Examination of coastal vulnerability framings at multiple levels of governance using spatial MCDA approach

Asif Ishtiaque, Hallie Eakin, Netra Chhetri, Soe Myint, Ashraf Dewan, Mohammad Kamruzzaman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The multidimensional impacts of climate change necessitate participation of large scale organizations in the management of vulnerability to climate change. Operating at multiple levels of governance, these organizations help manage the deleterious effects of changing climate for different sectors of human-environment systems. How they frame vulnerability, what influences their framings, why are their framings aligned or misaligned: while these are critical questions for managing vulnerability, they are often overlooked in the literature. By ‘framing’ we mean how actors understand and evaluate key factors of vulnerability. Through a case study in Bangladesh, we analyze how vulnerability is framed by the leading organizations across five sectors and three levels of governance. Drawing from key-informant interviews, we developed a spatial multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach and identified vulnerability hotspots. With few variations, our study reveals that the framings of vulnerability are mostly aligned across scale irrespective at which stakeholders are operating. Collectively, proximity to river/sea along with poverty, schooling, cropping intensity, soil salinity, and availability of multipurpose disaster shelters are identified as key determinants of vulnerability by all organizations. They prioritize infrastructural and agricultural development as basis for vulnerability management. We argue that similarity of the understanding of vulnerability across scale would facilitate adaptation decision-making process. However, less focus on socio-economic criteria can undermine the success of adaptation initiatives. While the findings of this study can assist the decision-makers of Bangladesh in coastal vulnerability management, the methodological approach should be useful to assess coastal vulnerability in other parts of the world as well.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)66-79
Number of pages14
JournalOcean and Coastal Management
Volume171
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

multi-criteria decision making
decision analysis
governance
vulnerability
climate change
Bangladesh
disasters
soil salinity
poverty
stakeholders
socioeconomics
decision making
interviews
case studies
rivers
infrastructural development
agricultural development
shelter
cropping practice
disaster

Keywords

  • Bangladesh
  • Framings
  • Hotspots
  • Multilevel
  • Organizations
  • Vulnerability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oceanography
  • Aquatic Science
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Examination of coastal vulnerability framings at multiple levels of governance using spatial MCDA approach. / Ishtiaque, Asif; Eakin, Hallie; Chhetri, Netra; Myint, Soe; Dewan, Ashraf; Kamruzzaman, Mohammad.

In: Ocean and Coastal Management, Vol. 171, 01.04.2019, p. 66-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ea1c719a1f414e6687a214f21a5fbeaf,
title = "Examination of coastal vulnerability framings at multiple levels of governance using spatial MCDA approach",
abstract = "The multidimensional impacts of climate change necessitate participation of large scale organizations in the management of vulnerability to climate change. Operating at multiple levels of governance, these organizations help manage the deleterious effects of changing climate for different sectors of human-environment systems. How they frame vulnerability, what influences their framings, why are their framings aligned or misaligned: while these are critical questions for managing vulnerability, they are often overlooked in the literature. By ‘framing’ we mean how actors understand and evaluate key factors of vulnerability. Through a case study in Bangladesh, we analyze how vulnerability is framed by the leading organizations across five sectors and three levels of governance. Drawing from key-informant interviews, we developed a spatial multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach and identified vulnerability hotspots. With few variations, our study reveals that the framings of vulnerability are mostly aligned across scale irrespective at which stakeholders are operating. Collectively, proximity to river/sea along with poverty, schooling, cropping intensity, soil salinity, and availability of multipurpose disaster shelters are identified as key determinants of vulnerability by all organizations. They prioritize infrastructural and agricultural development as basis for vulnerability management. We argue that similarity of the understanding of vulnerability across scale would facilitate adaptation decision-making process. However, less focus on socio-economic criteria can undermine the success of adaptation initiatives. While the findings of this study can assist the decision-makers of Bangladesh in coastal vulnerability management, the methodological approach should be useful to assess coastal vulnerability in other parts of the world as well.",
keywords = "Bangladesh, Framings, Hotspots, Multilevel, Organizations, Vulnerability",
author = "Asif Ishtiaque and Hallie Eakin and Netra Chhetri and Soe Myint and Ashraf Dewan and Mohammad Kamruzzaman",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.01.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "171",
pages = "66--79",
journal = "Ocean and Coastal Management",
issn = "0964-5691",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examination of coastal vulnerability framings at multiple levels of governance using spatial MCDA approach

AU - Ishtiaque, Asif

AU - Eakin, Hallie

AU - Chhetri, Netra

AU - Myint, Soe

AU - Dewan, Ashraf

AU - Kamruzzaman, Mohammad

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - The multidimensional impacts of climate change necessitate participation of large scale organizations in the management of vulnerability to climate change. Operating at multiple levels of governance, these organizations help manage the deleterious effects of changing climate for different sectors of human-environment systems. How they frame vulnerability, what influences their framings, why are their framings aligned or misaligned: while these are critical questions for managing vulnerability, they are often overlooked in the literature. By ‘framing’ we mean how actors understand and evaluate key factors of vulnerability. Through a case study in Bangladesh, we analyze how vulnerability is framed by the leading organizations across five sectors and three levels of governance. Drawing from key-informant interviews, we developed a spatial multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach and identified vulnerability hotspots. With few variations, our study reveals that the framings of vulnerability are mostly aligned across scale irrespective at which stakeholders are operating. Collectively, proximity to river/sea along with poverty, schooling, cropping intensity, soil salinity, and availability of multipurpose disaster shelters are identified as key determinants of vulnerability by all organizations. They prioritize infrastructural and agricultural development as basis for vulnerability management. We argue that similarity of the understanding of vulnerability across scale would facilitate adaptation decision-making process. However, less focus on socio-economic criteria can undermine the success of adaptation initiatives. While the findings of this study can assist the decision-makers of Bangladesh in coastal vulnerability management, the methodological approach should be useful to assess coastal vulnerability in other parts of the world as well.

AB - The multidimensional impacts of climate change necessitate participation of large scale organizations in the management of vulnerability to climate change. Operating at multiple levels of governance, these organizations help manage the deleterious effects of changing climate for different sectors of human-environment systems. How they frame vulnerability, what influences their framings, why are their framings aligned or misaligned: while these are critical questions for managing vulnerability, they are often overlooked in the literature. By ‘framing’ we mean how actors understand and evaluate key factors of vulnerability. Through a case study in Bangladesh, we analyze how vulnerability is framed by the leading organizations across five sectors and three levels of governance. Drawing from key-informant interviews, we developed a spatial multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach and identified vulnerability hotspots. With few variations, our study reveals that the framings of vulnerability are mostly aligned across scale irrespective at which stakeholders are operating. Collectively, proximity to river/sea along with poverty, schooling, cropping intensity, soil salinity, and availability of multipurpose disaster shelters are identified as key determinants of vulnerability by all organizations. They prioritize infrastructural and agricultural development as basis for vulnerability management. We argue that similarity of the understanding of vulnerability across scale would facilitate adaptation decision-making process. However, less focus on socio-economic criteria can undermine the success of adaptation initiatives. While the findings of this study can assist the decision-makers of Bangladesh in coastal vulnerability management, the methodological approach should be useful to assess coastal vulnerability in other parts of the world as well.

KW - Bangladesh

KW - Framings

KW - Hotspots

KW - Multilevel

KW - Organizations

KW - Vulnerability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060751963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060751963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.01.020

DO - 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.01.020

M3 - Article

VL - 171

SP - 66

EP - 79

JO - Ocean and Coastal Management

JF - Ocean and Coastal Management

SN - 0964-5691

ER -