Evaluating scaling models in biology using hierarchical Bayesian approaches

Charles A. Price, Kiona Ogle, Ethan P. White, Joshua S. Weitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Theoretical models for allometric relationships between organismal form and function are typically tested by comparing a single predicted relationship with empirical data. Several prominent models, however, predict more than one allometric relationship, and comparisons among alternative models have not taken this into account. Here we evaluate several different scaling models of plant morphology within a hierarchical Bayesian framework that simultaneously fits multiple scaling relationships to three large allometric datasets. The scaling models include: inflexible universal models derived from biophysical assumptions (e.g. elastic similarity or fractal networks), a flexible variation of a fractal network model, and a highly flexible model constrained only by basic algebraic relationships. We demonstrate that variation in intraspecific allometric scaling exponents is inconsistent with the universal models, and that more flexible approaches that allow for biological variability at the species level outperform universal models, even when accounting for relative increases in model complexity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)641-651
Number of pages11
JournalEcology Letters
Volume12
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Biological Sciences
plant morphology

Keywords

  • Allometry
  • Elastic similarity
  • Fractal
  • Geometric similarity
  • Hierarchical Bayes
  • Leaves
  • Scaling
  • Stress similarity
  • Trees

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Evaluating scaling models in biology using hierarchical Bayesian approaches. / Price, Charles A.; Ogle, Kiona; White, Ethan P.; Weitz, Joshua S.

In: Ecology Letters, Vol. 12, No. 7, 07.2009, p. 641-651.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Price, Charles A. ; Ogle, Kiona ; White, Ethan P. ; Weitz, Joshua S. / Evaluating scaling models in biology using hierarchical Bayesian approaches. In: Ecology Letters. 2009 ; Vol. 12, No. 7. pp. 641-651.
@article{a4528a43703f4ce189094c3e4a9056d5,
title = "Evaluating scaling models in biology using hierarchical Bayesian approaches",
abstract = "Theoretical models for allometric relationships between organismal form and function are typically tested by comparing a single predicted relationship with empirical data. Several prominent models, however, predict more than one allometric relationship, and comparisons among alternative models have not taken this into account. Here we evaluate several different scaling models of plant morphology within a hierarchical Bayesian framework that simultaneously fits multiple scaling relationships to three large allometric datasets. The scaling models include: inflexible universal models derived from biophysical assumptions (e.g. elastic similarity or fractal networks), a flexible variation of a fractal network model, and a highly flexible model constrained only by basic algebraic relationships. We demonstrate that variation in intraspecific allometric scaling exponents is inconsistent with the universal models, and that more flexible approaches that allow for biological variability at the species level outperform universal models, even when accounting for relative increases in model complexity.",
keywords = "Allometry, Elastic similarity, Fractal, Geometric similarity, Hierarchical Bayes, Leaves, Scaling, Stress similarity, Trees",
author = "Price, {Charles A.} and Kiona Ogle and White, {Ethan P.} and Weitz, {Joshua S.}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01316.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "641--651",
journal = "Ecology Letters",
issn = "1461-023X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating scaling models in biology using hierarchical Bayesian approaches

AU - Price, Charles A.

AU - Ogle, Kiona

AU - White, Ethan P.

AU - Weitz, Joshua S.

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - Theoretical models for allometric relationships between organismal form and function are typically tested by comparing a single predicted relationship with empirical data. Several prominent models, however, predict more than one allometric relationship, and comparisons among alternative models have not taken this into account. Here we evaluate several different scaling models of plant morphology within a hierarchical Bayesian framework that simultaneously fits multiple scaling relationships to three large allometric datasets. The scaling models include: inflexible universal models derived from biophysical assumptions (e.g. elastic similarity or fractal networks), a flexible variation of a fractal network model, and a highly flexible model constrained only by basic algebraic relationships. We demonstrate that variation in intraspecific allometric scaling exponents is inconsistent with the universal models, and that more flexible approaches that allow for biological variability at the species level outperform universal models, even when accounting for relative increases in model complexity.

AB - Theoretical models for allometric relationships between organismal form and function are typically tested by comparing a single predicted relationship with empirical data. Several prominent models, however, predict more than one allometric relationship, and comparisons among alternative models have not taken this into account. Here we evaluate several different scaling models of plant morphology within a hierarchical Bayesian framework that simultaneously fits multiple scaling relationships to three large allometric datasets. The scaling models include: inflexible universal models derived from biophysical assumptions (e.g. elastic similarity or fractal networks), a flexible variation of a fractal network model, and a highly flexible model constrained only by basic algebraic relationships. We demonstrate that variation in intraspecific allometric scaling exponents is inconsistent with the universal models, and that more flexible approaches that allow for biological variability at the species level outperform universal models, even when accounting for relative increases in model complexity.

KW - Allometry

KW - Elastic similarity

KW - Fractal

KW - Geometric similarity

KW - Hierarchical Bayes

KW - Leaves

KW - Scaling

KW - Stress similarity

KW - Trees

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66749098471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66749098471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01316.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01316.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 19453621

AN - SCOPUS:66749098471

VL - 12

SP - 641

EP - 651

JO - Ecology Letters

JF - Ecology Letters

SN - 1461-023X

IS - 7

ER -