Evaluating the ENVI-met microscale model for suitability in analysis of targeted urban heat mitigation strategies

Peter J. Crank, David Sailor, George Ban-Weiss, Mohammad Taleghani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Microscale atmospheric models are increasingly being used to project the thermal benefits of urban heat mitigation strategies (e.g., tree planting programs or use of high-albedo materials). However, prior to investment in specific mitigation efforts by local governments, it is desirable to test and validate the computational models used to evaluate strategies. While some prior studies have conducted limited evaluations of the ENVI-met microscale climate model for specific case studies, there has been relatively little systematic testing of the model's sensitivity to variations in model input and control parameters. This study builds on the limited foundation of past validation efforts by addressing two questions: (1) is ENVI-met grid independent; and (2) can the model adequately represent the air temperature perturbations associated with heat mitigation strategies? To test grid independence, a “flat” domain is tested with six vertical grid resolutions ranging from 0.75 to 2.0 m. To examine the second question, a control and two mitigation strategy simulations of idealized city blocks are tested. Results show a failure of grid independence in the “flat” domain simulations. Given that the mitigation strategies result in temperature changes that are an order of magnitude larger than the errors introduced by grid dependence for the flat domain, a lack of grid independence itself does not necessarily invalidate the use of ENVI-met for heat mitigation research. However, due to limitations in grid structure of the ENVI-met model, it was not possible to test grid dependence for more complicated simulations involving domains with buildings. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether existing efforts at model validation provide any assurance that the model adequately captures vertical mixing and exchange of heat from the ground to rooftop level. Thus, there remain concerns regarding the usefulness of the model for evaluating heat mitigation strategies, particularly when applied at roof level (e.g. high albedo or vegetated roofs).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)188-197
Number of pages10
JournalUrban Climate
Volume26
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

heat
mitigation
roof
albedo
simulation
tree planting
model validation
vertical mixing
analysis
local government
climate modeling
air temperature
perturbation
building
air
climate
test
lack
temperature
evaluation

Keywords

  • ENVI-met
  • Grid sensitivity
  • Heat mitigation strategies
  • Model validation
  • Urban climate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Urban Studies
  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Evaluating the ENVI-met microscale model for suitability in analysis of targeted urban heat mitigation strategies. / Crank, Peter J.; Sailor, David; Ban-Weiss, George; Taleghani, Mohammad.

In: Urban Climate, Vol. 26, 01.12.2018, p. 188-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Crank, Peter J. ; Sailor, David ; Ban-Weiss, George ; Taleghani, Mohammad. / Evaluating the ENVI-met microscale model for suitability in analysis of targeted urban heat mitigation strategies. In: Urban Climate. 2018 ; Vol. 26. pp. 188-197.
@article{70e9f9029bf54e8bb3e517b61cbbb853,
title = "Evaluating the ENVI-met microscale model for suitability in analysis of targeted urban heat mitigation strategies",
abstract = "Microscale atmospheric models are increasingly being used to project the thermal benefits of urban heat mitigation strategies (e.g., tree planting programs or use of high-albedo materials). However, prior to investment in specific mitigation efforts by local governments, it is desirable to test and validate the computational models used to evaluate strategies. While some prior studies have conducted limited evaluations of the ENVI-met microscale climate model for specific case studies, there has been relatively little systematic testing of the model's sensitivity to variations in model input and control parameters. This study builds on the limited foundation of past validation efforts by addressing two questions: (1) is ENVI-met grid independent; and (2) can the model adequately represent the air temperature perturbations associated with heat mitigation strategies? To test grid independence, a “flat” domain is tested with six vertical grid resolutions ranging from 0.75 to 2.0 m. To examine the second question, a control and two mitigation strategy simulations of idealized city blocks are tested. Results show a failure of grid independence in the “flat” domain simulations. Given that the mitigation strategies result in temperature changes that are an order of magnitude larger than the errors introduced by grid dependence for the flat domain, a lack of grid independence itself does not necessarily invalidate the use of ENVI-met for heat mitigation research. However, due to limitations in grid structure of the ENVI-met model, it was not possible to test grid dependence for more complicated simulations involving domains with buildings. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether existing efforts at model validation provide any assurance that the model adequately captures vertical mixing and exchange of heat from the ground to rooftop level. Thus, there remain concerns regarding the usefulness of the model for evaluating heat mitigation strategies, particularly when applied at roof level (e.g. high albedo or vegetated roofs).",
keywords = "ENVI-met, Grid sensitivity, Heat mitigation strategies, Model validation, Urban climate",
author = "Crank, {Peter J.} and David Sailor and George Ban-Weiss and Mohammad Taleghani",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.uclim.2018.09.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "188--197",
journal = "Urban Climate",
issn = "2212-0955",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the ENVI-met microscale model for suitability in analysis of targeted urban heat mitigation strategies

AU - Crank, Peter J.

AU - Sailor, David

AU - Ban-Weiss, George

AU - Taleghani, Mohammad

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Microscale atmospheric models are increasingly being used to project the thermal benefits of urban heat mitigation strategies (e.g., tree planting programs or use of high-albedo materials). However, prior to investment in specific mitigation efforts by local governments, it is desirable to test and validate the computational models used to evaluate strategies. While some prior studies have conducted limited evaluations of the ENVI-met microscale climate model for specific case studies, there has been relatively little systematic testing of the model's sensitivity to variations in model input and control parameters. This study builds on the limited foundation of past validation efforts by addressing two questions: (1) is ENVI-met grid independent; and (2) can the model adequately represent the air temperature perturbations associated with heat mitigation strategies? To test grid independence, a “flat” domain is tested with six vertical grid resolutions ranging from 0.75 to 2.0 m. To examine the second question, a control and two mitigation strategy simulations of idealized city blocks are tested. Results show a failure of grid independence in the “flat” domain simulations. Given that the mitigation strategies result in temperature changes that are an order of magnitude larger than the errors introduced by grid dependence for the flat domain, a lack of grid independence itself does not necessarily invalidate the use of ENVI-met for heat mitigation research. However, due to limitations in grid structure of the ENVI-met model, it was not possible to test grid dependence for more complicated simulations involving domains with buildings. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether existing efforts at model validation provide any assurance that the model adequately captures vertical mixing and exchange of heat from the ground to rooftop level. Thus, there remain concerns regarding the usefulness of the model for evaluating heat mitigation strategies, particularly when applied at roof level (e.g. high albedo or vegetated roofs).

AB - Microscale atmospheric models are increasingly being used to project the thermal benefits of urban heat mitigation strategies (e.g., tree planting programs or use of high-albedo materials). However, prior to investment in specific mitigation efforts by local governments, it is desirable to test and validate the computational models used to evaluate strategies. While some prior studies have conducted limited evaluations of the ENVI-met microscale climate model for specific case studies, there has been relatively little systematic testing of the model's sensitivity to variations in model input and control parameters. This study builds on the limited foundation of past validation efforts by addressing two questions: (1) is ENVI-met grid independent; and (2) can the model adequately represent the air temperature perturbations associated with heat mitigation strategies? To test grid independence, a “flat” domain is tested with six vertical grid resolutions ranging from 0.75 to 2.0 m. To examine the second question, a control and two mitigation strategy simulations of idealized city blocks are tested. Results show a failure of grid independence in the “flat” domain simulations. Given that the mitigation strategies result in temperature changes that are an order of magnitude larger than the errors introduced by grid dependence for the flat domain, a lack of grid independence itself does not necessarily invalidate the use of ENVI-met for heat mitigation research. However, due to limitations in grid structure of the ENVI-met model, it was not possible to test grid dependence for more complicated simulations involving domains with buildings. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether existing efforts at model validation provide any assurance that the model adequately captures vertical mixing and exchange of heat from the ground to rooftop level. Thus, there remain concerns regarding the usefulness of the model for evaluating heat mitigation strategies, particularly when applied at roof level (e.g. high albedo or vegetated roofs).

KW - ENVI-met

KW - Grid sensitivity

KW - Heat mitigation strategies

KW - Model validation

KW - Urban climate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053383008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053383008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.uclim.2018.09.002

DO - 10.1016/j.uclim.2018.09.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85053383008

VL - 26

SP - 188

EP - 197

JO - Urban Climate

JF - Urban Climate

SN - 2212-0955

ER -