Evidence-Based Psychosocial Interventions for Ethnic Minority Youth: The 10-Year Update

Armando Pina, Antonio J. Polo, Stanley J. Huey

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This is the official update on the status of evidence-based psychosocial interventions for ethnic minority youth. Compared to a decade ago, there has been expansion of well-designed intervention studies, growth in the number (not type) of interventions meeting evidence-based criteria, and greater focus on testing ethnicity/race moderator effects. In terms of standard of evidence, 4 psychosocial interventions are now well-established and 10 are probably efficacious or possibly efficacious, with most protocols drawing on cognitive and behavioral change procedures and/or family systems models. Yet the research literature remains mostly focused on testing interventions with European Americans (White Caucasians), and little to no progress has been made in testing the effects of interventions with Asian American or Native American youth. Knowledge of the effects of cultural tailoring on program engagement, outcomes, and mechanisms of change remains scant.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)179-202
    Number of pages24
    JournalJournal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology
    Volume48
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Mar 4 2019

    Fingerprint

    Asian Americans
    North American Indians
    Growth
    Research

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Developmental and Educational Psychology
    • Clinical Psychology

    Cite this

    Evidence-Based Psychosocial Interventions for Ethnic Minority Youth : The 10-Year Update. / Pina, Armando; Polo, Antonio J.; Huey, Stanley J.

    In: Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Vol. 48, No. 2, 04.03.2019, p. 179-202.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{d5de646b9eb84ab0a7011b7c4940c3a5,
    title = "Evidence-Based Psychosocial Interventions for Ethnic Minority Youth: The 10-Year Update",
    abstract = "This is the official update on the status of evidence-based psychosocial interventions for ethnic minority youth. Compared to a decade ago, there has been expansion of well-designed intervention studies, growth in the number (not type) of interventions meeting evidence-based criteria, and greater focus on testing ethnicity/race moderator effects. In terms of standard of evidence, 4 psychosocial interventions are now well-established and 10 are probably efficacious or possibly efficacious, with most protocols drawing on cognitive and behavioral change procedures and/or family systems models. Yet the research literature remains mostly focused on testing interventions with European Americans (White Caucasians), and little to no progress has been made in testing the effects of interventions with Asian American or Native American youth. Knowledge of the effects of cultural tailoring on program engagement, outcomes, and mechanisms of change remains scant.",
    author = "Armando Pina and Polo, {Antonio J.} and Huey, {Stanley J.}",
    year = "2019",
    month = "3",
    day = "4",
    doi = "10.1080/15374416.2019.1567350",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "48",
    pages = "179--202",
    journal = "Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology",
    issn = "1537-4416",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Evidence-Based Psychosocial Interventions for Ethnic Minority Youth

    T2 - The 10-Year Update

    AU - Pina, Armando

    AU - Polo, Antonio J.

    AU - Huey, Stanley J.

    PY - 2019/3/4

    Y1 - 2019/3/4

    N2 - This is the official update on the status of evidence-based psychosocial interventions for ethnic minority youth. Compared to a decade ago, there has been expansion of well-designed intervention studies, growth in the number (not type) of interventions meeting evidence-based criteria, and greater focus on testing ethnicity/race moderator effects. In terms of standard of evidence, 4 psychosocial interventions are now well-established and 10 are probably efficacious or possibly efficacious, with most protocols drawing on cognitive and behavioral change procedures and/or family systems models. Yet the research literature remains mostly focused on testing interventions with European Americans (White Caucasians), and little to no progress has been made in testing the effects of interventions with Asian American or Native American youth. Knowledge of the effects of cultural tailoring on program engagement, outcomes, and mechanisms of change remains scant.

    AB - This is the official update on the status of evidence-based psychosocial interventions for ethnic minority youth. Compared to a decade ago, there has been expansion of well-designed intervention studies, growth in the number (not type) of interventions meeting evidence-based criteria, and greater focus on testing ethnicity/race moderator effects. In terms of standard of evidence, 4 psychosocial interventions are now well-established and 10 are probably efficacious or possibly efficacious, with most protocols drawing on cognitive and behavioral change procedures and/or family systems models. Yet the research literature remains mostly focused on testing interventions with European Americans (White Caucasians), and little to no progress has been made in testing the effects of interventions with Asian American or Native American youth. Knowledge of the effects of cultural tailoring on program engagement, outcomes, and mechanisms of change remains scant.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062600179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062600179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/15374416.2019.1567350

    DO - 10.1080/15374416.2019.1567350

    M3 - Article

    VL - 48

    SP - 179

    EP - 202

    JO - Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

    JF - Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

    SN - 1537-4416

    IS - 2

    ER -