Evaluating process in child and family interventions: Aggression prevention as an example

Patrick H. Tolan, Laura Hanish, Mary M. McKay, Mitchell H. Dickey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reports on 2 studies designed to develop and validate a set of measures for use in evaluating processes of child and family interventions. In Study 1 responses from 187 families attending an outpatient clinic for child behavior problems were factor analyzed to identify scales, consistent across sources: Alliance (Satisfactory Relationship with Interventionist and Program Satisfaction), Parenting Skill Attainment, Child Cooperation During Session, Child Prosocial Behavior, and Child Aggressive Behavior. Study 2 focused on patterns of scale scores among 78 families taking part in a 22-week preventive intervention designed to affect family relationships, parenting, and child antisocial and prosocial behaviors. The factor structure identified in Study 1 was replicated. Scale construct validity was demonstrated through across-source convergence, sensitivity to intervention change, and ability to discriminate individual differences. Path analysis validated the scales' utility in explaining key aspects of the intervention process. Implications for evaluating processes in family interventions are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)220-236
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Family Psychology
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Aggression
Child Behavior
Parenting
Aptitude
Family Relations
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Individuality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Evaluating process in child and family interventions : Aggression prevention as an example. / Tolan, Patrick H.; Hanish, Laura; McKay, Mary M.; Dickey, Mitchell H.

In: Journal of Family Psychology, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2002, p. 220-236.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tolan, Patrick H. ; Hanish, Laura ; McKay, Mary M. ; Dickey, Mitchell H. / Evaluating process in child and family interventions : Aggression prevention as an example. In: Journal of Family Psychology. 2002 ; Vol. 16, No. 2. pp. 220-236.
@article{0c626163cb8c48b1a7037bef1547be25,
title = "Evaluating process in child and family interventions: Aggression prevention as an example",
abstract = "This article reports on 2 studies designed to develop and validate a set of measures for use in evaluating processes of child and family interventions. In Study 1 responses from 187 families attending an outpatient clinic for child behavior problems were factor analyzed to identify scales, consistent across sources: Alliance (Satisfactory Relationship with Interventionist and Program Satisfaction), Parenting Skill Attainment, Child Cooperation During Session, Child Prosocial Behavior, and Child Aggressive Behavior. Study 2 focused on patterns of scale scores among 78 families taking part in a 22-week preventive intervention designed to affect family relationships, parenting, and child antisocial and prosocial behaviors. The factor structure identified in Study 1 was replicated. Scale construct validity was demonstrated through across-source convergence, sensitivity to intervention change, and ability to discriminate individual differences. Path analysis validated the scales' utility in explaining key aspects of the intervention process. Implications for evaluating processes in family interventions are discussed.",
author = "Tolan, {Patrick H.} and Laura Hanish and McKay, {Mary M.} and Dickey, {Mitchell H.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1037/0893-3200.16.2.220",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "220--236",
journal = "Journal of Family Psychology",
issn = "0893-3200",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating process in child and family interventions

T2 - Aggression prevention as an example

AU - Tolan, Patrick H.

AU - Hanish, Laura

AU - McKay, Mary M.

AU - Dickey, Mitchell H.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - This article reports on 2 studies designed to develop and validate a set of measures for use in evaluating processes of child and family interventions. In Study 1 responses from 187 families attending an outpatient clinic for child behavior problems were factor analyzed to identify scales, consistent across sources: Alliance (Satisfactory Relationship with Interventionist and Program Satisfaction), Parenting Skill Attainment, Child Cooperation During Session, Child Prosocial Behavior, and Child Aggressive Behavior. Study 2 focused on patterns of scale scores among 78 families taking part in a 22-week preventive intervention designed to affect family relationships, parenting, and child antisocial and prosocial behaviors. The factor structure identified in Study 1 was replicated. Scale construct validity was demonstrated through across-source convergence, sensitivity to intervention change, and ability to discriminate individual differences. Path analysis validated the scales' utility in explaining key aspects of the intervention process. Implications for evaluating processes in family interventions are discussed.

AB - This article reports on 2 studies designed to develop and validate a set of measures for use in evaluating processes of child and family interventions. In Study 1 responses from 187 families attending an outpatient clinic for child behavior problems were factor analyzed to identify scales, consistent across sources: Alliance (Satisfactory Relationship with Interventionist and Program Satisfaction), Parenting Skill Attainment, Child Cooperation During Session, Child Prosocial Behavior, and Child Aggressive Behavior. Study 2 focused on patterns of scale scores among 78 families taking part in a 22-week preventive intervention designed to affect family relationships, parenting, and child antisocial and prosocial behaviors. The factor structure identified in Study 1 was replicated. Scale construct validity was demonstrated through across-source convergence, sensitivity to intervention change, and ability to discriminate individual differences. Path analysis validated the scales' utility in explaining key aspects of the intervention process. Implications for evaluating processes in family interventions are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035983908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035983908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0893-3200.16.2.220

DO - 10.1037/0893-3200.16.2.220

M3 - Article

C2 - 12085734

AN - SCOPUS:0035983908

VL - 16

SP - 220

EP - 236

JO - Journal of Family Psychology

JF - Journal of Family Psychology

SN - 0893-3200

IS - 2

ER -