### Abstract

A compelling problem in a population is to estimate the number of people the average person knows. A consequential related problem is to estimate the size of important subpopulations. A random sample of a population is asked whether they know anyone in a given subpopulation of size e, thus yielding an estimate of the probability that this occurs in the population. Using an equal likelihood probability model, this leads to a lower bound estimate for c, the average number of people a person in the population knows. When the number of people a person knows has a binomial distribution over the population this value is an estimate for c itself. Here we test this method on data from Mexico City, where a large random sample of people was asked whether they knew anyone in each of several different subpopulations in Mexico City of known and unknown sizes. We develop procedures for obtaining various bounds and estimates for c and determine some of the respondents' attributes on which variation in probability of knowing someone in a subpopulation and variation in personal network size seem to depend. We apply these to the estimation of e for rape victims in Mexico City and the estimation of c from data on AIDS victims in the United States.

Original language | English (US) |
---|---|

Pages (from-to) | 109-121 |

Number of pages | 13 |

Journal | Social Science Research |

Volume | 20 |

Issue number | 2 |

DOIs | |

State | Published - Jan 1 1991 |

Externally published | Yes |

### Fingerprint

### ASJC Scopus subject areas

- Education
- Sociology and Political Science

### Cite this

*Social Science Research*,

*20*(2), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X(91)90012-R

**Estimating the size of an average personal network and of an event subpopulation : Some empirical results.** / Bernard, Harvey; Johnsen, Eugene C.; Killworth, Peter D.; Robinson, Scott.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

*Social Science Research*, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X(91)90012-R

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating the size of an average personal network and of an event subpopulation

T2 - Some empirical results

AU - Bernard, Harvey

AU - Johnsen, Eugene C.

AU - Killworth, Peter D.

AU - Robinson, Scott

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - A compelling problem in a population is to estimate the number of people the average person knows. A consequential related problem is to estimate the size of important subpopulations. A random sample of a population is asked whether they know anyone in a given subpopulation of size e, thus yielding an estimate of the probability that this occurs in the population. Using an equal likelihood probability model, this leads to a lower bound estimate for c, the average number of people a person in the population knows. When the number of people a person knows has a binomial distribution over the population this value is an estimate for c itself. Here we test this method on data from Mexico City, where a large random sample of people was asked whether they knew anyone in each of several different subpopulations in Mexico City of known and unknown sizes. We develop procedures for obtaining various bounds and estimates for c and determine some of the respondents' attributes on which variation in probability of knowing someone in a subpopulation and variation in personal network size seem to depend. We apply these to the estimation of e for rape victims in Mexico City and the estimation of c from data on AIDS victims in the United States.

AB - A compelling problem in a population is to estimate the number of people the average person knows. A consequential related problem is to estimate the size of important subpopulations. A random sample of a population is asked whether they know anyone in a given subpopulation of size e, thus yielding an estimate of the probability that this occurs in the population. Using an equal likelihood probability model, this leads to a lower bound estimate for c, the average number of people a person in the population knows. When the number of people a person knows has a binomial distribution over the population this value is an estimate for c itself. Here we test this method on data from Mexico City, where a large random sample of people was asked whether they knew anyone in each of several different subpopulations in Mexico City of known and unknown sizes. We develop procedures for obtaining various bounds and estimates for c and determine some of the respondents' attributes on which variation in probability of knowing someone in a subpopulation and variation in personal network size seem to depend. We apply these to the estimation of e for rape victims in Mexico City and the estimation of c from data on AIDS victims in the United States.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000763727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000763727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0049-089X(91)90012-R

DO - 10.1016/0049-089X(91)90012-R

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 109

EP - 121

JO - Social Science Research

JF - Social Science Research

SN - 0049-089X

IS - 2

ER -