Evaluating journal quality: Is the H-index a better measure than impact factors?

David Hodge, Jeffrey R. Lacasse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluates the utility of a new measure-the h-index-that may provide a more valid approach to evaluating journal quality in the social work profession. Method: H-index values are compared with Thomson ISI 5-year impact factors and expert opinion. Results: As hypothesized, the h-index correlates highly with ISI 5-year impact factors; but exhibits closer agreement with expert opinion, particularly with high familiarity disciplinary journals. Conclusions: This evidence of convergent and discriminatory validity suggests that the h-index may have some utility in assessing social work journals. Notable advantages of the h-index include its compatibility with the profession's applied research culture and its ability to be used with essentially all journals in which social workers publish.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)222-230
Number of pages9
JournalResearch on Social Work Practice
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Expert Testimony
Social Work
social work
Aptitude
profession
expert
social worker
Research
ability
evidence
Recognition (Psychology)
Social Workers

Keywords

  • Bibliometrics
  • h-index
  • Impact factors
  • Journal quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Evaluating journal quality : Is the H-index a better measure than impact factors? / Hodge, David; Lacasse, Jeffrey R.

In: Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 21, No. 2, 03.2011, p. 222-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dde7ca568ac84a42a01e7276a33fc165,
title = "Evaluating journal quality: Is the H-index a better measure than impact factors?",
abstract = "Objectives: This study evaluates the utility of a new measure-the h-index-that may provide a more valid approach to evaluating journal quality in the social work profession. Method: H-index values are compared with Thomson ISI 5-year impact factors and expert opinion. Results: As hypothesized, the h-index correlates highly with ISI 5-year impact factors; but exhibits closer agreement with expert opinion, particularly with high familiarity disciplinary journals. Conclusions: This evidence of convergent and discriminatory validity suggests that the h-index may have some utility in assessing social work journals. Notable advantages of the h-index include its compatibility with the profession's applied research culture and its ability to be used with essentially all journals in which social workers publish.",
keywords = "Bibliometrics, h-index, Impact factors, Journal quality",
author = "David Hodge and Lacasse, {Jeffrey R.}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/1049731510369141",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "222--230",
journal = "Research on Social Work Practice",
issn = "1049-7315",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating journal quality

T2 - Is the H-index a better measure than impact factors?

AU - Hodge, David

AU - Lacasse, Jeffrey R.

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Objectives: This study evaluates the utility of a new measure-the h-index-that may provide a more valid approach to evaluating journal quality in the social work profession. Method: H-index values are compared with Thomson ISI 5-year impact factors and expert opinion. Results: As hypothesized, the h-index correlates highly with ISI 5-year impact factors; but exhibits closer agreement with expert opinion, particularly with high familiarity disciplinary journals. Conclusions: This evidence of convergent and discriminatory validity suggests that the h-index may have some utility in assessing social work journals. Notable advantages of the h-index include its compatibility with the profession's applied research culture and its ability to be used with essentially all journals in which social workers publish.

AB - Objectives: This study evaluates the utility of a new measure-the h-index-that may provide a more valid approach to evaluating journal quality in the social work profession. Method: H-index values are compared with Thomson ISI 5-year impact factors and expert opinion. Results: As hypothesized, the h-index correlates highly with ISI 5-year impact factors; but exhibits closer agreement with expert opinion, particularly with high familiarity disciplinary journals. Conclusions: This evidence of convergent and discriminatory validity suggests that the h-index may have some utility in assessing social work journals. Notable advantages of the h-index include its compatibility with the profession's applied research culture and its ability to be used with essentially all journals in which social workers publish.

KW - Bibliometrics

KW - h-index

KW - Impact factors

KW - Journal quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79751513620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79751513620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1049731510369141

DO - 10.1177/1049731510369141

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79751513620

VL - 21

SP - 222

EP - 230

JO - Research on Social Work Practice

JF - Research on Social Work Practice

SN - 1049-7315

IS - 2

ER -