# Evidence for H2 Dissociation and Recombination Heat Transport in the Atmosphere of KELT-9b

Megan Mansfield, Jacob L. Bean, Kevin B. Stevenson, Thaddeus D. Komacek, Taylor J. Bell, Xianyu Tan, Matej Malik, Thomas G. Beatty, Ian Wong, Nicolas B. Cowan, Lisa Dang, Jean Michel Désert, Jonathan J. Fortney, B. Scott Gaudi, Dylan Keating, Eliza M.R. Kempton, Laura Kreidberg, Michael R. Line, Vivien Parmentier, Keivan G. StassunMark R. Swain, Robert T. Zellem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

## Abstract

Phase curve observations provide an opportunity to study the energy budgets of exoplanets by quantifying the amount of heat redistributed from their daysides to their nightsides. Theories of phase curves for hot Jupiters have focused on the balance between radiation and dynamics as the primary parameter controlling heat redistribution. However, recent phase curves have shown deviations from the trends that emerge from this theory, which has led to work on additional processes that may affect hot Jupiter energy budgets. One such process, molecular hydrogen dissociation and recombination, can enhance energy redistribution on ultra-hot Jupiters with temperatures above ∼2000 K. In order to study the impact of H2 dissociation on ultra-hot Jupiters, we present a phase curve of KELT-9b observed with the Spitzer Space Telescope at 4.5 μm. KELT-9b is the hottest known transiting planet, with a 4.5 μm dayside brightness temperature of ALT="${4566} {-136} {+140} {\rm{K}}$" SRC="apjlab5b09ieqn1.gif"/ and a nightside temperature of ALT="${2556} {-97} {+101} {\rm{K}}$" SRC="apjlab5b09ieqn2.gif"/ . We observe a phase curve amplitude of 0.609 ± 0.020 and an offset of ALT="${18.7} {-2.3} {+2.1}^\circ$" SRC="apjlab5b09ieqn3.gif"/ . The observed amplitude is too small to be explained by a simple balance between radiation and advection. General circulation models (GCMs) and an energy balance model that include the effects of H2 dissociation and recombination provide a better match to the data. The GCMs, however, predict a maximum phase offset of 5°, which disagrees with our observations at >5σ confidence. This discrepancy may be due to magnetic effects in the planet's highly ionized atmosphere.

Original language English (US) L15 Astrophysical Journal Letters 888 2 https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab5b09 Published - Jan 10 2020

## ASJC Scopus subject areas

• Astronomy and Astrophysics
• Space and Planetary Science