Ethics in the production and dissemination of management research: Institutional failure or individual fallibility?

Benson Honig, Joseph Lampel, Donald Siegel, Paul Drnevich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

Over the past 50 years, we have witnessed considerable growth in business education, increased competition among business schools, and higher expectations for faculty scholarship. Increasing competition among scholars for limited publication opportunities in top-tier journals and the proliferation of bottom-tier journals has given rise to a variety of systemic ethical issues and dilemmas, for scholars and their institutions. In this article, we critically examine the current state of normative publishing activities and expectations, including doctoral education, promotion and tenure processes and research expectations, editorial and peer review processes, academic freedom, acceptable breadth, depth, and accuracy or legitimacy of research designs and methodologies, academic integrity, replication, and data availability concerning the trends and implications of contemporary and future management scholarship. We also provide recommendations for additional research and discussion on these issues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)118-142
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Management Studies
Volume51
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Education
  • Ethics
  • Journals
  • Management research
  • Publication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Ethics in the production and dissemination of management research: Institutional failure or individual fallibility?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this