Estimates of time to collision based on binocular and monocular visual information

Robert Gray, D. Regan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To measure the absolute accuracy with which observers can estimate time to collision using binocular information alone (BI), monocular information alone (MI) and combined binocular and monocular information (MI+BI). Methods: An approaching object was simulated by changing the disparity and/or size of a spot presented on CRT monitors A brief tone was presented a fixed interval after stimulus onset. The observer's task was to judge whether the object would have collided with his/her head before or after the tone. The time to collision of the stimulus was varied according to a staircase method. Four starting sizes and four starting disparities were randomly interleaved. Results: Using BI, errors in estimates were small (<6%). Errors in estimates based on MI were small (<3%) for the two smallest starting sizes (0.4 and 0.6 deg) but were larger (>6%) for the largest starting size (1.2 deg) Errors in estimates based on MI+BI were significantly lower than for MI or BI alone and observers showed no effect of starting size Conclusions: 1) BI can be used to judge absolute time to collision accurately, at least for the close viewing distance (1.6 m) we used. 2) MI can be used to judge time to collision accurately, though observers show a small effect of starting size. 3) Judgements are significantly more accurate and there is no effect of starting size when MI+BI is used.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Volume37
Issue number3
StatePublished - Feb 15 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Head

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Estimates of time to collision based on binocular and monocular visual information. / Gray, Robert; Regan, D.

In: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Vol. 37, No. 3, 15.02.1996.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c89aa6a1560f4f8faaff960112455b80,
title = "Estimates of time to collision based on binocular and monocular visual information",
abstract = "Purpose: To measure the absolute accuracy with which observers can estimate time to collision using binocular information alone (BI), monocular information alone (MI) and combined binocular and monocular information (MI+BI). Methods: An approaching object was simulated by changing the disparity and/or size of a spot presented on CRT monitors A brief tone was presented a fixed interval after stimulus onset. The observer's task was to judge whether the object would have collided with his/her head before or after the tone. The time to collision of the stimulus was varied according to a staircase method. Four starting sizes and four starting disparities were randomly interleaved. Results: Using BI, errors in estimates were small (<6{\%}). Errors in estimates based on MI were small (<3{\%}) for the two smallest starting sizes (0.4 and 0.6 deg) but were larger (>6{\%}) for the largest starting size (1.2 deg) Errors in estimates based on MI+BI were significantly lower than for MI or BI alone and observers showed no effect of starting size Conclusions: 1) BI can be used to judge absolute time to collision accurately, at least for the close viewing distance (1.6 m) we used. 2) MI can be used to judge time to collision accurately, though observers show a small effect of starting size. 3) Judgements are significantly more accurate and there is no effect of starting size when MI+BI is used.",
author = "Robert Gray and D. Regan",
year = "1996",
month = "2",
day = "15",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
journal = "Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science",
issn = "0146-0404",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimates of time to collision based on binocular and monocular visual information

AU - Gray, Robert

AU - Regan, D.

PY - 1996/2/15

Y1 - 1996/2/15

N2 - Purpose: To measure the absolute accuracy with which observers can estimate time to collision using binocular information alone (BI), monocular information alone (MI) and combined binocular and monocular information (MI+BI). Methods: An approaching object was simulated by changing the disparity and/or size of a spot presented on CRT monitors A brief tone was presented a fixed interval after stimulus onset. The observer's task was to judge whether the object would have collided with his/her head before or after the tone. The time to collision of the stimulus was varied according to a staircase method. Four starting sizes and four starting disparities were randomly interleaved. Results: Using BI, errors in estimates were small (<6%). Errors in estimates based on MI were small (<3%) for the two smallest starting sizes (0.4 and 0.6 deg) but were larger (>6%) for the largest starting size (1.2 deg) Errors in estimates based on MI+BI were significantly lower than for MI or BI alone and observers showed no effect of starting size Conclusions: 1) BI can be used to judge absolute time to collision accurately, at least for the close viewing distance (1.6 m) we used. 2) MI can be used to judge time to collision accurately, though observers show a small effect of starting size. 3) Judgements are significantly more accurate and there is no effect of starting size when MI+BI is used.

AB - Purpose: To measure the absolute accuracy with which observers can estimate time to collision using binocular information alone (BI), monocular information alone (MI) and combined binocular and monocular information (MI+BI). Methods: An approaching object was simulated by changing the disparity and/or size of a spot presented on CRT monitors A brief tone was presented a fixed interval after stimulus onset. The observer's task was to judge whether the object would have collided with his/her head before or after the tone. The time to collision of the stimulus was varied according to a staircase method. Four starting sizes and four starting disparities were randomly interleaved. Results: Using BI, errors in estimates were small (<6%). Errors in estimates based on MI were small (<3%) for the two smallest starting sizes (0.4 and 0.6 deg) but were larger (>6%) for the largest starting size (1.2 deg) Errors in estimates based on MI+BI were significantly lower than for MI or BI alone and observers showed no effect of starting size Conclusions: 1) BI can be used to judge absolute time to collision accurately, at least for the close viewing distance (1.6 m) we used. 2) MI can be used to judge time to collision accurately, though observers show a small effect of starting size. 3) Judgements are significantly more accurate and there is no effect of starting size when MI+BI is used.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0007543116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0007543116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0007543116

VL - 37

JO - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

JF - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

SN - 0146-0404

IS - 3

ER -