Evolutionary psychology and consumer behavior: A constructive critique

Joel B. Cohen, Harvey Bernard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examine the theoretical basis for the evolutionary narrative common to the target papers by Saad (this issue) and by Griskevicius and Kenrick (this issue) and identify areas of controversy that have sparked debate about evolutionary psychology [EP] among biologists and behavioral ecologists. The two main areas of disagreement are over (1) the role of genetic adaptations resulting from natural selection in ancient times compared to other forces leading to current behavior; and (2) the likelihood that evolution resulted in a set of highly specialized mental modules or information-processing circuits thought to be instrumental in determining present-day behavior. We review the EP research discussed by the authors of the target papers as a means of evaluating the evidence in support of the theory and of suggesting future directions of research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)387-399
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Consumer Psychology
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychology
Genetic Selection
Automatic Data Processing
Research
Consumer Behavior
Consumer behaviour
Evolutionary psychology
Direction compound
Information processing
Future directions
Natural selection
Evolutionary
Module

Keywords

  • Behavioral ecology
  • Biology and culture
  • Evolutionary psychology
  • Inheritance
  • Modularity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Marketing

Cite this

Evolutionary psychology and consumer behavior : A constructive critique. / Cohen, Joel B.; Bernard, Harvey.

In: Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 23, No. 3, 01.07.2013, p. 387-399.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5cfdfcacbc6b4b7d80fe084770ae589d,
title = "Evolutionary psychology and consumer behavior: A constructive critique",
abstract = "We examine the theoretical basis for the evolutionary narrative common to the target papers by Saad (this issue) and by Griskevicius and Kenrick (this issue) and identify areas of controversy that have sparked debate about evolutionary psychology [EP] among biologists and behavioral ecologists. The two main areas of disagreement are over (1) the role of genetic adaptations resulting from natural selection in ancient times compared to other forces leading to current behavior; and (2) the likelihood that evolution resulted in a set of highly specialized mental modules or information-processing circuits thought to be instrumental in determining present-day behavior. We review the EP research discussed by the authors of the target papers as a means of evaluating the evidence in support of the theory and of suggesting future directions of research.",
keywords = "Behavioral ecology, Biology and culture, Evolutionary psychology, Inheritance, Modularity",
author = "Cohen, {Joel B.} and Harvey Bernard",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcps.2013.03.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "387--399",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Psychology",
issn = "1057-7408",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evolutionary psychology and consumer behavior

T2 - A constructive critique

AU - Cohen, Joel B.

AU - Bernard, Harvey

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - We examine the theoretical basis for the evolutionary narrative common to the target papers by Saad (this issue) and by Griskevicius and Kenrick (this issue) and identify areas of controversy that have sparked debate about evolutionary psychology [EP] among biologists and behavioral ecologists. The two main areas of disagreement are over (1) the role of genetic adaptations resulting from natural selection in ancient times compared to other forces leading to current behavior; and (2) the likelihood that evolution resulted in a set of highly specialized mental modules or information-processing circuits thought to be instrumental in determining present-day behavior. We review the EP research discussed by the authors of the target papers as a means of evaluating the evidence in support of the theory and of suggesting future directions of research.

AB - We examine the theoretical basis for the evolutionary narrative common to the target papers by Saad (this issue) and by Griskevicius and Kenrick (this issue) and identify areas of controversy that have sparked debate about evolutionary psychology [EP] among biologists and behavioral ecologists. The two main areas of disagreement are over (1) the role of genetic adaptations resulting from natural selection in ancient times compared to other forces leading to current behavior; and (2) the likelihood that evolution resulted in a set of highly specialized mental modules or information-processing circuits thought to be instrumental in determining present-day behavior. We review the EP research discussed by the authors of the target papers as a means of evaluating the evidence in support of the theory and of suggesting future directions of research.

KW - Behavioral ecology

KW - Biology and culture

KW - Evolutionary psychology

KW - Inheritance

KW - Modularity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878909650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878909650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcps.2013.03.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jcps.2013.03.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84878909650

VL - 23

SP - 387

EP - 399

JO - Journal of Consumer Psychology

JF - Journal of Consumer Psychology

SN - 1057-7408

IS - 3

ER -