Ethical Concerns About Private (and Public) Corrections: Extending the Focus Beyond Profit- Making and the Delegation of Punishment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Common criticisms of privatized corrections are that tying punishment to profits is unethical and that the administration of punishment should not be delegated to private entities. Such criticisms are important to consider but other ethical concerns also arise when privatizing corrections. For example, do private correctional entities protect individuals’ rights? The focus on profit-making also overlooks ethical considerations that arise with public corrections. Indeed, focusing only on the ethics of financially incentivizing punishment or the delegation of punishment obscures important nuances about the ethics of privatization and corrections generally. To these ends, a framework is presented that highlights that a range of ethical considerations attend to private corrections as well as to public corrections. It also reveals that a focus on ethics, while a good unto itself, could improve the effectiveness and efficiency of private and public corrections.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCriminal Justice Policy Review
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

penalty
profit
moral philosophy
criticism
privatization
efficiency

Keywords

  • ethics
  • private prisons
  • privatized corrections
  • public corrections

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

@article{9c30f281dc5840949c6954aff8864f06,
title = "Ethical Concerns About Private (and Public) Corrections: Extending the Focus Beyond Profit- Making and the Delegation of Punishment",
abstract = "Common criticisms of privatized corrections are that tying punishment to profits is unethical and that the administration of punishment should not be delegated to private entities. Such criticisms are important to consider but other ethical concerns also arise when privatizing corrections. For example, do private correctional entities protect individuals’ rights? The focus on profit-making also overlooks ethical considerations that arise with public corrections. Indeed, focusing only on the ethics of financially incentivizing punishment or the delegation of punishment obscures important nuances about the ethics of privatization and corrections generally. To these ends, a framework is presented that highlights that a range of ethical considerations attend to private corrections as well as to public corrections. It also reveals that a focus on ethics, while a good unto itself, could improve the effectiveness and efficiency of private and public corrections.",
keywords = "ethics, private prisons, privatized corrections, public corrections",
author = "Montes, {Andrea N.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0887403419870851",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Criminal Justice Policy Review",
issn = "0887-4034",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical Concerns About Private (and Public) Corrections

T2 - Extending the Focus Beyond Profit- Making and the Delegation of Punishment

AU - Montes, Andrea N.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Common criticisms of privatized corrections are that tying punishment to profits is unethical and that the administration of punishment should not be delegated to private entities. Such criticisms are important to consider but other ethical concerns also arise when privatizing corrections. For example, do private correctional entities protect individuals’ rights? The focus on profit-making also overlooks ethical considerations that arise with public corrections. Indeed, focusing only on the ethics of financially incentivizing punishment or the delegation of punishment obscures important nuances about the ethics of privatization and corrections generally. To these ends, a framework is presented that highlights that a range of ethical considerations attend to private corrections as well as to public corrections. It also reveals that a focus on ethics, while a good unto itself, could improve the effectiveness and efficiency of private and public corrections.

AB - Common criticisms of privatized corrections are that tying punishment to profits is unethical and that the administration of punishment should not be delegated to private entities. Such criticisms are important to consider but other ethical concerns also arise when privatizing corrections. For example, do private correctional entities protect individuals’ rights? The focus on profit-making also overlooks ethical considerations that arise with public corrections. Indeed, focusing only on the ethics of financially incentivizing punishment or the delegation of punishment obscures important nuances about the ethics of privatization and corrections generally. To these ends, a framework is presented that highlights that a range of ethical considerations attend to private corrections as well as to public corrections. It also reveals that a focus on ethics, while a good unto itself, could improve the effectiveness and efficiency of private and public corrections.

KW - ethics

KW - private prisons

KW - privatized corrections

KW - public corrections

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071552942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071552942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0887403419870851

DO - 10.1177/0887403419870851

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85071552942

JO - Criminal Justice Policy Review

JF - Criminal Justice Policy Review

SN - 0887-4034

ER -