Evaluating the performance of rarity as a surrogate in site prioritization for biodiversity conservation

Yaiyr Astudillo-Scalia, Fabio Suzart de Albuquerque

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

To solve the minimum-set coverage problem in conservation planning (representing the greatest number of species in the least number of sites), several metrics can be used to prioritize sites based on their conservation importance. Traditionally, species richness has been the most widely used approach, but previous studies suggest that it is one of the least effective. Alternative metrics such as complementarity algorithms have produced better results, for which they have been used in recent conservation studies. In this study, we assessed the performance of a new potential surrogate: rarity indices. Specifically, we tested rarity-weighted richness (RWR), index of summed rarity (ISR)and index of relative rarity (IRR), to determine if they are effective surrogates of biodiversity when solving the minimum-set coverage problem. We tested the rarity indices in 14 datasets spanning varying extents and grains, and found that rarity consistently outperformed species richness, even when accounting for the differences in rarity index performance. In some cases, rarity outperformed the complementarity solution, suggesting that it is a promising alternative surrogate that can be easily tested in situations where conservation action resources are limited. Rarity indices have been seldom assessed for their surrogacy effectiveness, and to the best of our knowledge, we are the first to test IRR and ISR in this context. Our results justify the need for future studies to elucidate the importance and applicability of rarity indices in conservation planning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere00639
JournalGlobal Ecology and Conservation
Volume18
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

prioritization
rarity
planning
biodiversity
species diversity
testing
conservation planning
complementarity
species richness
index

Keywords

  • Biodiversity conservation
  • Conservation planning
  • Rarity
  • Rarity indices

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Evaluating the performance of rarity as a surrogate in site prioritization for biodiversity conservation. / Astudillo-Scalia, Yaiyr; Suzart de Albuquerque, Fabio.

In: Global Ecology and Conservation, Vol. 18, e00639, 01.04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{23f5500408b247a19c493e0253a723f8,
title = "Evaluating the performance of rarity as a surrogate in site prioritization for biodiversity conservation",
abstract = "To solve the minimum-set coverage problem in conservation planning (representing the greatest number of species in the least number of sites), several metrics can be used to prioritize sites based on their conservation importance. Traditionally, species richness has been the most widely used approach, but previous studies suggest that it is one of the least effective. Alternative metrics such as complementarity algorithms have produced better results, for which they have been used in recent conservation studies. In this study, we assessed the performance of a new potential surrogate: rarity indices. Specifically, we tested rarity-weighted richness (RWR), index of summed rarity (ISR)and index of relative rarity (IRR), to determine if they are effective surrogates of biodiversity when solving the minimum-set coverage problem. We tested the rarity indices in 14 datasets spanning varying extents and grains, and found that rarity consistently outperformed species richness, even when accounting for the differences in rarity index performance. In some cases, rarity outperformed the complementarity solution, suggesting that it is a promising alternative surrogate that can be easily tested in situations where conservation action resources are limited. Rarity indices have been seldom assessed for their surrogacy effectiveness, and to the best of our knowledge, we are the first to test IRR and ISR in this context. Our results justify the need for future studies to elucidate the importance and applicability of rarity indices in conservation planning.",
keywords = "Biodiversity conservation, Conservation planning, Rarity, Rarity indices",
author = "Yaiyr Astudillo-Scalia and {Suzart de Albuquerque}, Fabio",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00639",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
journal = "Global Ecology and Conservation",
issn = "2351-9894",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the performance of rarity as a surrogate in site prioritization for biodiversity conservation

AU - Astudillo-Scalia, Yaiyr

AU - Suzart de Albuquerque, Fabio

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - To solve the minimum-set coverage problem in conservation planning (representing the greatest number of species in the least number of sites), several metrics can be used to prioritize sites based on their conservation importance. Traditionally, species richness has been the most widely used approach, but previous studies suggest that it is one of the least effective. Alternative metrics such as complementarity algorithms have produced better results, for which they have been used in recent conservation studies. In this study, we assessed the performance of a new potential surrogate: rarity indices. Specifically, we tested rarity-weighted richness (RWR), index of summed rarity (ISR)and index of relative rarity (IRR), to determine if they are effective surrogates of biodiversity when solving the minimum-set coverage problem. We tested the rarity indices in 14 datasets spanning varying extents and grains, and found that rarity consistently outperformed species richness, even when accounting for the differences in rarity index performance. In some cases, rarity outperformed the complementarity solution, suggesting that it is a promising alternative surrogate that can be easily tested in situations where conservation action resources are limited. Rarity indices have been seldom assessed for their surrogacy effectiveness, and to the best of our knowledge, we are the first to test IRR and ISR in this context. Our results justify the need for future studies to elucidate the importance and applicability of rarity indices in conservation planning.

AB - To solve the minimum-set coverage problem in conservation planning (representing the greatest number of species in the least number of sites), several metrics can be used to prioritize sites based on their conservation importance. Traditionally, species richness has been the most widely used approach, but previous studies suggest that it is one of the least effective. Alternative metrics such as complementarity algorithms have produced better results, for which they have been used in recent conservation studies. In this study, we assessed the performance of a new potential surrogate: rarity indices. Specifically, we tested rarity-weighted richness (RWR), index of summed rarity (ISR)and index of relative rarity (IRR), to determine if they are effective surrogates of biodiversity when solving the minimum-set coverage problem. We tested the rarity indices in 14 datasets spanning varying extents and grains, and found that rarity consistently outperformed species richness, even when accounting for the differences in rarity index performance. In some cases, rarity outperformed the complementarity solution, suggesting that it is a promising alternative surrogate that can be easily tested in situations where conservation action resources are limited. Rarity indices have been seldom assessed for their surrogacy effectiveness, and to the best of our knowledge, we are the first to test IRR and ISR in this context. Our results justify the need for future studies to elucidate the importance and applicability of rarity indices in conservation planning.

KW - Biodiversity conservation

KW - Conservation planning

KW - Rarity

KW - Rarity indices

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065829262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065829262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00639

DO - 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00639

M3 - Article

VL - 18

JO - Global Ecology and Conservation

JF - Global Ecology and Conservation

SN - 2351-9894

M1 - e00639

ER -