TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 historical simulations in the Colorado River basin
AU - Gautam, Jenita
AU - Mascaro, Giuseppe
N1 - Funding Information:
information National Science Foundation, Grant/Award Number: 1462086We thank Dr. Efthymios I. Nikolopoulos and an anonymous reviewer for their comments that helped us improve the quality of the manuscript. This work has been developed under the project “DMUU: DCDC III: Transformational Solutions for Urban Water Sustainability Transitions in the Colorado River Basin” funded by the National Science Foundation (Award No. 1462086).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Royal Meteorological Society
PY - 2018/8
Y1 - 2018/8
N2 - The Colorado River basin (CRB) is the primary source of water in the southwestern United States. A key step to reduce the uncertainty of future streamflow projections in the CRB is to evaluate the performance of historical simulations of general circulation models (GCMs). In this study, this challenge is addressed by evaluating the ability of 19 GCMs from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) and four nested regional climate models (RCMs) in reproducing the statistical properties of the hydrologic cycle and temperature in the CRB. To capture the transition from snow-dominated to semi-arid regions, analyses are conducted by spatially averaging the climate variables in four nested sub-basins. Most models overestimate the mean annual precipitation (P) and underestimate the mean annual temperature (T) at all locations (up to +140% and −4.9 °C, respectively). A group of models capture the mean annual run-off at all sub-basins with different strengths of the hydrological cycle, depending on the level of P overestimation. Another set of models overestimate the mean annual run-off, due to a weak cycle in the evaporation channel. An abrupt increase in the mean annual T of ~0.8 °C is detected at all locations around 1980 from the observed and most of the simulated time series. However, no statistically significant monotonic trends emerge for both P and T. All models simulate the seasonality of T quite well. The phasing of the seasonal cycle of P is reproduced fairly well in one of the upper, snow-dominated sub-basins. Model performances degrade in the larger sub-basins that include semi-arid areas, because several GCMs are not able to capture the effect of the North American monsoon. Finally, the relative performances of the climate models in reproducing the climatologies of P and T are quantified to support future impact studies in the basin.
AB - The Colorado River basin (CRB) is the primary source of water in the southwestern United States. A key step to reduce the uncertainty of future streamflow projections in the CRB is to evaluate the performance of historical simulations of general circulation models (GCMs). In this study, this challenge is addressed by evaluating the ability of 19 GCMs from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) and four nested regional climate models (RCMs) in reproducing the statistical properties of the hydrologic cycle and temperature in the CRB. To capture the transition from snow-dominated to semi-arid regions, analyses are conducted by spatially averaging the climate variables in four nested sub-basins. Most models overestimate the mean annual precipitation (P) and underestimate the mean annual temperature (T) at all locations (up to +140% and −4.9 °C, respectively). A group of models capture the mean annual run-off at all sub-basins with different strengths of the hydrological cycle, depending on the level of P overestimation. Another set of models overestimate the mean annual run-off, due to a weak cycle in the evaporation channel. An abrupt increase in the mean annual T of ~0.8 °C is detected at all locations around 1980 from the observed and most of the simulated time series. However, no statistically significant monotonic trends emerge for both P and T. All models simulate the seasonality of T quite well. The phasing of the seasonal cycle of P is reproduced fairly well in one of the upper, snow-dominated sub-basins. Model performances degrade in the larger sub-basins that include semi-arid areas, because several GCMs are not able to capture the effect of the North American monsoon. Finally, the relative performances of the climate models in reproducing the climatologies of P and T are quantified to support future impact studies in the basin.
KW - Colorado River basin
KW - changing points
KW - general circulation models
KW - historical climate simulations
KW - interannual variability
KW - seasonal variability
KW - trend
KW - water balance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045479693&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045479693&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/joc.5540
DO - 10.1002/joc.5540
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85045479693
SN - 0899-8418
VL - 38
SP - 3861
EP - 3877
JO - International Journal of Climatology
JF - International Journal of Climatology
IS - 10
ER -