Evolutionary theory in archaeological explanation

C Michael Barton, G. A. Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In spite of the the fact that archaeology embodies the study of change, it is only within the last few years that neo-Darwinian theory has begun to have an impact on archaeological explanation. This lack of acceptance of neo-Darwinian theory in archaeology is in part the result of a long history of archaeologists misunderstanding the processes and expectations of evolutionary theory. This volume attempts to illustrate the applicability of neo-Darwinian theory in archaeology by compiling studies that use this theoretical basis to resolve archaeological problems at varying degrees of temporal depth, at varying scales of social complexity, and employing varying metholodologies. Although a broad range of topics are covered in this volume, a number of issues remain to be addressed, including: links between evolutionary units and archaeological explanation; processes involved with the origin of behavioral variability; processes involved with the transmission of behavior; evaluating behavioral fitness; and the role of ʼnon-Darwinian’ processes in behavioral change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-15
Number of pages13
JournalArcheological Papers of the American Anthropological Association
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

Fingerprint

evolutionary theory
archaeology
fitness
acceptance
Evolutionary Theory
Archaeology
lack
history

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Archaeology
  • Archaeology

Cite this

Evolutionary theory in archaeological explanation. / Barton, C Michael; Clark, G. A.

In: Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, Vol. 7, No. 1, 01.01.1997, p. 3-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c4b8a9e83a7f4fdc857f7941b824aa12,
title = "Evolutionary theory in archaeological explanation",
abstract = "In spite of the the fact that archaeology embodies the study of change, it is only within the last few years that neo-Darwinian theory has begun to have an impact on archaeological explanation. This lack of acceptance of neo-Darwinian theory in archaeology is in part the result of a long history of archaeologists misunderstanding the processes and expectations of evolutionary theory. This volume attempts to illustrate the applicability of neo-Darwinian theory in archaeology by compiling studies that use this theoretical basis to resolve archaeological problems at varying degrees of temporal depth, at varying scales of social complexity, and employing varying metholodologies. Although a broad range of topics are covered in this volume, a number of issues remain to be addressed, including: links between evolutionary units and archaeological explanation; processes involved with the origin of behavioral variability; processes involved with the transmission of behavior; evaluating behavioral fitness; and the role of ʼnon-Darwinian’ processes in behavioral change.",
author = "Barton, {C Michael} and Clark, {G. A.}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1525/ap3a.1997.7.1.3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "3--15",
journal = "Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association",
issn = "1551-823X",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evolutionary theory in archaeological explanation

AU - Barton, C Michael

AU - Clark, G. A.

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - In spite of the the fact that archaeology embodies the study of change, it is only within the last few years that neo-Darwinian theory has begun to have an impact on archaeological explanation. This lack of acceptance of neo-Darwinian theory in archaeology is in part the result of a long history of archaeologists misunderstanding the processes and expectations of evolutionary theory. This volume attempts to illustrate the applicability of neo-Darwinian theory in archaeology by compiling studies that use this theoretical basis to resolve archaeological problems at varying degrees of temporal depth, at varying scales of social complexity, and employing varying metholodologies. Although a broad range of topics are covered in this volume, a number of issues remain to be addressed, including: links between evolutionary units and archaeological explanation; processes involved with the origin of behavioral variability; processes involved with the transmission of behavior; evaluating behavioral fitness; and the role of ʼnon-Darwinian’ processes in behavioral change.

AB - In spite of the the fact that archaeology embodies the study of change, it is only within the last few years that neo-Darwinian theory has begun to have an impact on archaeological explanation. This lack of acceptance of neo-Darwinian theory in archaeology is in part the result of a long history of archaeologists misunderstanding the processes and expectations of evolutionary theory. This volume attempts to illustrate the applicability of neo-Darwinian theory in archaeology by compiling studies that use this theoretical basis to resolve archaeological problems at varying degrees of temporal depth, at varying scales of social complexity, and employing varying metholodologies. Although a broad range of topics are covered in this volume, a number of issues remain to be addressed, including: links between evolutionary units and archaeological explanation; processes involved with the origin of behavioral variability; processes involved with the transmission of behavior; evaluating behavioral fitness; and the role of ʼnon-Darwinian’ processes in behavioral change.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002739361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002739361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1525/ap3a.1997.7.1.3

DO - 10.1525/ap3a.1997.7.1.3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0002739361

VL - 7

SP - 3

EP - 15

JO - Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association

JF - Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association

SN - 1551-823X

IS - 1

ER -