Evaluating the measurement properties of procedural justice in a correctional setting

Howard M. Henderson, William Wells, Edward Maguire, Jameel Gray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research and theory on the effects of fair procedures has gained popularity over the past decade. This is understandable given the inherent appeal of these ideas and the supporting evidence. Research suggests that authorities are able to secure compliance from subordinates when they use fair procedures and when they are viewed as legitimate. Unfortunately, empirical studies of procedural justice and legitimacy are hampered by weak measures of key theoretical constructs. The purpose of this study is to examine the measurement properties of procedural justice in a sample of inmates. Results show that a one-factor model of procedural justice fits the data well, though the authors find evidence of a method effect. Results also demonstrate important differences between the use of a summated procedural justice scale and a scale derived from a factor analysis. These findings illustrate the importance of paying careful attention to construct validity in measures of procedural justice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)384-399
Number of pages16
JournalCriminal Justice and Behavior
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Social Justice
justice
Illegitimacy
construct validity
Research
Statistical Factor Analysis
Compliance
popularity
evidence
factor analysis
appeal
legitimacy

Keywords

  • Corrections
  • Measurement validity
  • Procedural justice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Psychology(all)
  • Law

Cite this

Evaluating the measurement properties of procedural justice in a correctional setting. / Henderson, Howard M.; Wells, William; Maguire, Edward; Gray, Jameel.

In: Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 37, No. 4, 04.2010, p. 384-399.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Henderson, Howard M. ; Wells, William ; Maguire, Edward ; Gray, Jameel. / Evaluating the measurement properties of procedural justice in a correctional setting. In: Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2010 ; Vol. 37, No. 4. pp. 384-399.
@article{69e2ed1a6103425aa39fbc50c8153511,
title = "Evaluating the measurement properties of procedural justice in a correctional setting",
abstract = "Research and theory on the effects of fair procedures has gained popularity over the past decade. This is understandable given the inherent appeal of these ideas and the supporting evidence. Research suggests that authorities are able to secure compliance from subordinates when they use fair procedures and when they are viewed as legitimate. Unfortunately, empirical studies of procedural justice and legitimacy are hampered by weak measures of key theoretical constructs. The purpose of this study is to examine the measurement properties of procedural justice in a sample of inmates. Results show that a one-factor model of procedural justice fits the data well, though the authors find evidence of a method effect. Results also demonstrate important differences between the use of a summated procedural justice scale and a scale derived from a factor analysis. These findings illustrate the importance of paying careful attention to construct validity in measures of procedural justice.",
keywords = "Corrections, Measurement validity, Procedural justice",
author = "Henderson, {Howard M.} and William Wells and Edward Maguire and Jameel Gray",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1177/0093854809360193",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "384--399",
journal = "Criminal Justice and Behavior",
issn = "0093-8548",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the measurement properties of procedural justice in a correctional setting

AU - Henderson, Howard M.

AU - Wells, William

AU - Maguire, Edward

AU - Gray, Jameel

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - Research and theory on the effects of fair procedures has gained popularity over the past decade. This is understandable given the inherent appeal of these ideas and the supporting evidence. Research suggests that authorities are able to secure compliance from subordinates when they use fair procedures and when they are viewed as legitimate. Unfortunately, empirical studies of procedural justice and legitimacy are hampered by weak measures of key theoretical constructs. The purpose of this study is to examine the measurement properties of procedural justice in a sample of inmates. Results show that a one-factor model of procedural justice fits the data well, though the authors find evidence of a method effect. Results also demonstrate important differences between the use of a summated procedural justice scale and a scale derived from a factor analysis. These findings illustrate the importance of paying careful attention to construct validity in measures of procedural justice.

AB - Research and theory on the effects of fair procedures has gained popularity over the past decade. This is understandable given the inherent appeal of these ideas and the supporting evidence. Research suggests that authorities are able to secure compliance from subordinates when they use fair procedures and when they are viewed as legitimate. Unfortunately, empirical studies of procedural justice and legitimacy are hampered by weak measures of key theoretical constructs. The purpose of this study is to examine the measurement properties of procedural justice in a sample of inmates. Results show that a one-factor model of procedural justice fits the data well, though the authors find evidence of a method effect. Results also demonstrate important differences between the use of a summated procedural justice scale and a scale derived from a factor analysis. These findings illustrate the importance of paying careful attention to construct validity in measures of procedural justice.

KW - Corrections

KW - Measurement validity

KW - Procedural justice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649320188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649320188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0093854809360193

DO - 10.1177/0093854809360193

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77649320188

VL - 37

SP - 384

EP - 399

JO - Criminal Justice and Behavior

JF - Criminal Justice and Behavior

SN - 0093-8548

IS - 4

ER -