TY - JOUR
T1 - Examination of coastal vulnerability framings at multiple levels of governance using spatial MCDA approach
AU - Ishtiaque, Asif
AU - Eakin, Hallie
AU - Chhetri, Netra
AU - Myint, Soe
AU - Dewan, Ashraf
AU - Kamruzzaman, Mohammad
N1 - Funding Information:
This research is partially funded by the Matthew G. Bailey Fellowship from the Arizona State University . We cordially thank Sheikh Mofizul Islam (Director, National Institute of Local Government), Moktar Hossain (Additional Deputy Commissioner, Patuakhali District Administration), Dr. Md. Bashirul Alam (Deputy Commissioner, Barguna District Administration), Shameem Chowdhury (Dhaka), and Tasnuba Jerin (Graduate Student, University of Kentucky) during the field survey are gratefully acknowledged.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - The multidimensional impacts of climate change necessitate participation of large scale organizations in the management of vulnerability to climate change. Operating at multiple levels of governance, these organizations help manage the deleterious effects of changing climate for different sectors of human-environment systems. How they frame vulnerability, what influences their framings, why are their framings aligned or misaligned: while these are critical questions for managing vulnerability, they are often overlooked in the literature. By ‘framing’ we mean how actors understand and evaluate key factors of vulnerability. Through a case study in Bangladesh, we analyze how vulnerability is framed by the leading organizations across five sectors and three levels of governance. Drawing from key-informant interviews, we developed a spatial multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach and identified vulnerability hotspots. With few variations, our study reveals that the framings of vulnerability are mostly aligned across scale irrespective at which stakeholders are operating. Collectively, proximity to river/sea along with poverty, schooling, cropping intensity, soil salinity, and availability of multipurpose disaster shelters are identified as key determinants of vulnerability by all organizations. They prioritize infrastructural and agricultural development as basis for vulnerability management. We argue that similarity of the understanding of vulnerability across scale would facilitate adaptation decision-making process. However, less focus on socio-economic criteria can undermine the success of adaptation initiatives. While the findings of this study can assist the decision-makers of Bangladesh in coastal vulnerability management, the methodological approach should be useful to assess coastal vulnerability in other parts of the world as well.
AB - The multidimensional impacts of climate change necessitate participation of large scale organizations in the management of vulnerability to climate change. Operating at multiple levels of governance, these organizations help manage the deleterious effects of changing climate for different sectors of human-environment systems. How they frame vulnerability, what influences their framings, why are their framings aligned or misaligned: while these are critical questions for managing vulnerability, they are often overlooked in the literature. By ‘framing’ we mean how actors understand and evaluate key factors of vulnerability. Through a case study in Bangladesh, we analyze how vulnerability is framed by the leading organizations across five sectors and three levels of governance. Drawing from key-informant interviews, we developed a spatial multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach and identified vulnerability hotspots. With few variations, our study reveals that the framings of vulnerability are mostly aligned across scale irrespective at which stakeholders are operating. Collectively, proximity to river/sea along with poverty, schooling, cropping intensity, soil salinity, and availability of multipurpose disaster shelters are identified as key determinants of vulnerability by all organizations. They prioritize infrastructural and agricultural development as basis for vulnerability management. We argue that similarity of the understanding of vulnerability across scale would facilitate adaptation decision-making process. However, less focus on socio-economic criteria can undermine the success of adaptation initiatives. While the findings of this study can assist the decision-makers of Bangladesh in coastal vulnerability management, the methodological approach should be useful to assess coastal vulnerability in other parts of the world as well.
KW - Bangladesh
KW - Framings
KW - Hotspots
KW - Multilevel
KW - Organizations
KW - Vulnerability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060751963&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060751963&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.01.020
DO - 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.01.020
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85060751963
SN - 0964-5691
VL - 171
SP - 66
EP - 79
JO - Ocean and Coastal Management
JF - Ocean and Coastal Management
ER -