strategies. / Winter, Greg; Vogt, Christine; McCaffrey, Sarah.

In: Journal of Forestry, Vol. 102, No. 6, 09.2004, p. 8-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Winter, G, Vogt, C & McCaffrey, S 2004, 'Examining social trust in fuels management strategies', Journal of Forestry, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 8-15.
Winter, Greg ; Vogt, Christine ; McCaffrey, Sarah. / Examining social trust in fuels management strategies. In: Journal of Forestry. 2004 ; Vol. 102, No. 6. pp. 8-15.
@article{ae3d220b01304124b4f6f1ddc9281ce8,
title = "Examining social trust in fuels management strategies",
abstract = "Surveys of homeowners in three different ecosystems with varying fuels management approaches reveal that homeowners' trust in natural resource agencies is significantly associated with perceived risks and benefits and with perceived agency competence. A weaker association between forest value orientation and agency trust is evident. Focus group interviews provide further contextual support that the characteristics of competence, care, and credibility associated with an agency are influential in shaping trust. The correlation between trust and acceptance of each fuels management strategy at each of the study sites suggests that trust-building and trust maintenance should be key goals of agency-citizen interactions.",
keywords = "Fuel treatments, Fuels management, Public acceptance, Public opinion, Resource management, Social trust, Wildland fires",
author = "Greg Winter and Christine Vogt and Sarah McCaffrey",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "8--15",
journal = "Journal of Forestry",
issn = "0022-1201",
publisher = "Society of American Foresters",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining social trust in fuels management strategies

AU - Winter, Greg

AU - Vogt, Christine

AU - McCaffrey, Sarah

PY - 2004/9

Y1 - 2004/9

N2 - Surveys of homeowners in three different ecosystems with varying fuels management approaches reveal that homeowners' trust in natural resource agencies is significantly associated with perceived risks and benefits and with perceived agency competence. A weaker association between forest value orientation and agency trust is evident. Focus group interviews provide further contextual support that the characteristics of competence, care, and credibility associated with an agency are influential in shaping trust. The correlation between trust and acceptance of each fuels management strategy at each of the study sites suggests that trust-building and trust maintenance should be key goals of agency-citizen interactions.

AB - Surveys of homeowners in three different ecosystems with varying fuels management approaches reveal that homeowners' trust in natural resource agencies is significantly associated with perceived risks and benefits and with perceived agency competence. A weaker association between forest value orientation and agency trust is evident. Focus group interviews provide further contextual support that the characteristics of competence, care, and credibility associated with an agency are influential in shaping trust. The correlation between trust and acceptance of each fuels management strategy at each of the study sites suggests that trust-building and trust maintenance should be key goals of agency-citizen interactions.

KW - Fuel treatments

KW - Fuels management

KW - Public acceptance

KW - Public opinion

KW - Resource management

KW - Social trust

KW - Wildland fires

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=5444252193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=5444252193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:5444252193

VL - 102

SP - 8

EP - 15

JO - Journal of Forestry

JF - Journal of Forestry

SN - 0022-1201

IS - 6

ER -