Evidence for a generic interceptive strategy

Dennis M. Shaffer, Michael McBeath, Scott M. Krauchunas, Thomas Sugar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the present work, we first clarify a more precise definition of instantaneous optical angles in control tasks such as interception. We then test how well two interceptive strategies that have been proposed for catching fly balls account for human Frisbee-catching behavior. The first strategy is to maintain the ball's image along a linear optical trajectory (LOT). The second is to keep vertical optical ball velocity decreasing while maintaining constant lateral optical velocity. We found that an LOT accounted for an average of over 96% of the variance in optical Frisbee movement, while maintenance of vertical and lateral optical velocities was random. This work confirms a common interception strategy used across interceptive tasks, extending to complex target trajectories.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)145-157
Number of pages13
JournalPerception and Psychophysics
Volume70
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008

Fingerprint

Diptera
Maintenance
evidence
Optical
Trajectory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Evidence for a generic interceptive strategy. / Shaffer, Dennis M.; McBeath, Michael; Krauchunas, Scott M.; Sugar, Thomas.

In: Perception and Psychophysics, Vol. 70, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 145-157.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shaffer, Dennis M. ; McBeath, Michael ; Krauchunas, Scott M. ; Sugar, Thomas. / Evidence for a generic interceptive strategy. In: Perception and Psychophysics. 2008 ; Vol. 70, No. 1. pp. 145-157.
@article{d6e288e3002f4b2ea4b2db645d1c0d68,
title = "Evidence for a generic interceptive strategy",
abstract = "In the present work, we first clarify a more precise definition of instantaneous optical angles in control tasks such as interception. We then test how well two interceptive strategies that have been proposed for catching fly balls account for human Frisbee-catching behavior. The first strategy is to maintain the ball's image along a linear optical trajectory (LOT). The second is to keep vertical optical ball velocity decreasing while maintaining constant lateral optical velocity. We found that an LOT accounted for an average of over 96{\%} of the variance in optical Frisbee movement, while maintenance of vertical and lateral optical velocities was random. This work confirms a common interception strategy used across interceptive tasks, extending to complex target trajectories.",
author = "Shaffer, {Dennis M.} and Michael McBeath and Krauchunas, {Scott M.} and Thomas Sugar",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.3758/PP.70.1.145",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "145--157",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence for a generic interceptive strategy

AU - Shaffer, Dennis M.

AU - McBeath, Michael

AU - Krauchunas, Scott M.

AU - Sugar, Thomas

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - In the present work, we first clarify a more precise definition of instantaneous optical angles in control tasks such as interception. We then test how well two interceptive strategies that have been proposed for catching fly balls account for human Frisbee-catching behavior. The first strategy is to maintain the ball's image along a linear optical trajectory (LOT). The second is to keep vertical optical ball velocity decreasing while maintaining constant lateral optical velocity. We found that an LOT accounted for an average of over 96% of the variance in optical Frisbee movement, while maintenance of vertical and lateral optical velocities was random. This work confirms a common interception strategy used across interceptive tasks, extending to complex target trajectories.

AB - In the present work, we first clarify a more precise definition of instantaneous optical angles in control tasks such as interception. We then test how well two interceptive strategies that have been proposed for catching fly balls account for human Frisbee-catching behavior. The first strategy is to maintain the ball's image along a linear optical trajectory (LOT). The second is to keep vertical optical ball velocity decreasing while maintaining constant lateral optical velocity. We found that an LOT accounted for an average of over 96% of the variance in optical Frisbee movement, while maintenance of vertical and lateral optical velocities was random. This work confirms a common interception strategy used across interceptive tasks, extending to complex target trajectories.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40949119839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40949119839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/PP.70.1.145

DO - 10.3758/PP.70.1.145

M3 - Article

C2 - 18306968

AN - SCOPUS:40949119839

VL - 70

SP - 145

EP - 157

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 1

ER -