Estimating the effect of protected lands on the development and conservation of their surroundings

Robert I. McDonald, Chris Yuan-Farrell, Charles Fievet, Matthias Moeller, Peter Kareiva, David Foster, Ted Gragson, Ann Kinzig, Lauren Kuby, Charles Redman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The fate of private lands is widely seen as key to the fate of biodiversity in much of the world. Organizations that work to protect biodiversity on private lands often hope that conservation actions on one piece of land will leverage the actions of surrounding landowners. Few researchers have, however, examined whether protected lands do in fact encourage land conservation nearby or how protected lands affect development in the surrounding landscape. Using spatiotemporal data sets on land cover and land protection for three sites (western North Carolina, central Massachusetts, and central Arizona), we examined whether the existence of a protected area correlates with an increased rate of nearby land conservation or a decreased rate of nearby land development. At all sites, newly protected conservation areas tended to cluster close to preexisting protected areas. This may imply that the geography of contemporary conservation actions is influenced by past decisions on land protection, often made for reasons far removed from concerns about biodiversity. On the other hand, we found no evidence that proximity to protected areas correlates with a reduced rate of nearby land development. Indeed, on two of our three sites the development rate was significantly greater in regions with more protected land. This suggests that each conservation action should be justified and valued largely for what is protected on the targeted land, without much hope of broader conservation leverage effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1526-1536
Number of pages11
JournalConservation Biology
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2007

Fingerprint

Conservation
protected area
conservation areas
Biodiversity
private lands
private land
land use
biodiversity
land management
organization of work
landowners
landowner
geography
land cover
effect
land
researchers
rate
land development
land conservation

Keywords

  • Agricultural abandonment
  • Agricultural landscape in transitions
  • AgTrans
  • Conservation easements
  • Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory
  • Deforestation
  • Fee simple
  • Harvard Forest
  • Land conversion
  • Urban and exurban development

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Estimating the effect of protected lands on the development and conservation of their surroundings. / McDonald, Robert I.; Yuan-Farrell, Chris; Fievet, Charles; Moeller, Matthias; Kareiva, Peter; Foster, David; Gragson, Ted; Kinzig, Ann; Kuby, Lauren; Redman, Charles.

In: Conservation Biology, Vol. 21, No. 6, 12.2007, p. 1526-1536.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McDonald, RI, Yuan-Farrell, C, Fievet, C, Moeller, M, Kareiva, P, Foster, D, Gragson, T, Kinzig, A, Kuby, L & Redman, C 2007, 'Estimating the effect of protected lands on the development and conservation of their surroundings', Conservation Biology, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1526-1536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00799.x
McDonald, Robert I. ; Yuan-Farrell, Chris ; Fievet, Charles ; Moeller, Matthias ; Kareiva, Peter ; Foster, David ; Gragson, Ted ; Kinzig, Ann ; Kuby, Lauren ; Redman, Charles. / Estimating the effect of protected lands on the development and conservation of their surroundings. In: Conservation Biology. 2007 ; Vol. 21, No. 6. pp. 1526-1536.
@article{c79d4be8f90d4f838ccd006b39547c52,
title = "Estimating the effect of protected lands on the development and conservation of their surroundings",
abstract = "The fate of private lands is widely seen as key to the fate of biodiversity in much of the world. Organizations that work to protect biodiversity on private lands often hope that conservation actions on one piece of land will leverage the actions of surrounding landowners. Few researchers have, however, examined whether protected lands do in fact encourage land conservation nearby or how protected lands affect development in the surrounding landscape. Using spatiotemporal data sets on land cover and land protection for three sites (western North Carolina, central Massachusetts, and central Arizona), we examined whether the existence of a protected area correlates with an increased rate of nearby land conservation or a decreased rate of nearby land development. At all sites, newly protected conservation areas tended to cluster close to preexisting protected areas. This may imply that the geography of contemporary conservation actions is influenced by past decisions on land protection, often made for reasons far removed from concerns about biodiversity. On the other hand, we found no evidence that proximity to protected areas correlates with a reduced rate of nearby land development. Indeed, on two of our three sites the development rate was significantly greater in regions with more protected land. This suggests that each conservation action should be justified and valued largely for what is protected on the targeted land, without much hope of broader conservation leverage effects.",
keywords = "Agricultural abandonment, Agricultural landscape in transitions, AgTrans, Conservation easements, Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, Deforestation, Fee simple, Harvard Forest, Land conversion, Urban and exurban development",
author = "McDonald, {Robert I.} and Chris Yuan-Farrell and Charles Fievet and Matthias Moeller and Peter Kareiva and David Foster and Ted Gragson and Ann Kinzig and Lauren Kuby and Charles Redman",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00799.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "1526--1536",
journal = "Conservation Biology",
issn = "0888-8892",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating the effect of protected lands on the development and conservation of their surroundings

AU - McDonald, Robert I.

AU - Yuan-Farrell, Chris

AU - Fievet, Charles

AU - Moeller, Matthias

AU - Kareiva, Peter

AU - Foster, David

AU - Gragson, Ted

AU - Kinzig, Ann

AU - Kuby, Lauren

AU - Redman, Charles

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - The fate of private lands is widely seen as key to the fate of biodiversity in much of the world. Organizations that work to protect biodiversity on private lands often hope that conservation actions on one piece of land will leverage the actions of surrounding landowners. Few researchers have, however, examined whether protected lands do in fact encourage land conservation nearby or how protected lands affect development in the surrounding landscape. Using spatiotemporal data sets on land cover and land protection for three sites (western North Carolina, central Massachusetts, and central Arizona), we examined whether the existence of a protected area correlates with an increased rate of nearby land conservation or a decreased rate of nearby land development. At all sites, newly protected conservation areas tended to cluster close to preexisting protected areas. This may imply that the geography of contemporary conservation actions is influenced by past decisions on land protection, often made for reasons far removed from concerns about biodiversity. On the other hand, we found no evidence that proximity to protected areas correlates with a reduced rate of nearby land development. Indeed, on two of our three sites the development rate was significantly greater in regions with more protected land. This suggests that each conservation action should be justified and valued largely for what is protected on the targeted land, without much hope of broader conservation leverage effects.

AB - The fate of private lands is widely seen as key to the fate of biodiversity in much of the world. Organizations that work to protect biodiversity on private lands often hope that conservation actions on one piece of land will leverage the actions of surrounding landowners. Few researchers have, however, examined whether protected lands do in fact encourage land conservation nearby or how protected lands affect development in the surrounding landscape. Using spatiotemporal data sets on land cover and land protection for three sites (western North Carolina, central Massachusetts, and central Arizona), we examined whether the existence of a protected area correlates with an increased rate of nearby land conservation or a decreased rate of nearby land development. At all sites, newly protected conservation areas tended to cluster close to preexisting protected areas. This may imply that the geography of contemporary conservation actions is influenced by past decisions on land protection, often made for reasons far removed from concerns about biodiversity. On the other hand, we found no evidence that proximity to protected areas correlates with a reduced rate of nearby land development. Indeed, on two of our three sites the development rate was significantly greater in regions with more protected land. This suggests that each conservation action should be justified and valued largely for what is protected on the targeted land, without much hope of broader conservation leverage effects.

KW - Agricultural abandonment

KW - Agricultural landscape in transitions

KW - AgTrans

KW - Conservation easements

KW - Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory

KW - Deforestation

KW - Fee simple

KW - Harvard Forest

KW - Land conversion

KW - Urban and exurban development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37349066238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37349066238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00799.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00799.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 18173476

AN - SCOPUS:37349066238

VL - 21

SP - 1526

EP - 1536

JO - Conservation Biology

JF - Conservation Biology

SN - 0888-8892

IS - 6

ER -