Evaluating the use of ram and suction during prey capture by cichlid fishes

Peter C. Wainwright, Lara Ferry, Thomas B. Waltzek, Andrew M. Carroll, C. Darrin Hulsey, Justin R. Grubich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

133 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We characterized prey-capture strategies in seven species of cichlid fishes representing diverse trophic habits and anticipated feeding abilities. The species examined were Petenia splendida, Cichla ocellaris, Cichlasoma minckleyi, Astronotus ocellatus, Crenicichla geayi, Heros severus (formerly Cichlasoma severum) and Cyprichromis leptosoma. Three individuals per species were filmed with video at 500 Hz as they captured live adult Artemia sp. and Poecilia reticulata. For each feeding sequence, we measured the contribution of predator movement towards the prey (i.e. ram) and the movement of prey towards the predator due to suction. The use of ram differed significantly among prey types and predator species, varying as much as sixfold across predator species. High values of ram resulted in high attack velocities. Jaw protrusion contributed as much as 50% to overall ram values in some species, verifying its role in enhancing attack velocity. Suction distance did not vary significantly among species. Diversity in prey-capture behavior was therefore found to reflect differences among species in the strategy used to approach prey. Limited variation in the distance from which prey were sucked into the mouth is interpreted as the result of an expected exponential decline in water velocity with distance from the mouth of the suction-feeding predator. We propose that this relationship represents a major constraint on the distance over which suction feeding is effective for all aquatic-feeding predators.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3039-3051
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Experimental Biology
Volume204
Issue number17
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cichlids
prey capture
cichlid
Suction
rams
suction
predators
predator
fish
Mouth
Poecilia
Artemia
Aptitude
mouth
Jaw
Habits
Poecilia reticulata
interspecific variation
jaws
Water

Keywords

  • Cichlid
  • Feeding
  • Feeding performance
  • Index
  • Prey capture
  • Ram-suction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Wainwright, P. C., Ferry, L., Waltzek, T. B., Carroll, A. M., Hulsey, C. D., & Grubich, J. R. (2001). Evaluating the use of ram and suction during prey capture by cichlid fishes. Journal of Experimental Biology, 204(17), 3039-3051.

Evaluating the use of ram and suction during prey capture by cichlid fishes. / Wainwright, Peter C.; Ferry, Lara; Waltzek, Thomas B.; Carroll, Andrew M.; Hulsey, C. Darrin; Grubich, Justin R.

In: Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol. 204, No. 17, 2001, p. 3039-3051.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wainwright, PC, Ferry, L, Waltzek, TB, Carroll, AM, Hulsey, CD & Grubich, JR 2001, 'Evaluating the use of ram and suction during prey capture by cichlid fishes', Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 204, no. 17, pp. 3039-3051.
Wainwright PC, Ferry L, Waltzek TB, Carroll AM, Hulsey CD, Grubich JR. Evaluating the use of ram and suction during prey capture by cichlid fishes. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2001;204(17):3039-3051.
Wainwright, Peter C. ; Ferry, Lara ; Waltzek, Thomas B. ; Carroll, Andrew M. ; Hulsey, C. Darrin ; Grubich, Justin R. / Evaluating the use of ram and suction during prey capture by cichlid fishes. In: Journal of Experimental Biology. 2001 ; Vol. 204, No. 17. pp. 3039-3051.
@article{c5b947302f8c45f9ba86f7b2366414b0,
title = "Evaluating the use of ram and suction during prey capture by cichlid fishes",
abstract = "We characterized prey-capture strategies in seven species of cichlid fishes representing diverse trophic habits and anticipated feeding abilities. The species examined were Petenia splendida, Cichla ocellaris, Cichlasoma minckleyi, Astronotus ocellatus, Crenicichla geayi, Heros severus (formerly Cichlasoma severum) and Cyprichromis leptosoma. Three individuals per species were filmed with video at 500 Hz as they captured live adult Artemia sp. and Poecilia reticulata. For each feeding sequence, we measured the contribution of predator movement towards the prey (i.e. ram) and the movement of prey towards the predator due to suction. The use of ram differed significantly among prey types and predator species, varying as much as sixfold across predator species. High values of ram resulted in high attack velocities. Jaw protrusion contributed as much as 50{\%} to overall ram values in some species, verifying its role in enhancing attack velocity. Suction distance did not vary significantly among species. Diversity in prey-capture behavior was therefore found to reflect differences among species in the strategy used to approach prey. Limited variation in the distance from which prey were sucked into the mouth is interpreted as the result of an expected exponential decline in water velocity with distance from the mouth of the suction-feeding predator. We propose that this relationship represents a major constraint on the distance over which suction feeding is effective for all aquatic-feeding predators.",
keywords = "Cichlid, Feeding, Feeding performance, Index, Prey capture, Ram-suction",
author = "Wainwright, {Peter C.} and Lara Ferry and Waltzek, {Thomas B.} and Carroll, {Andrew M.} and Hulsey, {C. Darrin} and Grubich, {Justin R.}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "204",
pages = "3039--3051",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Biology",
issn = "0022-0949",
publisher = "Company of Biologists Ltd",
number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the use of ram and suction during prey capture by cichlid fishes

AU - Wainwright, Peter C.

AU - Ferry, Lara

AU - Waltzek, Thomas B.

AU - Carroll, Andrew M.

AU - Hulsey, C. Darrin

AU - Grubich, Justin R.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - We characterized prey-capture strategies in seven species of cichlid fishes representing diverse trophic habits and anticipated feeding abilities. The species examined were Petenia splendida, Cichla ocellaris, Cichlasoma minckleyi, Astronotus ocellatus, Crenicichla geayi, Heros severus (formerly Cichlasoma severum) and Cyprichromis leptosoma. Three individuals per species were filmed with video at 500 Hz as they captured live adult Artemia sp. and Poecilia reticulata. For each feeding sequence, we measured the contribution of predator movement towards the prey (i.e. ram) and the movement of prey towards the predator due to suction. The use of ram differed significantly among prey types and predator species, varying as much as sixfold across predator species. High values of ram resulted in high attack velocities. Jaw protrusion contributed as much as 50% to overall ram values in some species, verifying its role in enhancing attack velocity. Suction distance did not vary significantly among species. Diversity in prey-capture behavior was therefore found to reflect differences among species in the strategy used to approach prey. Limited variation in the distance from which prey were sucked into the mouth is interpreted as the result of an expected exponential decline in water velocity with distance from the mouth of the suction-feeding predator. We propose that this relationship represents a major constraint on the distance over which suction feeding is effective for all aquatic-feeding predators.

AB - We characterized prey-capture strategies in seven species of cichlid fishes representing diverse trophic habits and anticipated feeding abilities. The species examined were Petenia splendida, Cichla ocellaris, Cichlasoma minckleyi, Astronotus ocellatus, Crenicichla geayi, Heros severus (formerly Cichlasoma severum) and Cyprichromis leptosoma. Three individuals per species were filmed with video at 500 Hz as they captured live adult Artemia sp. and Poecilia reticulata. For each feeding sequence, we measured the contribution of predator movement towards the prey (i.e. ram) and the movement of prey towards the predator due to suction. The use of ram differed significantly among prey types and predator species, varying as much as sixfold across predator species. High values of ram resulted in high attack velocities. Jaw protrusion contributed as much as 50% to overall ram values in some species, verifying its role in enhancing attack velocity. Suction distance did not vary significantly among species. Diversity in prey-capture behavior was therefore found to reflect differences among species in the strategy used to approach prey. Limited variation in the distance from which prey were sucked into the mouth is interpreted as the result of an expected exponential decline in water velocity with distance from the mouth of the suction-feeding predator. We propose that this relationship represents a major constraint on the distance over which suction feeding is effective for all aquatic-feeding predators.

KW - Cichlid

KW - Feeding

KW - Feeding performance

KW - Index

KW - Prey capture

KW - Ram-suction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035745852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035745852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11551992

AN - SCOPUS:0035745852

VL - 204

SP - 3039

EP - 3051

JO - Journal of Experimental Biology

JF - Journal of Experimental Biology

SN - 0022-0949

IS - 17

ER -