Evaluation of a cell phone-based physical activity diary

Barbara Sternfeld, Sheng Fang Jiang, Teresa Picchi, Lisa Chasan-Taber, Barbara Ainsworth, Charles P. Quesenberry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Physical activity (PA) diaries reduce the recall error inherent in self-reported PA but are burdensome. The purpose of this study was to compare a cell phone-based diary with a paper diary and examine the reliability and validity of the cell phone diary. METHODS: In a pilot study, 25 women and 23 men, age 45-65 yr, completed cell phone and paper PA diaries 4 d•wk -1 for three consecutive weeks and a user satisfaction survey. In the subsequent validation study, 623 middle-age participants (52.5% women) were asked to complete the cell phone diary and wear an accelerometer for two 7-d periods, approximately 6 months apart. They also completed two PA questionnaires. Fitness, body mass index, and percent body fat were obtained as indirect validation criteria. RESULTS: Estimates of PA from the cell phone and paper diaries were similar (mean within person difference = -43.8 MET•min•d -1 of total PA, SD = 360, P = 0.49, 7.4 min•d -1 of moderate-vigorous PA, SD = 66, P = 0.53). Users preferred the cell phone diary over the paper diary (59.6% vs 35.4%). In the subsequent study, intraclass correlations for the cell phone diary ranged from 0.55 for light PA to 0.63 for vigorous PA. Although PA estimates from the cell phone diary were generally significantly higher than those from the accelerometer and the questionnaires, correlations for moderate and vigorous PA were moderate (ρ = 0.25-0.59 with the questionnaires and 0.27-0.35 with the accelerometer). The correlations between the cell phone diary and the indirect validation criteria were generally in the expected direction and of moderate magnitude. CONCLUSIONS: A cell phone-based PA diary is equivalent to a paper diary, acceptable to users, and a relatively reliable and valid approach to self-reported PA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)487-495
Number of pages9
JournalMedicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Cell Phones
Exercise
Validation Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Adipose Tissue
Body Mass Index

Keywords

  • ECOLOGICAL MOMENTARY ASSESSMENT
  • MOBILE TECHNOLOGY
  • RECALL ERROR
  • RELIABILITY
  • SELF-REPORTED PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
  • VALIDITY

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Sternfeld, B., Jiang, S. F., Picchi, T., Chasan-Taber, L., Ainsworth, B., & Quesenberry, C. P. (2012). Evaluation of a cell phone-based physical activity diary. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 44(3), 487-495. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182325f45

Evaluation of a cell phone-based physical activity diary. / Sternfeld, Barbara; Jiang, Sheng Fang; Picchi, Teresa; Chasan-Taber, Lisa; Ainsworth, Barbara; Quesenberry, Charles P.

In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Vol. 44, No. 3, 03.2012, p. 487-495.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sternfeld, B, Jiang, SF, Picchi, T, Chasan-Taber, L, Ainsworth, B & Quesenberry, CP 2012, 'Evaluation of a cell phone-based physical activity diary', Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 487-495. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182325f45
Sternfeld B, Jiang SF, Picchi T, Chasan-Taber L, Ainsworth B, Quesenberry CP. Evaluation of a cell phone-based physical activity diary. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2012 Mar;44(3):487-495. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182325f45
Sternfeld, Barbara ; Jiang, Sheng Fang ; Picchi, Teresa ; Chasan-Taber, Lisa ; Ainsworth, Barbara ; Quesenberry, Charles P. / Evaluation of a cell phone-based physical activity diary. In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2012 ; Vol. 44, No. 3. pp. 487-495.
@article{d91c8ad95335482794c8fd7909c1835e,
title = "Evaluation of a cell phone-based physical activity diary",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Physical activity (PA) diaries reduce the recall error inherent in self-reported PA but are burdensome. The purpose of this study was to compare a cell phone-based diary with a paper diary and examine the reliability and validity of the cell phone diary. METHODS: In a pilot study, 25 women and 23 men, age 45-65 yr, completed cell phone and paper PA diaries 4 d•wk -1 for three consecutive weeks and a user satisfaction survey. In the subsequent validation study, 623 middle-age participants (52.5{\%} women) were asked to complete the cell phone diary and wear an accelerometer for two 7-d periods, approximately 6 months apart. They also completed two PA questionnaires. Fitness, body mass index, and percent body fat were obtained as indirect validation criteria. RESULTS: Estimates of PA from the cell phone and paper diaries were similar (mean within person difference = -43.8 MET•min•d -1 of total PA, SD = 360, P = 0.49, 7.4 min•d -1 of moderate-vigorous PA, SD = 66, P = 0.53). Users preferred the cell phone diary over the paper diary (59.6{\%} vs 35.4{\%}). In the subsequent study, intraclass correlations for the cell phone diary ranged from 0.55 for light PA to 0.63 for vigorous PA. Although PA estimates from the cell phone diary were generally significantly higher than those from the accelerometer and the questionnaires, correlations for moderate and vigorous PA were moderate (ρ = 0.25-0.59 with the questionnaires and 0.27-0.35 with the accelerometer). The correlations between the cell phone diary and the indirect validation criteria were generally in the expected direction and of moderate magnitude. CONCLUSIONS: A cell phone-based PA diary is equivalent to a paper diary, acceptable to users, and a relatively reliable and valid approach to self-reported PA.",
keywords = "ECOLOGICAL MOMENTARY ASSESSMENT, MOBILE TECHNOLOGY, RECALL ERROR, RELIABILITY, SELF-REPORTED PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, VALIDITY",
author = "Barbara Sternfeld and Jiang, {Sheng Fang} and Teresa Picchi and Lisa Chasan-Taber and Barbara Ainsworth and Quesenberry, {Charles P.}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182325f45",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "487--495",
journal = "Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise",
issn = "0195-9131",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of a cell phone-based physical activity diary

AU - Sternfeld, Barbara

AU - Jiang, Sheng Fang

AU - Picchi, Teresa

AU - Chasan-Taber, Lisa

AU - Ainsworth, Barbara

AU - Quesenberry, Charles P.

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - PURPOSE: Physical activity (PA) diaries reduce the recall error inherent in self-reported PA but are burdensome. The purpose of this study was to compare a cell phone-based diary with a paper diary and examine the reliability and validity of the cell phone diary. METHODS: In a pilot study, 25 women and 23 men, age 45-65 yr, completed cell phone and paper PA diaries 4 d•wk -1 for three consecutive weeks and a user satisfaction survey. In the subsequent validation study, 623 middle-age participants (52.5% women) were asked to complete the cell phone diary and wear an accelerometer for two 7-d periods, approximately 6 months apart. They also completed two PA questionnaires. Fitness, body mass index, and percent body fat were obtained as indirect validation criteria. RESULTS: Estimates of PA from the cell phone and paper diaries were similar (mean within person difference = -43.8 MET•min•d -1 of total PA, SD = 360, P = 0.49, 7.4 min•d -1 of moderate-vigorous PA, SD = 66, P = 0.53). Users preferred the cell phone diary over the paper diary (59.6% vs 35.4%). In the subsequent study, intraclass correlations for the cell phone diary ranged from 0.55 for light PA to 0.63 for vigorous PA. Although PA estimates from the cell phone diary were generally significantly higher than those from the accelerometer and the questionnaires, correlations for moderate and vigorous PA were moderate (ρ = 0.25-0.59 with the questionnaires and 0.27-0.35 with the accelerometer). The correlations between the cell phone diary and the indirect validation criteria were generally in the expected direction and of moderate magnitude. CONCLUSIONS: A cell phone-based PA diary is equivalent to a paper diary, acceptable to users, and a relatively reliable and valid approach to self-reported PA.

AB - PURPOSE: Physical activity (PA) diaries reduce the recall error inherent in self-reported PA but are burdensome. The purpose of this study was to compare a cell phone-based diary with a paper diary and examine the reliability and validity of the cell phone diary. METHODS: In a pilot study, 25 women and 23 men, age 45-65 yr, completed cell phone and paper PA diaries 4 d•wk -1 for three consecutive weeks and a user satisfaction survey. In the subsequent validation study, 623 middle-age participants (52.5% women) were asked to complete the cell phone diary and wear an accelerometer for two 7-d periods, approximately 6 months apart. They also completed two PA questionnaires. Fitness, body mass index, and percent body fat were obtained as indirect validation criteria. RESULTS: Estimates of PA from the cell phone and paper diaries were similar (mean within person difference = -43.8 MET•min•d -1 of total PA, SD = 360, P = 0.49, 7.4 min•d -1 of moderate-vigorous PA, SD = 66, P = 0.53). Users preferred the cell phone diary over the paper diary (59.6% vs 35.4%). In the subsequent study, intraclass correlations for the cell phone diary ranged from 0.55 for light PA to 0.63 for vigorous PA. Although PA estimates from the cell phone diary were generally significantly higher than those from the accelerometer and the questionnaires, correlations for moderate and vigorous PA were moderate (ρ = 0.25-0.59 with the questionnaires and 0.27-0.35 with the accelerometer). The correlations between the cell phone diary and the indirect validation criteria were generally in the expected direction and of moderate magnitude. CONCLUSIONS: A cell phone-based PA diary is equivalent to a paper diary, acceptable to users, and a relatively reliable and valid approach to self-reported PA.

KW - ECOLOGICAL MOMENTARY ASSESSMENT

KW - MOBILE TECHNOLOGY

KW - RECALL ERROR

KW - RELIABILITY

KW - SELF-REPORTED PHYSICAL ACTIVITY

KW - VALIDITY

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857625456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857625456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182325f45

DO - 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182325f45

M3 - Article

C2 - 21857369

AN - SCOPUS:84857625456

VL - 44

SP - 487

EP - 495

JO - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

JF - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

SN - 0195-9131

IS - 3

ER -