Evaluating Model Fit for Growth Curve Models

Integration of Fit Indices From SEM and MLM Frameworks

Wei Wu, Stephen West, Aaron B. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

92 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evaluating overall model fit for growth curve models involves 3 challenging issues. (a) Three types of longitudinal data with different implications for model fit may be distinguished: balanced on time with complete data, balanced on time with data missing at random, and unbalanced on time. (b) Traditional work on fit from the structural equation modeling (SEM) perspective has focused only on the covariance structure, but growth curve models have four potential sources of misspecification: within-individual covariance matrix, between-individuals covariance matrix, marginal mean structure, and conditional mean structure. (c) Growth curve models can be estimated in both the SEM and multilevel modeling (MLM) frameworks; these have different emphases for the evaluation of model fit. In this article, the authors discuss the challenges presented by these 3 issues in the calculation and interpretation of SEM- and MLM-based fit indices for growth curve models and conclude by identifying some lines for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)183-201
Number of pages19
JournalPsychological Methods
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

Growth
Growth Curve
Multilevel Modeling
Structural Equation Modeling

Keywords

  • growth curve modeling
  • longitudinal data
  • model fit
  • multilevel modeling
  • structural equation modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology (miscellaneous)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Evaluating Model Fit for Growth Curve Models : Integration of Fit Indices From SEM and MLM Frameworks. / Wu, Wei; West, Stephen; Taylor, Aaron B.

In: Psychological Methods, Vol. 14, No. 3, 09.2009, p. 183-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{289d6cd3bb6a487fab54f0b80943fe80,
title = "Evaluating Model Fit for Growth Curve Models: Integration of Fit Indices From SEM and MLM Frameworks",
abstract = "Evaluating overall model fit for growth curve models involves 3 challenging issues. (a) Three types of longitudinal data with different implications for model fit may be distinguished: balanced on time with complete data, balanced on time with data missing at random, and unbalanced on time. (b) Traditional work on fit from the structural equation modeling (SEM) perspective has focused only on the covariance structure, but growth curve models have four potential sources of misspecification: within-individual covariance matrix, between-individuals covariance matrix, marginal mean structure, and conditional mean structure. (c) Growth curve models can be estimated in both the SEM and multilevel modeling (MLM) frameworks; these have different emphases for the evaluation of model fit. In this article, the authors discuss the challenges presented by these 3 issues in the calculation and interpretation of SEM- and MLM-based fit indices for growth curve models and conclude by identifying some lines for future research.",
keywords = "growth curve modeling, longitudinal data, model fit, multilevel modeling, structural equation modeling",
author = "Wei Wu and Stephen West and Taylor, {Aaron B.}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1037/a0015858",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "183--201",
journal = "Psychological Methods",
issn = "1082-989X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating Model Fit for Growth Curve Models

T2 - Integration of Fit Indices From SEM and MLM Frameworks

AU - Wu, Wei

AU - West, Stephen

AU - Taylor, Aaron B.

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Evaluating overall model fit for growth curve models involves 3 challenging issues. (a) Three types of longitudinal data with different implications for model fit may be distinguished: balanced on time with complete data, balanced on time with data missing at random, and unbalanced on time. (b) Traditional work on fit from the structural equation modeling (SEM) perspective has focused only on the covariance structure, but growth curve models have four potential sources of misspecification: within-individual covariance matrix, between-individuals covariance matrix, marginal mean structure, and conditional mean structure. (c) Growth curve models can be estimated in both the SEM and multilevel modeling (MLM) frameworks; these have different emphases for the evaluation of model fit. In this article, the authors discuss the challenges presented by these 3 issues in the calculation and interpretation of SEM- and MLM-based fit indices for growth curve models and conclude by identifying some lines for future research.

AB - Evaluating overall model fit for growth curve models involves 3 challenging issues. (a) Three types of longitudinal data with different implications for model fit may be distinguished: balanced on time with complete data, balanced on time with data missing at random, and unbalanced on time. (b) Traditional work on fit from the structural equation modeling (SEM) perspective has focused only on the covariance structure, but growth curve models have four potential sources of misspecification: within-individual covariance matrix, between-individuals covariance matrix, marginal mean structure, and conditional mean structure. (c) Growth curve models can be estimated in both the SEM and multilevel modeling (MLM) frameworks; these have different emphases for the evaluation of model fit. In this article, the authors discuss the challenges presented by these 3 issues in the calculation and interpretation of SEM- and MLM-based fit indices for growth curve models and conclude by identifying some lines for future research.

KW - growth curve modeling

KW - longitudinal data

KW - model fit

KW - multilevel modeling

KW - structural equation modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70249111205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70249111205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0015858

DO - 10.1037/a0015858

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 183

EP - 201

JO - Psychological Methods

JF - Psychological Methods

SN - 1082-989X

IS - 3

ER -