Evaluating the impact of prior record on judges' sentencing decisions

A seven-city comparison

Susan Welch, Cassia Spohn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is much agreement among social scientists that the prior criminal records of defendants are important in explaining the sentences given by judges. That being so, it is crucial to control for prior record when examining sentence discrepancies, such as between black and white defendants. However, when examining sentencing patterns, a remarkable variety of indicators has been used to measure prior record. It is very likely that different measures of prior record have different relationships to sentencing. Only fragmentary evidence of these differential relationships has been offered, however. We will add to our knowledge about the efficacy of different measures of prior record by examining numerous measures and analyzing their relationship to sentences levied on black and white defendants. Data from seven cities will be used in the analysis in order to try to understand the variation that might exist in these relationships.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)389-407
Number of pages19
JournalJustice Quarterly
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1986
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

social scientist
evidence
hydroquinone

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Evaluating the impact of prior record on judges' sentencing decisions : A seven-city comparison. / Welch, Susan; Spohn, Cassia.

In: Justice Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1986, p. 389-407.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1d901714553b473f917951909403ebf3,
title = "Evaluating the impact of prior record on judges' sentencing decisions: A seven-city comparison",
abstract = "There is much agreement among social scientists that the prior criminal records of defendants are important in explaining the sentences given by judges. That being so, it is crucial to control for prior record when examining sentence discrepancies, such as between black and white defendants. However, when examining sentencing patterns, a remarkable variety of indicators has been used to measure prior record. It is very likely that different measures of prior record have different relationships to sentencing. Only fragmentary evidence of these differential relationships has been offered, however. We will add to our knowledge about the efficacy of different measures of prior record by examining numerous measures and analyzing their relationship to sentences levied on black and white defendants. Data from seven cities will be used in the analysis in order to try to understand the variation that might exist in these relationships.",
author = "Susan Welch and Cassia Spohn",
year = "1986",
doi = "10.1080/07418828600089031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "389--407",
journal = "Justice Quarterly",
issn = "0741-8825",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the impact of prior record on judges' sentencing decisions

T2 - A seven-city comparison

AU - Welch, Susan

AU - Spohn, Cassia

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - There is much agreement among social scientists that the prior criminal records of defendants are important in explaining the sentences given by judges. That being so, it is crucial to control for prior record when examining sentence discrepancies, such as between black and white defendants. However, when examining sentencing patterns, a remarkable variety of indicators has been used to measure prior record. It is very likely that different measures of prior record have different relationships to sentencing. Only fragmentary evidence of these differential relationships has been offered, however. We will add to our knowledge about the efficacy of different measures of prior record by examining numerous measures and analyzing their relationship to sentences levied on black and white defendants. Data from seven cities will be used in the analysis in order to try to understand the variation that might exist in these relationships.

AB - There is much agreement among social scientists that the prior criminal records of defendants are important in explaining the sentences given by judges. That being so, it is crucial to control for prior record when examining sentence discrepancies, such as between black and white defendants. However, when examining sentencing patterns, a remarkable variety of indicators has been used to measure prior record. It is very likely that different measures of prior record have different relationships to sentencing. Only fragmentary evidence of these differential relationships has been offered, however. We will add to our knowledge about the efficacy of different measures of prior record by examining numerous measures and analyzing their relationship to sentences levied on black and white defendants. Data from seven cities will be used in the analysis in order to try to understand the variation that might exist in these relationships.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0011516539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0011516539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07418828600089031

DO - 10.1080/07418828600089031

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 389

EP - 407

JO - Justice Quarterly

JF - Justice Quarterly

SN - 0741-8825

IS - 4

ER -