Evaluation of energy-conversion efficiencies in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) utilizing fermentable and non-fermentable substrates

Hyung Sool Lee, Prathap Parameswaran, Andrew Marcus, Cesar Torres, Bruce Rittmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

256 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We established the first complete electron-equivalent balances in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) fed with non-fermentable (acetate) and fermentable (glucose) electron donors by experimentally quantifying current, biomass, residual organic compounds, H2, and CH4 gas. The comparison of the two donors allowed us to objectively evaluate the diversion of electron flow to non-electricity sinks for fermentable donors, leading to different behaviors in energy-conversion efficiency (ECE) and potential efficiency (PE). Electrical current was the most significant electron sink in both MFCs, being 71% and 49%, respectively, of the initial COD applied. Biomass and residual organic compounds, the second and third greatest sinks, respectively, were greater in the glucose-fed MFC than in the acetate-fed MFC. We detected methane gas only in the glucose-fed MFC, and this means that anode-respiring bacteria (ARB) could out-compete acetoclastic methanogens. The ECE was 42% with acetate, but was only 3% with glucose. The very low ECE for glucose was mostly due to a large increase of the anode potential, giving a PE of only 6%. Although the glucose-fed MFC had the higher biomass density on its anode, it had a very low current density, which supports the fact that the density of ARB was very low. This led to slow kinetics for electron transfer to the anode and accentuated loss due to the substrate-concentration gradient in the anode-biofilm. The large drop of PE with low current, probably caused by a low ARB density and electron (e-) donor concentration, resulted in a poor maximum power density (9.8 mW/m2) with glucose. In contrast, PE reached 59% along with high current for acetate and the maximum power density was 360 mW/m2.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1501-1510
Number of pages10
JournalWater Research
Volume42
Issue number6-7
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2008

Fingerprint

Microbial fuel cells
fuel cell
Energy conversion
Conversion efficiency
Glucose
Anodes
glucose
substrate
electron
Substrates
Electrons
acetate
Bacteria
Biomass
Organic compounds
bacterium
organic compound
biomass
Methanogens
Biofilms

Keywords

  • ARB density
  • Concentration gradient
  • Electron-equivalent balance
  • Energy-conversion efficiency
  • Potential efficiency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth-Surface Processes

Cite this

Evaluation of energy-conversion efficiencies in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) utilizing fermentable and non-fermentable substrates. / Lee, Hyung Sool; Parameswaran, Prathap; Marcus, Andrew; Torres, Cesar; Rittmann, Bruce.

In: Water Research, Vol. 42, No. 6-7, 03.2008, p. 1501-1510.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0e55bf8add9f4d9d8bc284850d6fbfa4,
title = "Evaluation of energy-conversion efficiencies in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) utilizing fermentable and non-fermentable substrates",
abstract = "We established the first complete electron-equivalent balances in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) fed with non-fermentable (acetate) and fermentable (glucose) electron donors by experimentally quantifying current, biomass, residual organic compounds, H2, and CH4 gas. The comparison of the two donors allowed us to objectively evaluate the diversion of electron flow to non-electricity sinks for fermentable donors, leading to different behaviors in energy-conversion efficiency (ECE) and potential efficiency (PE). Electrical current was the most significant electron sink in both MFCs, being 71{\%} and 49{\%}, respectively, of the initial COD applied. Biomass and residual organic compounds, the second and third greatest sinks, respectively, were greater in the glucose-fed MFC than in the acetate-fed MFC. We detected methane gas only in the glucose-fed MFC, and this means that anode-respiring bacteria (ARB) could out-compete acetoclastic methanogens. The ECE was 42{\%} with acetate, but was only 3{\%} with glucose. The very low ECE for glucose was mostly due to a large increase of the anode potential, giving a PE of only 6{\%}. Although the glucose-fed MFC had the higher biomass density on its anode, it had a very low current density, which supports the fact that the density of ARB was very low. This led to slow kinetics for electron transfer to the anode and accentuated loss due to the substrate-concentration gradient in the anode-biofilm. The large drop of PE with low current, probably caused by a low ARB density and electron (e-) donor concentration, resulted in a poor maximum power density (9.8 mW/m2) with glucose. In contrast, PE reached 59{\%} along with high current for acetate and the maximum power density was 360 mW/m2.",
keywords = "ARB density, Concentration gradient, Electron-equivalent balance, Energy-conversion efficiency, Potential efficiency",
author = "Lee, {Hyung Sool} and Prathap Parameswaran and Andrew Marcus and Cesar Torres and Bruce Rittmann",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.watres.2007.10.036",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "1501--1510",
journal = "Water Research",
issn = "0043-1354",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "6-7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of energy-conversion efficiencies in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) utilizing fermentable and non-fermentable substrates

AU - Lee, Hyung Sool

AU - Parameswaran, Prathap

AU - Marcus, Andrew

AU - Torres, Cesar

AU - Rittmann, Bruce

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - We established the first complete electron-equivalent balances in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) fed with non-fermentable (acetate) and fermentable (glucose) electron donors by experimentally quantifying current, biomass, residual organic compounds, H2, and CH4 gas. The comparison of the two donors allowed us to objectively evaluate the diversion of electron flow to non-electricity sinks for fermentable donors, leading to different behaviors in energy-conversion efficiency (ECE) and potential efficiency (PE). Electrical current was the most significant electron sink in both MFCs, being 71% and 49%, respectively, of the initial COD applied. Biomass and residual organic compounds, the second and third greatest sinks, respectively, were greater in the glucose-fed MFC than in the acetate-fed MFC. We detected methane gas only in the glucose-fed MFC, and this means that anode-respiring bacteria (ARB) could out-compete acetoclastic methanogens. The ECE was 42% with acetate, but was only 3% with glucose. The very low ECE for glucose was mostly due to a large increase of the anode potential, giving a PE of only 6%. Although the glucose-fed MFC had the higher biomass density on its anode, it had a very low current density, which supports the fact that the density of ARB was very low. This led to slow kinetics for electron transfer to the anode and accentuated loss due to the substrate-concentration gradient in the anode-biofilm. The large drop of PE with low current, probably caused by a low ARB density and electron (e-) donor concentration, resulted in a poor maximum power density (9.8 mW/m2) with glucose. In contrast, PE reached 59% along with high current for acetate and the maximum power density was 360 mW/m2.

AB - We established the first complete electron-equivalent balances in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) fed with non-fermentable (acetate) and fermentable (glucose) electron donors by experimentally quantifying current, biomass, residual organic compounds, H2, and CH4 gas. The comparison of the two donors allowed us to objectively evaluate the diversion of electron flow to non-electricity sinks for fermentable donors, leading to different behaviors in energy-conversion efficiency (ECE) and potential efficiency (PE). Electrical current was the most significant electron sink in both MFCs, being 71% and 49%, respectively, of the initial COD applied. Biomass and residual organic compounds, the second and third greatest sinks, respectively, were greater in the glucose-fed MFC than in the acetate-fed MFC. We detected methane gas only in the glucose-fed MFC, and this means that anode-respiring bacteria (ARB) could out-compete acetoclastic methanogens. The ECE was 42% with acetate, but was only 3% with glucose. The very low ECE for glucose was mostly due to a large increase of the anode potential, giving a PE of only 6%. Although the glucose-fed MFC had the higher biomass density on its anode, it had a very low current density, which supports the fact that the density of ARB was very low. This led to slow kinetics for electron transfer to the anode and accentuated loss due to the substrate-concentration gradient in the anode-biofilm. The large drop of PE with low current, probably caused by a low ARB density and electron (e-) donor concentration, resulted in a poor maximum power density (9.8 mW/m2) with glucose. In contrast, PE reached 59% along with high current for acetate and the maximum power density was 360 mW/m2.

KW - ARB density

KW - Concentration gradient

KW - Electron-equivalent balance

KW - Energy-conversion efficiency

KW - Potential efficiency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40749115223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40749115223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.watres.2007.10.036

DO - 10.1016/j.watres.2007.10.036

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 1501

EP - 1510

JO - Water Research

JF - Water Research

SN - 0043-1354

IS - 6-7

ER -