Establishing measurement invariance: English and spanish paediatric asthma quality of life questionnaire

Karen H. Sousa, Stephen West, Stephanie E. Moser, Judy A. Harris, Susanne W. Cook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Registered nurses and nurse researchers often use questionnaires to measure patient outcomes. When questionnaires or other multiple-item instruments have been developed using a relatively homogeneous sample, the suitability of even a psychometrically well-developed instrument for the new population comes into question. Bias or lack of equivalence can be introduced into instruments through differences in perceptions of the meaning of the measured items, constructs, or both in the two groups. Objective: To explain measurement invariance and illustrate how it can be tested using the English and Spanish versions of the Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ). Methods: A sample of 607 children from the Phoenix Children's Hospital Breathmobile was selected for this analysis. The children were of ages 6-18 years; 61.2% completed the PAQLQ in Spanish. Testing measurement invariance using multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis, a series of hierarchical nested models, is demonstrated. In assessing the adequacy of the fit of each model at each stage, both χ tests and goodness-of-fit indexes were used. Results: The test of measurement invariance for the one-factor model showed that the English and Spanish versions of the scale met the criteria for measurement invariance. The level of strict invariance (equal factor loadings, intercepts, and residual variances between groups) was achieved. Discussion: Confirmatory factor analysis is used to evaluate the structural integrity of a measurement instrument; multiple confirmatory factor analyses are used to assess measurement invariance across different groups and to stamp the data as valid or invalid. The PAQLQ, a widely used instrument having evidence to support reliability and validity was used separately in English-and Spanish-speaking groups. Traditional methods for evaluating measurement instruments have been less than thorough, and this article demonstrates a well-developed approach, allowing for confident comparisons between populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-180
Number of pages10
JournalNursing Research
Volume61
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2012

Fingerprint

Asthma
Quality of Life
Pediatrics
Statistical Factor Analysis
Nurses
Reproducibility of Results
Population
Research Personnel
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • confirmatory factor analysis
  • measurement bias
  • patient outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Establishing measurement invariance : English and spanish paediatric asthma quality of life questionnaire. / Sousa, Karen H.; West, Stephen; Moser, Stephanie E.; Harris, Judy A.; Cook, Susanne W.

In: Nursing Research, Vol. 61, No. 3, 05.2012, p. 171-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sousa, Karen H. ; West, Stephen ; Moser, Stephanie E. ; Harris, Judy A. ; Cook, Susanne W. / Establishing measurement invariance : English and spanish paediatric asthma quality of life questionnaire. In: Nursing Research. 2012 ; Vol. 61, No. 3. pp. 171-180.
@article{f0224b8f14ac441e83ec55c5562af7f0,
title = "Establishing measurement invariance: English and spanish paediatric asthma quality of life questionnaire",
abstract = "Background: Registered nurses and nurse researchers often use questionnaires to measure patient outcomes. When questionnaires or other multiple-item instruments have been developed using a relatively homogeneous sample, the suitability of even a psychometrically well-developed instrument for the new population comes into question. Bias or lack of equivalence can be introduced into instruments through differences in perceptions of the meaning of the measured items, constructs, or both in the two groups. Objective: To explain measurement invariance and illustrate how it can be tested using the English and Spanish versions of the Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ). Methods: A sample of 607 children from the Phoenix Children's Hospital Breathmobile was selected for this analysis. The children were of ages 6-18 years; 61.2{\%} completed the PAQLQ in Spanish. Testing measurement invariance using multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis, a series of hierarchical nested models, is demonstrated. In assessing the adequacy of the fit of each model at each stage, both χ tests and goodness-of-fit indexes were used. Results: The test of measurement invariance for the one-factor model showed that the English and Spanish versions of the scale met the criteria for measurement invariance. The level of strict invariance (equal factor loadings, intercepts, and residual variances between groups) was achieved. Discussion: Confirmatory factor analysis is used to evaluate the structural integrity of a measurement instrument; multiple confirmatory factor analyses are used to assess measurement invariance across different groups and to stamp the data as valid or invalid. The PAQLQ, a widely used instrument having evidence to support reliability and validity was used separately in English-and Spanish-speaking groups. Traditional methods for evaluating measurement instruments have been less than thorough, and this article demonstrates a well-developed approach, allowing for confident comparisons between populations.",
keywords = "confirmatory factor analysis, measurement bias, patient outcomes",
author = "Sousa, {Karen H.} and Stephen West and Moser, {Stephanie E.} and Harris, {Judy A.} and Cook, {Susanne W.}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182544750",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "171--180",
journal = "Nursing Research",
issn = "0029-6562",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Establishing measurement invariance

T2 - English and spanish paediatric asthma quality of life questionnaire

AU - Sousa, Karen H.

AU - West, Stephen

AU - Moser, Stephanie E.

AU - Harris, Judy A.

AU - Cook, Susanne W.

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - Background: Registered nurses and nurse researchers often use questionnaires to measure patient outcomes. When questionnaires or other multiple-item instruments have been developed using a relatively homogeneous sample, the suitability of even a psychometrically well-developed instrument for the new population comes into question. Bias or lack of equivalence can be introduced into instruments through differences in perceptions of the meaning of the measured items, constructs, or both in the two groups. Objective: To explain measurement invariance and illustrate how it can be tested using the English and Spanish versions of the Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ). Methods: A sample of 607 children from the Phoenix Children's Hospital Breathmobile was selected for this analysis. The children were of ages 6-18 years; 61.2% completed the PAQLQ in Spanish. Testing measurement invariance using multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis, a series of hierarchical nested models, is demonstrated. In assessing the adequacy of the fit of each model at each stage, both χ tests and goodness-of-fit indexes were used. Results: The test of measurement invariance for the one-factor model showed that the English and Spanish versions of the scale met the criteria for measurement invariance. The level of strict invariance (equal factor loadings, intercepts, and residual variances between groups) was achieved. Discussion: Confirmatory factor analysis is used to evaluate the structural integrity of a measurement instrument; multiple confirmatory factor analyses are used to assess measurement invariance across different groups and to stamp the data as valid or invalid. The PAQLQ, a widely used instrument having evidence to support reliability and validity was used separately in English-and Spanish-speaking groups. Traditional methods for evaluating measurement instruments have been less than thorough, and this article demonstrates a well-developed approach, allowing for confident comparisons between populations.

AB - Background: Registered nurses and nurse researchers often use questionnaires to measure patient outcomes. When questionnaires or other multiple-item instruments have been developed using a relatively homogeneous sample, the suitability of even a psychometrically well-developed instrument for the new population comes into question. Bias or lack of equivalence can be introduced into instruments through differences in perceptions of the meaning of the measured items, constructs, or both in the two groups. Objective: To explain measurement invariance and illustrate how it can be tested using the English and Spanish versions of the Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ). Methods: A sample of 607 children from the Phoenix Children's Hospital Breathmobile was selected for this analysis. The children were of ages 6-18 years; 61.2% completed the PAQLQ in Spanish. Testing measurement invariance using multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis, a series of hierarchical nested models, is demonstrated. In assessing the adequacy of the fit of each model at each stage, both χ tests and goodness-of-fit indexes were used. Results: The test of measurement invariance for the one-factor model showed that the English and Spanish versions of the scale met the criteria for measurement invariance. The level of strict invariance (equal factor loadings, intercepts, and residual variances between groups) was achieved. Discussion: Confirmatory factor analysis is used to evaluate the structural integrity of a measurement instrument; multiple confirmatory factor analyses are used to assess measurement invariance across different groups and to stamp the data as valid or invalid. The PAQLQ, a widely used instrument having evidence to support reliability and validity was used separately in English-and Spanish-speaking groups. Traditional methods for evaluating measurement instruments have been less than thorough, and this article demonstrates a well-developed approach, allowing for confident comparisons between populations.

KW - confirmatory factor analysis

KW - measurement bias

KW - patient outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861171801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861171801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182544750

DO - 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182544750

M3 - Article

C2 - 22551991

AN - SCOPUS:84861171801

VL - 61

SP - 171

EP - 180

JO - Nursing Research

JF - Nursing Research

SN - 0029-6562

IS - 3

ER -