Evaluating Track II approaches to security diplomacy in the Asia-Pacific: The CSCAP experience

Sheldon W. Simon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The national Councils for Security Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific (CSCAPs) are fine exemplars of Track II security diplomacy whose mission is to prepare studies on security matters for their governmental Track I counterparts in the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). The CSCAPs also provide a test of propositions drawn from the epistemic community literature in international relations which posits that non-governmental experts can influence government decision-making. This study of CSCAP activities and their impact on the ARF provides some support for epistemic community propositions. However, other findings suggest that epistemic community theory requires modification to take account of the blurred line between Tracks I and II in CSCAP. Nevertheless, the CSCAPs have achieved some noteworthy successes, including a definition of preventive diplomacy adopted by the ARF. On balance, then, Track II epistemic communities are playing a significant role in Track I security deliberations in the Asia-Pacific.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)167-200
Number of pages34
JournalPacific Review
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

diplomacy
ASEAN
experience
community
Asia
co-operation
international relations
National Council
deliberation
decision making
expert

Keywords

  • ARF
  • Cooperative security
  • CSCAP
  • Track II diplomacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Evaluating Track II approaches to security diplomacy in the Asia-Pacific : The CSCAP experience. / Simon, Sheldon W.

In: Pacific Review, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2002, p. 167-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{672e1bc44dc04bfa9de90be27b3c39e5,
title = "Evaluating Track II approaches to security diplomacy in the Asia-Pacific: The CSCAP experience",
abstract = "The national Councils for Security Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific (CSCAPs) are fine exemplars of Track II security diplomacy whose mission is to prepare studies on security matters for their governmental Track I counterparts in the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). The CSCAPs also provide a test of propositions drawn from the epistemic community literature in international relations which posits that non-governmental experts can influence government decision-making. This study of CSCAP activities and their impact on the ARF provides some support for epistemic community propositions. However, other findings suggest that epistemic community theory requires modification to take account of the blurred line between Tracks I and II in CSCAP. Nevertheless, the CSCAPs have achieved some noteworthy successes, including a definition of preventive diplomacy adopted by the ARF. On balance, then, Track II epistemic communities are playing a significant role in Track I security deliberations in the Asia-Pacific.",
keywords = "ARF, Cooperative security, CSCAP, Track II diplomacy",
author = "Simon, {Sheldon W.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1080/09512740210131031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "167--200",
journal = "Pacific Review",
issn = "0951-2748",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating Track II approaches to security diplomacy in the Asia-Pacific

T2 - The CSCAP experience

AU - Simon, Sheldon W.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - The national Councils for Security Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific (CSCAPs) are fine exemplars of Track II security diplomacy whose mission is to prepare studies on security matters for their governmental Track I counterparts in the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). The CSCAPs also provide a test of propositions drawn from the epistemic community literature in international relations which posits that non-governmental experts can influence government decision-making. This study of CSCAP activities and their impact on the ARF provides some support for epistemic community propositions. However, other findings suggest that epistemic community theory requires modification to take account of the blurred line between Tracks I and II in CSCAP. Nevertheless, the CSCAPs have achieved some noteworthy successes, including a definition of preventive diplomacy adopted by the ARF. On balance, then, Track II epistemic communities are playing a significant role in Track I security deliberations in the Asia-Pacific.

AB - The national Councils for Security Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific (CSCAPs) are fine exemplars of Track II security diplomacy whose mission is to prepare studies on security matters for their governmental Track I counterparts in the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). The CSCAPs also provide a test of propositions drawn from the epistemic community literature in international relations which posits that non-governmental experts can influence government decision-making. This study of CSCAP activities and their impact on the ARF provides some support for epistemic community propositions. However, other findings suggest that epistemic community theory requires modification to take account of the blurred line between Tracks I and II in CSCAP. Nevertheless, the CSCAPs have achieved some noteworthy successes, including a definition of preventive diplomacy adopted by the ARF. On balance, then, Track II epistemic communities are playing a significant role in Track I security deliberations in the Asia-Pacific.

KW - ARF

KW - Cooperative security

KW - CSCAP

KW - Track II diplomacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036297949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036297949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09512740210131031

DO - 10.1080/09512740210131031

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036297949

VL - 15

SP - 167

EP - 200

JO - Pacific Review

JF - Pacific Review

SN - 0951-2748

IS - 2

ER -