Evolutionary Developmental Biology Offers a Significant Challenge to the Neo-Darwinian Paradigm

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, I note that in evaluating present-day evo-devo the question for us is not only whether evo-devo is revolutionary in some sense, but also whether sometimes a "revolutionary" position in science can actually resemble more a "counter-revolution." I argue that the relationship between evo-devo and the neo-Darwinian paradigm can be interpreted exactly like that, and that the revolutionary nature of evo-devo lies precisely in its return to a more inclusive conception of phenotypic evolution, one that more closely resembles the conceptual framework of Darwin and the first few generations of evolutionists than the more narrowly focused interpretation of the Modern Synthesis. However, I also argue that evo-devo is by no means "reactionary" as it approaches these more traditional conceptual problems with all the methodological, technological, and empirical advances of the last six decades of biological research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationContemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology
PublisherWiley-Blackwell
Pages199-212
Number of pages14
ISBN (Print)9781405159982
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 11 2009

Fingerprint

Developmental Biology
Paradigm
Evolutionary
Evo-devo
Revolution
Modern Synthesis
Conception
Reactionary
Counter-revolution
Evolutionist
Conceptual Framework

Keywords

  • "revolutionary" position in science - resembling "counter-revolution"
  • Conceptual basis of evo-devo - diverse
  • Evo-devo - challenging Neo-Darwinian Paradigm
  • Evo-devo and different temporal scales
  • Evo-devo investigating range of specific questions
  • Evo-devo representing a paradigm shift
  • Evolutionary developmental biology - challenge to Neo-Darwinian paradigm
  • Rare episodes of paradigm shifts in science - conceptual in nature
  • Theory of phenotypic evolution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Evolutionary Developmental Biology Offers a Significant Challenge to the Neo-Darwinian Paradigm. / Laubichler, Manfred.

Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. p. 199-212.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Laubichler, Manfred. / Evolutionary Developmental Biology Offers a Significant Challenge to the Neo-Darwinian Paradigm. Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. pp. 199-212
@inbook{be5cad4804a34c938a3969be6a06b221,
title = "Evolutionary Developmental Biology Offers a Significant Challenge to the Neo-Darwinian Paradigm",
abstract = "In this paper, I note that in evaluating present-day evo-devo the question for us is not only whether evo-devo is revolutionary in some sense, but also whether sometimes a {"}revolutionary{"} position in science can actually resemble more a {"}counter-revolution.{"} I argue that the relationship between evo-devo and the neo-Darwinian paradigm can be interpreted exactly like that, and that the revolutionary nature of evo-devo lies precisely in its return to a more inclusive conception of phenotypic evolution, one that more closely resembles the conceptual framework of Darwin and the first few generations of evolutionists than the more narrowly focused interpretation of the Modern Synthesis. However, I also argue that evo-devo is by no means {"}reactionary{"} as it approaches these more traditional conceptual problems with all the methodological, technological, and empirical advances of the last six decades of biological research.",
keywords = "{"}revolutionary{"} position in science - resembling {"}counter-revolution{"}, Conceptual basis of evo-devo - diverse, Evo-devo - challenging Neo-Darwinian Paradigm, Evo-devo and different temporal scales, Evo-devo investigating range of specific questions, Evo-devo representing a paradigm shift, Evolutionary developmental biology - challenge to Neo-Darwinian paradigm, Rare episodes of paradigm shifts in science - conceptual in nature, Theory of phenotypic evolution",
author = "Manfred Laubichler",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1002/9781444314922.ch11",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781405159982",
pages = "199--212",
booktitle = "Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Evolutionary Developmental Biology Offers a Significant Challenge to the Neo-Darwinian Paradigm

AU - Laubichler, Manfred

PY - 2009/11/11

Y1 - 2009/11/11

N2 - In this paper, I note that in evaluating present-day evo-devo the question for us is not only whether evo-devo is revolutionary in some sense, but also whether sometimes a "revolutionary" position in science can actually resemble more a "counter-revolution." I argue that the relationship between evo-devo and the neo-Darwinian paradigm can be interpreted exactly like that, and that the revolutionary nature of evo-devo lies precisely in its return to a more inclusive conception of phenotypic evolution, one that more closely resembles the conceptual framework of Darwin and the first few generations of evolutionists than the more narrowly focused interpretation of the Modern Synthesis. However, I also argue that evo-devo is by no means "reactionary" as it approaches these more traditional conceptual problems with all the methodological, technological, and empirical advances of the last six decades of biological research.

AB - In this paper, I note that in evaluating present-day evo-devo the question for us is not only whether evo-devo is revolutionary in some sense, but also whether sometimes a "revolutionary" position in science can actually resemble more a "counter-revolution." I argue that the relationship between evo-devo and the neo-Darwinian paradigm can be interpreted exactly like that, and that the revolutionary nature of evo-devo lies precisely in its return to a more inclusive conception of phenotypic evolution, one that more closely resembles the conceptual framework of Darwin and the first few generations of evolutionists than the more narrowly focused interpretation of the Modern Synthesis. However, I also argue that evo-devo is by no means "reactionary" as it approaches these more traditional conceptual problems with all the methodological, technological, and empirical advances of the last six decades of biological research.

KW - "revolutionary" position in science - resembling "counter-revolution"

KW - Conceptual basis of evo-devo - diverse

KW - Evo-devo - challenging Neo-Darwinian Paradigm

KW - Evo-devo and different temporal scales

KW - Evo-devo investigating range of specific questions

KW - Evo-devo representing a paradigm shift

KW - Evolutionary developmental biology - challenge to Neo-Darwinian paradigm

KW - Rare episodes of paradigm shifts in science - conceptual in nature

KW - Theory of phenotypic evolution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889274233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889274233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/9781444314922.ch11

DO - 10.1002/9781444314922.ch11

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84889274233

SN - 9781405159982

SP - 199

EP - 212

BT - Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology

PB - Wiley-Blackwell

ER -