Examining Rules in Friends with Benefits Relationships

Lisa J. van Raalte, Lori A. Bednarchik, Mark A. Generous, Paul A. Mongeau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Establishing communicative and behavioral boundaries in romantic relationships provides partners with a greater sense of relational stability and certainty. For romantic relationships, these boundaries, such as sexual exclusivity, are relatively straightforward. For casual sex relationships, however, the relational rules are less stable and certain. This exploratory study examined rules in friends with benefits relationships (FWBRs) for 109 college students in the USA. Responses to open-ended questions were collected through an online questionnaire, and data were qualitatively analyzed through an inductive thematic analysis. The data were structured into communication rules, sexual rules, and relational definition rules. Results provide overlap and extension of previous work investigating rules in FWBRs. Notably, participants reported sexual exclusivity as an important rule. Additionally, potentially competing discourses in FWBR rules were best understood through the lens of relational dialectics. Findings reflect a tension in terms of relational work, as partners struggle with maintaining their sexual and friendship relationship while not falling into the “territory” of romantic relationships.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalArchives of Sexual Behavior
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Friends with benefits relationships
  • Relational dialectics
  • Relational rules
  • Relationship talk
  • Sexual communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Examining Rules in Friends with Benefits Relationships'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this