Ethical Concerns About Private (and Public) Corrections: Extending the Focus Beyond Profit- Making and the Delegation of Punishment

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Common criticisms of privatized corrections are that tying punishment to profits is unethical and that the administration of punishment should not be delegated to private entities. Such criticisms are important to consider but other ethical concerns also arise when privatizing corrections. For example, do private correctional entities protect individuals’ rights? The focus on profit-making also overlooks ethical considerations that arise with public corrections. Indeed, focusing only on the ethics of financially incentivizing punishment or the delegation of punishment obscures important nuances about the ethics of privatization and corrections generally. To these ends, a framework is presented that highlights that a range of ethical considerations attend to private corrections as well as to public corrections. It also reveals that a focus on ethics, while a good unto itself, could improve the effectiveness and efficiency of private and public corrections.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)609-630
    Number of pages22
    JournalCriminal Justice Policy Review
    Volume31
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 1 2020

    Keywords

    • ethics
    • private prisons
    • privatized corrections
    • public corrections

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Ethical Concerns About Private (and Public) Corrections: Extending the Focus Beyond Profit- Making and the Delegation of Punishment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this