Evaluation of the MyWellness Key accelerometer

S. D. Herrmann, T. L. Hart, Chong Lee, Barbara Ainsworth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine the concurrent validity of the Technogym MyWellness Key accelerometer against objective and subjective physical activity (PA) measures. Design: Randomised, cross-sectional design with two phases. The laboratory phase compared the MyWellness Key with the ActiGraph GT1M and the Yamax SW200 Digiwalker pedometer during graded treadmill walking, increasing speed each minute. The free-living phase compared the MyWellness Key with the ActiGraph, Digiwalker, Bouchard Activity cord (BAR) and Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) for seven continuous days. Data were analysed using Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients for all comparisons. Setting: Laboratory and free-living phases. Participants: Sixteen participants randomly stratified from 41 eligible respondents by sex (n=8 men; n=8 women) and PA levels (n=4 low, n=8 middle and n=4 high active). Results: There was a strong association between the MyWellness Key and the ActiGraph accelerometer during controlled graded treadmill walking (r=0.91, p<0.01) and in free-living settings (r=0.73-0.76 for light to vigorous PA, respectively, p<0.01). No associations were observed between the MyWellness Key and the BAR and GPAQ (p>0.05). Conclusions: The MyWellness Key has a high concurrent validity with the ActiGraph accelerometer to detect PA in both controlled laboratory and free-living settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-113
Number of pages5
JournalBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2011

Fingerprint

Exercise
Nonparametric Statistics
Walking
Surveys and Questionnaires
Walking Speed

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Evaluation of the MyWellness Key accelerometer. / Herrmann, S. D.; Hart, T. L.; Lee, Chong; Ainsworth, Barbara.

In: British Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 45, No. 2, 02.2011, p. 109-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Herrmann, S. D. ; Hart, T. L. ; Lee, Chong ; Ainsworth, Barbara. / Evaluation of the MyWellness Key accelerometer. In: British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 45, No. 2. pp. 109-113.
@article{8286e5525abc4c538edb1c0359731805,
title = "Evaluation of the MyWellness Key accelerometer",
abstract = "Objective: To examine the concurrent validity of the Technogym MyWellness Key accelerometer against objective and subjective physical activity (PA) measures. Design: Randomised, cross-sectional design with two phases. The laboratory phase compared the MyWellness Key with the ActiGraph GT1M and the Yamax SW200 Digiwalker pedometer during graded treadmill walking, increasing speed each minute. The free-living phase compared the MyWellness Key with the ActiGraph, Digiwalker, Bouchard Activity cord (BAR) and Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) for seven continuous days. Data were analysed using Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients for all comparisons. Setting: Laboratory and free-living phases. Participants: Sixteen participants randomly stratified from 41 eligible respondents by sex (n=8 men; n=8 women) and PA levels (n=4 low, n=8 middle and n=4 high active). Results: There was a strong association between the MyWellness Key and the ActiGraph accelerometer during controlled graded treadmill walking (r=0.91, p<0.01) and in free-living settings (r=0.73-0.76 for light to vigorous PA, respectively, p<0.01). No associations were observed between the MyWellness Key and the BAR and GPAQ (p>0.05). Conclusions: The MyWellness Key has a high concurrent validity with the ActiGraph accelerometer to detect PA in both controlled laboratory and free-living settings.",
author = "Herrmann, {S. D.} and Hart, {T. L.} and Chong Lee and Barbara Ainsworth",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1136/bjsm.2009.062182",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "109--113",
journal = "British Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0306-3674",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the MyWellness Key accelerometer

AU - Herrmann, S. D.

AU - Hart, T. L.

AU - Lee, Chong

AU - Ainsworth, Barbara

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - Objective: To examine the concurrent validity of the Technogym MyWellness Key accelerometer against objective and subjective physical activity (PA) measures. Design: Randomised, cross-sectional design with two phases. The laboratory phase compared the MyWellness Key with the ActiGraph GT1M and the Yamax SW200 Digiwalker pedometer during graded treadmill walking, increasing speed each minute. The free-living phase compared the MyWellness Key with the ActiGraph, Digiwalker, Bouchard Activity cord (BAR) and Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) for seven continuous days. Data were analysed using Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients for all comparisons. Setting: Laboratory and free-living phases. Participants: Sixteen participants randomly stratified from 41 eligible respondents by sex (n=8 men; n=8 women) and PA levels (n=4 low, n=8 middle and n=4 high active). Results: There was a strong association between the MyWellness Key and the ActiGraph accelerometer during controlled graded treadmill walking (r=0.91, p<0.01) and in free-living settings (r=0.73-0.76 for light to vigorous PA, respectively, p<0.01). No associations were observed between the MyWellness Key and the BAR and GPAQ (p>0.05). Conclusions: The MyWellness Key has a high concurrent validity with the ActiGraph accelerometer to detect PA in both controlled laboratory and free-living settings.

AB - Objective: To examine the concurrent validity of the Technogym MyWellness Key accelerometer against objective and subjective physical activity (PA) measures. Design: Randomised, cross-sectional design with two phases. The laboratory phase compared the MyWellness Key with the ActiGraph GT1M and the Yamax SW200 Digiwalker pedometer during graded treadmill walking, increasing speed each minute. The free-living phase compared the MyWellness Key with the ActiGraph, Digiwalker, Bouchard Activity cord (BAR) and Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) for seven continuous days. Data were analysed using Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients for all comparisons. Setting: Laboratory and free-living phases. Participants: Sixteen participants randomly stratified from 41 eligible respondents by sex (n=8 men; n=8 women) and PA levels (n=4 low, n=8 middle and n=4 high active). Results: There was a strong association between the MyWellness Key and the ActiGraph accelerometer during controlled graded treadmill walking (r=0.91, p<0.01) and in free-living settings (r=0.73-0.76 for light to vigorous PA, respectively, p<0.01). No associations were observed between the MyWellness Key and the BAR and GPAQ (p>0.05). Conclusions: The MyWellness Key has a high concurrent validity with the ActiGraph accelerometer to detect PA in both controlled laboratory and free-living settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79551501561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79551501561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjsm.2009.062182

DO - 10.1136/bjsm.2009.062182

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 109

EP - 113

JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0306-3674

IS - 2

ER -