Evidence for a neural mechanism that encodes angles

D. Regan, Robert Gray, S. J. Hamstra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We measured the discrimination threshold (Δθ)Th for angle θ, where θ was either the angle of a Vee composed of two straight lines contained within the frontoparallel plane or the angle of intersection of two straight lines contained within the frontoparallel plane. The two-line pattern was rotated bodily through a random angle between trials with the aim of eliminating the absolute orientation of one or the other line as a reliable cue to the task. We report evidence that this aim was achieved. Our main conclusion is that the ability to discriminate a change in angle θ cannot entirely be explained in terms of the ability to discriminate changes in the orientations of the individual lines that comprise the Vee. We propose that the human visual pathway contains a neural mechanism that encodes the difference in the orientations of two simultaneously-presented straight lines. Discrimination threshold for angle (Δθ)Th is roughly twice orientation discrimination threshold for an isolated line. When subjects cannot use the orientation of one or another line as a cue to the task, the plot of (Δθ)Th vs θ is approximately flat between θ = 20 and 160 deg.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)323-330
Number of pages8
JournalVision Research
Volume36
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Cues
Visual Pathways
Discrimination (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Angle discrimination
  • Chevron
  • Hyperacuity
  • Orientation discrimination
  • Spatial vision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Regan, D., Gray, R., & Hamstra, S. J. (1996). Evidence for a neural mechanism that encodes angles. Vision Research, 36(2), 323-330.

Evidence for a neural mechanism that encodes angles. / Regan, D.; Gray, Robert; Hamstra, S. J.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 36, No. 2, 1996, p. 323-330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Regan, D, Gray, R & Hamstra, SJ 1996, 'Evidence for a neural mechanism that encodes angles', Vision Research, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 323-330.
Regan, D. ; Gray, Robert ; Hamstra, S. J. / Evidence for a neural mechanism that encodes angles. In: Vision Research. 1996 ; Vol. 36, No. 2. pp. 323-330.
@article{35745ddc24f74a3a9415263cd7482feb,
title = "Evidence for a neural mechanism that encodes angles",
abstract = "We measured the discrimination threshold (Δθ)Th for angle θ, where θ was either the angle of a Vee composed of two straight lines contained within the frontoparallel plane or the angle of intersection of two straight lines contained within the frontoparallel plane. The two-line pattern was rotated bodily through a random angle between trials with the aim of eliminating the absolute orientation of one or the other line as a reliable cue to the task. We report evidence that this aim was achieved. Our main conclusion is that the ability to discriminate a change in angle θ cannot entirely be explained in terms of the ability to discriminate changes in the orientations of the individual lines that comprise the Vee. We propose that the human visual pathway contains a neural mechanism that encodes the difference in the orientations of two simultaneously-presented straight lines. Discrimination threshold for angle (Δθ)Th is roughly twice orientation discrimination threshold for an isolated line. When subjects cannot use the orientation of one or another line as a cue to the task, the plot of (Δθ)Th vs θ is approximately flat between θ = 20 and 160 deg.",
keywords = "Angle discrimination, Chevron, Hyperacuity, Orientation discrimination, Spatial vision",
author = "D. Regan and Robert Gray and Hamstra, {S. J.}",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "323--330",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence for a neural mechanism that encodes angles

AU - Regan, D.

AU - Gray, Robert

AU - Hamstra, S. J.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - We measured the discrimination threshold (Δθ)Th for angle θ, where θ was either the angle of a Vee composed of two straight lines contained within the frontoparallel plane or the angle of intersection of two straight lines contained within the frontoparallel plane. The two-line pattern was rotated bodily through a random angle between trials with the aim of eliminating the absolute orientation of one or the other line as a reliable cue to the task. We report evidence that this aim was achieved. Our main conclusion is that the ability to discriminate a change in angle θ cannot entirely be explained in terms of the ability to discriminate changes in the orientations of the individual lines that comprise the Vee. We propose that the human visual pathway contains a neural mechanism that encodes the difference in the orientations of two simultaneously-presented straight lines. Discrimination threshold for angle (Δθ)Th is roughly twice orientation discrimination threshold for an isolated line. When subjects cannot use the orientation of one or another line as a cue to the task, the plot of (Δθ)Th vs θ is approximately flat between θ = 20 and 160 deg.

AB - We measured the discrimination threshold (Δθ)Th for angle θ, where θ was either the angle of a Vee composed of two straight lines contained within the frontoparallel plane or the angle of intersection of two straight lines contained within the frontoparallel plane. The two-line pattern was rotated bodily through a random angle between trials with the aim of eliminating the absolute orientation of one or the other line as a reliable cue to the task. We report evidence that this aim was achieved. Our main conclusion is that the ability to discriminate a change in angle θ cannot entirely be explained in terms of the ability to discriminate changes in the orientations of the individual lines that comprise the Vee. We propose that the human visual pathway contains a neural mechanism that encodes the difference in the orientations of two simultaneously-presented straight lines. Discrimination threshold for angle (Δθ)Th is roughly twice orientation discrimination threshold for an isolated line. When subjects cannot use the orientation of one or another line as a cue to the task, the plot of (Δθ)Th vs θ is approximately flat between θ = 20 and 160 deg.

KW - Angle discrimination

KW - Chevron

KW - Hyperacuity

KW - Orientation discrimination

KW - Spatial vision

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029655512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029655512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8594831

AN - SCOPUS:0029655512

VL - 36

SP - 323

EP - 330

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 2

ER -